IETF Logo Mail Archive

[apps-discuss] Review of liaison from ITU-T regarding OIDs -- volunteer needed!

Patrik Fältström <patrik@frobbit.se> Thu, 22 July 2010 08:10 UTC

Return-Path: <patrik@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98D13A63D3 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.472
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.472 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.662, BAYES_05=-1.11, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FkPqsP5XteIR for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srv01.frobbit.se (srv01.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1D13A681F for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by srv01.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61676CBCB06E; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:10:52 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at frobbit.se
Received: from srv01.frobbit.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv01.frobbit.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HjGoghknIYcP; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:10:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffc::dead:beef] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffc::dead:beef]) (Authenticated sender: paf01) by srv01.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094AFCBCB064; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:10:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Patrik Fältström <patrik@frobbit.se>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Apple-Mail-320-831340575"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:10:51 +0200
Message-Id: <828A6079-FEC7-4173-A611-BFCB20BAAC2F@frobbit.se>
To: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.2.3
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: IAB IAB <iab@iab.org>
Subject: [apps-discuss] Review of liaison from ITU-T regarding OIDs -- volunteer needed!
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:10:39 -0000

IETF has received the following liaison:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/903/

We need someone that can write a response to the liaison. I can help with formalities.

   Patrik Fältström
   Liaison from IETF to ITU-T

P.S. My personal very quick reading of the liaison and related documents together with Olaf Kolkman (as IAB chair) gave:

Patrik wrote:
> Olaf wrote:

>> I've skimmed the doc.
>> 
>> - I observe slightly different RCODE semantics in 5.2.6
>> - I also observe that the service name chosen doesn't seem to followhttp://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4848#section-4.5 but I may be misreading something here?
>> 
>> 
>> The higher level question is what is the IETF action here? Any IANA registration needed? Do we need to review DDDS formally?
> 
> Yes, some action is needed. And the way I read the documents, an RFC is needed:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3958#section-7
> 
> At least one that references the ITU-T document according to the normal referencing mechanisms agreed upon.
> 
>> Who takes has the token for determining next actions?
> 
> I think IAB should try to find someone that can do a more detailed review than what I here has done.
> 
>> 6.2.1	These requirements are placed on the .oid-res.org operational agency (and recursively on all DNS zone files in the .oid-res.org domain.
> 
> If this is an ISO/ITU "formal" namespace "thing", I think the domain should go in .ARPA.
> 
>> 6.3.1.3
>> The DNAME resource record shall be preceded by:
>> a)	the Unicode label on the arc to that child transformed as specified in IETF RFC 3490, section 4.1, including case folding (see IETF RFC 3454) and punycode encoding (see IETF RFC 3492) using the Compatibility Decomposition followed by Canonical Composition (NFKC) specified by Unicode 5.2, Annex 15; then
> 
> They should do something new here, following the newprep work in the IETF. 3490 etc are (on their way to be) obsolete.
> 
>  Patrik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email