How IESG Sends Architectural Questions to IAB

Preparation
When we (IESG) want architectural help/review from/by the IAB,
then we should properly formulate what we expect.
What we should make clear is:
- What is the exact architural question we have.
It is good if IESG has consensus on the question as well.
- What type of response we want to get, e.g. one or more of:
- a document;
- a (few) paragraph(s),
- an e-mail to IESG or some specific mailing list
- discussion with IESG or some specific WG
- By what time we expect the above to happen
- If we believe we know who on the IAB would have the appropriate
background to tackle the problem, we should be prepared to
inform IAB, IAB-chair or specific person(s) about that.
Actual Steps:
- Once IESG agrees on the above, the IESG chair sends an
email to the iab mailing list.
- The first round of discussions is then to make sure that IAB and
IESG have a common understanding of the question and expected
delivery and time-frame.
- If IAB however has clarifying questions then we need to discuss
and explain, which may result in a re-statement of the question.
This discussion is expected to happen on both iab and iesg mailing
lists. Sometimes things may be easy and do not need this step.
- Once IAB and IESG agree on the question, the deliverable,
and the respective IAB & IESG members who are designated as
responsible for seeing this activity to completion, the
IAB starts the work and delivers as requested. The designated
stuckees may continue to discuss (liaise) refinements as needed.
- When IAB thinks they have delivered, the IAB chair sends an
email to IESG saying so and pointing to the deliverable.
- IESG checks and IESG chair lets IAB know if they are happy and
if not explain why not.
Last Updated on Aug 08, 2003 by Bert Wijnen