Skip to main content
  • IETF 119 post-meeting survey

    IETF 119 Brisbane was held 16-22 March 2024 and the results of the post-meeting survey are now available on a web-based interactive dashboard.

    12 Apr 2024
  • New working group aims to make spotting unwanted trackers easier

    Location-tracking accessories provide numerous benefits to users, such as being able to find where they left their keys. But they can also have security and privacy implications if used for malicious purposes. A newly formed IETF working group has taken on the task to standardize a protocol that protects people against being unknowingly tracked.

    14 Mar 2024
  • New Internet Architecture Board, IETF Trust, IETF LLC and Internet Engineering Task Force Leadership Announced

    Members of the incoming Internet Architecture Board (IAB), the IETF Trust, the IETF Administration LLC (IETF LLC) Board of Directors, and the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG)—which provides leadership for the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)—have been officially announced, with new members selected by the 2023-2024 IETF Nominating Committee.

    12 Mar 2024
  • IAB Workshop on Barriers to Internet Access of Services (BIAS)

    The Internet Architecture Board (IAB) organizes workshops about topics of interest to the community that bring diverse experts together, raise awareness, and possibly identify the next steps that can be explored by the community. The IAB held its “Barriers for Internet Access of Services (Bias)” fully online workshop during the week of January 15, 2024.

    5 Mar 2024
  • Suggested IETF 119 Sessions for Getting Familiar with New Topics

    These IETF 119 meeting sessions included discussions and proposals that are accessible to a broad range of Internet technologists whether they are new to the IETF or long-time participants.

    26 Feb 2024

Filter by topic and date

Filter by topic and date

IETF LLC Statement on OFAC Compliance Questions

24 Mar 2021

IETF contributors recently asked the IETF LLC about the implications of complying with the US Treasury Department’s Office of Financial Asset Controls (OFAC).

See:

The sanctions rules managed by the US Treasury Department’s Office of Financial Asset Controls (OFAC) are nuanced and complex; broad statements about them are inevitably oversimplifications. That said, we think it unlikely that OFAC rules would meaningfully inhibit participation in IETF activities by individuals from sanctioned countries, or ever have in the past, as a general matter. OFAC rules focus on transactions and trade. Most IETF activity is fundamentally speech, excepted out from OFAC regulation either explicitly in the OFAC rules themselves or implicitly via U.S. constitutional safeguards.

We are not aware of any instance where OFAC rules have inhibited an individual from participating in the IETF. If such a situation were to arise in the future, we would work the affected individual to seek an appropriate accommodation to enable participation—for example, we could avoid problematic transactions while still engaging in communications, or seek a license from OFAC, or even escalate the issue as a legal matter if we thought that an individual’s right “to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers” was being infringed (quoting the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights).

Properly complying with the OFAC regulations—as well as all other applicable laws and regulations—remains a critical task for IETF LLC. Our OFAC policy is designed to ensure our compliance. We do not anticipate that compliance will cause negative impacts on the IETF or its current or potential future new participants.

Recommendation of the IETF LLC to the General Area Dispatch working group and the Internet-Draft authors that asked the initial question.

We have no data to suggest OFAC rules have ever prevented any individual from participating in and contributing to the technical work of the IETF. We predict this will remain true in the future. OFAC rules thus do not appear to be a factor that will lead to a negative impact on the diversity and inclusiveness of the IETF. Further, OFAC regulations are a complex, nuanced topic that is difficult for non-experts to assess, and that defy simple summary treatment. Misstatements about compliance can have consequences. 

Accordingly, we recommend that any IETF groups or individuals focusing on issues of diversity and inclusiveness leave OFAC issues out of scope, given that (a) they are unlikely to negatively impact participation, (b) there is no evidence suggesting it has had an impact in the past, and (c) statements about IETF OFAC compliance are best managed by legal counsel.


Share this page