About the IETF

Internet-Drafts

RFC Pages

Working Groups

bullet WG Charters

bullet Email Lists

bullet Proceedings

bullet WG Chairs' Page

bullet BOF Sessions

Web Tools

Meetings

Mailing Lists

IESG

IPR

Liaisons

Secretariat

Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (dccp)


In addition to this official charter maintained by the IETF Secretariat, there is additional informati on about this working group on the Web at:
Additional DCCP Web Page

Last Modified: 2008-11-19

Additional information is available at tools.ietf.org/wg/dccp

Chair(s):

Transport Area Director(s):

Transport Area Advisor:

Mailing Lists:

General Discussion: dccp@ietf.org
To Subscribe: dccp-request@ietf.org
In Body: (un)subscribe
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dccp/index.html

Description of Working Group:

The Datagram Control Protocol working group is chartered to develop and
standardize the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP). DCCP is a
minimal general purpose transport-layer protocol providing only two
core functions:

- the establishment, maintenance and teardown of an unreliable packet
  flow.

- congestion control of that packet flow.

Within the constraints of providing these core functions, DCCP aims to
be a general purpose protocol, minimizing the overhead of packet
header
size or end-node processing as much as possible. Therefore, DCCP is as
simple as possible, and as far as reasonably possible, it should avoid
providing higher-level transport functionality. DCCP will provide a
congestion-controlled, unreliable packet stream, without TCP's
reliability or in-order delivery semantics. Additional unicast,
flow-based application functionality can be layered over DCCP.


SCOPE

Drafts for DCCP, and several associated congestion control IDs, already
exist. The first task before the working group will be an abbreviated
functional requirement validation of those drafts. There are two
possible outcomes:

1) The current DCCP draft is declared suitable for further work, with
  some areas listed for possible extension.

2) The current DCCP draft is declared unsuitable for further work, and
  more formal functional requirement exploration begins.

Prior to the final development of the protocol, the working group will
investigate areas of functionality that should be integrated into DCCP
because they are difficult or impossible to layer above it. These areas
include security and multi-homing/mobility, at a minimum. The protocol
will be for both IPv4 and IPv6. It will not encompass multicast. It
is strictly a unicast transport.

For security, the working group will endeavor to ensure that DCCP
incorporates good non-cryptographic mechanisms that make it resistant
to denial-of-service attacks on DCCP connections and DCCP servers. A
related topic that will be explored is whether DCCP can be a candidate
to replace UDP in the transport of security management protocols such
as IKE and JFK.

The working group will also investigate DCCP's relationship with RTP
(the Real-time Transport Protocol).

Once the DCCP specification has stabilized, the WG will produce a
document providing guidance to potential users of DCCP. The precise
form of this document will be determined by WG discussion, but it
might
include example APIs, an applicability statement, or other forms of
guidance about appropriate usage of DCCP.

Goals and Milestones:

Done  Publish summary of required protocol functions/requirements
Done  Decision to build on proposed DCCP protocol, alternate protocol, or quit and go home
Done  Detailed review of spec and CCIDs
Done  Public design review at IETF meeting
Done  Working group last call for spec and CCIDs
Done  Submit DCCP spec for IESG/IETF review to be Proposed Standard
Done  Submit DCCP CCIDs for IESG/IETF review to be Proposed Standard
Done  Complete WGLC draft-ietf-dccp-problem-xx as Informational
Done  Complete WGLC draft-ietf-dccp-tfrc-voip as Experimental
Done  Complete WGLC 'RTP over DCCP' as PS
Done  Complete WGLC 'DTLS over DCCP' as PS
Done  Complete WGLC for draft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis as PS
Done  Complete WGLC for draft-ietf-dccp-serv-codes as PS
Jul 2008  Complete WGLC draft-ietf-dccp-ccid4 as Experimental
Sep 2008  Complete WGLC draft-ietf-dccp-tfrc-faster-restart as Experimental
Sep 2008  Complete WGLC for draft-ietf-dccp-simul-open as PS
Mar 2009  Complete WGLC draft-ietf-dccp-quickstart as Experimental

Internet-Drafts:

RTP and the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) (0 bytes)
The DCCP Service Code (0 bytes)
DCCP Simultaneous-Open Technique to Facilitate NAT/Middlebox Traversal (0 bytes)
Quick-Start for Datagram Congestion Cntrol Protocol (DCCP) (0 bytes)

Request For Comments:

Problem Statement for the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) (RFC 4336) (53585 bytes)
Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) (RFC 4340) (318830 bytes)
Profile for Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) Congestion Control ID 2: TCP-like Congestion Control (RFC 4341) (47868 bytes)
Profile for Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) Congestion Control ID 3: TCP-Friendly Rate Control (TFRC) (RFC 4342) (83054 bytes)
TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): the Small-Packet (SP) Variant (RFC 4828) (116808 bytes)
Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) over the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) (RFC 5238) (24395 bytes)
TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): Protocol Specification (RFC 5348) (133185 bytes)