Geographic Location/Privacy (geopriv)In addition to this official charter maintained by the IETF Secretariat, there is additional information about this working group on the Web at: Additional GEOPRIV Web Page Last Modified: 2009-05-29 Additional information is available at tools.ietf.org/wg/geopriv
Chair(s):Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area Director(s):Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area Advisor:Technical Advisor(s):Mailing Lists:General Discussion: geopriv@ietf.orgTo Subscribe: geopriv-request@ietf.org In Body: subscribe Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/index.html Description of Working Group:As more and more resources become available on the Internet, someapplications need to acquire geographic location information about certain resources or entities. These applications include navigation, emergency services, management of equipment in the field, and other location-based services. But while the formatting and transfer of such information is in some sense a straightforward process, the implications of doing it, especially in regards to privacy and security, are anything but. The primary task of this working group will be to assess the the authorization, integrity and privacy requirements that must be met in order to transfer such information, or authorize the release or representation of such information through an agent. In addition, the working group will select an already standardized format to recommend for use in representing location per se. A key task will be to enhance this format and protocol approaches using the enhanced format, to ensure that the security and privacy methods are available to diverse location-aware applications. Approaches to be considered will include (among others) data formats incorporating fields directing the privacy handling of the location information and possible methods of specifying variable precision of location. Also to be considered will be: authorization of requestors and responders; authorization of proxies (for instance, the ability to authorize a carrier to reveal what timezone one is in, but not what city. An approach to the taxonomy of requestors, as well as to the resolution or precision of information given them, will be part of this deliverable. The combination of these elements should provide a service capable of transferring geographic location information in a private and secure fashion (including the option of denying transfer). For reasons of both future interoperability and assurance of the security and privacy goals, it is a goal of the working group to deliver a specification that has broad applicablity and will become mandatory to implement for IETF protocols that are location-aware. Two further deliverables of the WG will be: o An example API for application-level access to/management of link-based location information. That is, for instance, the WG may describe an API for secure, privacy-enabling user/ application handling of location information specific to a 3G wireless link technology. o Development of i-ds that make security and privacy integral to location information in HTTP and HTML, based on the work in draft-daviel-html-geo-tag-05.txt and draft-daviel-http-geo-header-03.txt. Out of Scope: This WG won't develop location-determining technology. It will work from existing technologies and where the technology is undeveloped, will state that applicability may await others' developments. This WG won't develop technology to support any particular regulatory requirement [e.g. E.911] but will provide a framework that might be used for private/secure definition of such technologies by other bodies. Coordination: The WG will coordinate with other WGs developing general privacy and location-aware functions, e.g. the SIP WG, so that the WG deliverables can be used by them. Other coordination should include the NymIP research community, WC3, and the Location Information Forum. Goals and Milestones:
Internet-Drafts:Geolocation Policy: A Document Format for Expressing Privacy Preferences for Location Information (59615 bytes)Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS and Diameter (121600 bytes) GEOPRIV Layer 7 Location Configuration Protocol; Problem Statement and Requirements (40042 bytes) HTTP Enabled Location Delivery (HELD) (102080 bytes) Requirements for a Location-by-Reference Mechanism (39332 bytes) Discovering the Local Location Information Server (LIS) (36317 bytes) Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) IPv4 and IPv6 Option for a Location Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) (31393 bytes) Implications of 'retransmission-allowed' for SIP Location Conveyance (29199 bytes) Considerations for Civic Addresses in PIDF-LO - Guidelines and IANA Registry Definition (64337 bytes) A Uniform Resource Identifier for Geographic Locations ('geo' URI) (26784 bytes) Request For Comments:Geopriv requirements (RFC 3693) (68881 bytes)Threat Analysis of the geopriv Protocol (RFC 3694) (44364 bytes) Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Option for Coordinate-based Location Configuration Information (RFC 3825) (31715 bytes) A Presence Architecture for the Distribution of GEOPRIV Location Objects (RFC 4079) (16718 bytes) A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object Format (RFC 4119) (53522 bytes) updated by RFC 5139,RFC 5491 Location Types Registry (RFC 4589) (24037 bytes) Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses Configuration Information (RFC 4676) (45208 bytes) obsoleted by RFC 4776 Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses Configuration Information (RFC 4776) (45495 bytes) obsoletes RFC 4676 Common Policy: A Document Format for Expressing Privacy Preferences (RFC 4745) (63602 bytes) Revised Civic Location Format for Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) (RFC 5139) (27470 bytes) updates RFC 4119 GEOPRIV Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) Usage Clarification, Considerations, and Recommendations (RFC 5491) (51681 bytes) updates RFC 4119 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||