IETF - Working Group Charters

Centralized Conferencing (xcon)

In addition to this official charter maintained by the IETF Secretariat, there is additional information about this working group on the Web at:
Additional XCON Web Page

Last Modified: 2008-08-21

Additional information is available at tools.ietf.org/wg/xcon

Chair(s):

Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area Director(s):

Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Area Advisor:

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>

Mailing Lists:

General Discussion: xcon@ietf.org
To Subscribe: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xcon/index.html

Description of Working Group:

The focus of this working group is to develop a standardized suite of
protocols for tightly-coupled multimedia conferences, where strong
security and authorization requirements are integral to the solution.
Tightly-coupled conferences have a central point of control and
authorization (known as a focus) so they can enforce specific media and
membership relationships, and provide an accurate roster of
participants. The media mixing or combining function of a
tightly-coupled conference need not be performed centrally, however.

The scope of this effort is intentionally more narrow than previous
attempts to standardize conferencing (e.g. centralized control), and is
intended to enable interoperability in a commercial environment which
already has a number of non-standard implementations using some of the
protocols.

Privacy, security, and authorization mechanisms are integral to the
solution generated by the working group. This includes allowing
participants to be invisible to all but the conference owner, or to be
visible but participate anonymously with respect to some or all of
the other participants.

Authorization rules allow for participants and non-participants
to have roles (ex: speaker, moderator, owner), and to be otherwise
authorized to perform membership and media manipulation for or on
behalf of other participants. In order to preserve these properties,
the protocols used will require implementation of channel security
and authentication services.

Due to the centralized architecture of the WG, XCON's mechanisms will
place requirements on the signaling protocol used between the focus
and
the participants. At a high level, the signaling protocol must be able
to establish, tear down, modify, and perform call control operations on
multimedia streams, including voice, video, and instant messaging, in
both a centralized and distributed mixing architecture. SIP will be
the
reference session signaling protocol used for examples; however, none
of
the XCON solutions themselves will be signaling protocols, nor will
XCON
extend existing signaling protocols. Other signaling protocols than
SIP
may be used between the focus and participants, including non-IETF
protocols, but the requirements and possible extensions needed for
other
signaling protocols to utilize the full functionality of the XCON
architecture is outside the scope of XCON.

The deliverables for the group will be:
- A mechanism for membership and authorization control
- A mechanism to manipulate and describe media "mixing" or "topology"
for multiple media types (audio, video, text)
- A mechanism for notification of conference related events/changes
(for
example a floor change)
- A basic floor control protocol

The initial set of protocols will be developed for use in unicast media
conferences. The working group will perform a second round of work to
enhance the set of protocols as necessary for use with multicast media
after their initial publication.

The following items are specifically out-of-scope:
- Voting
- Fully distributed conferences
- Loosely-coupled conferences (no central point of control)
- Far-end device control
- Protocol used between the conference controller and the mixer(s)
- Capabilities negotiation of the mixer(s)
- Master-slave cascaded conferences

The working group will coordinate closely with the SIPPING and
MMUSIC working groups. In addition the working group will cooperate
with other groups as needed, including SIP, MSEC, AVT, and the W3C
SMIL working groups. In addition, the working group will consider
a number of existing drafts as input to the working group.

Goals and Milestones:

Done		Submit Requirements for Basic Floor Control for publication as Informational
Done		Submit Conferencing Scenarios document for publication as Informational
Done		Submit Basic Floor Control Protocol for publication as PS
Apr 2008		Submit Framework and Data Model for publication as PS
Sep 2008		Submit Event Notification Package for publication as PS
Dec 2008		Submit Conference Data Model for publication as PS
Dec 2008		Submit Conference Control Protocol for publication as PS
Apr 2009		Submit Policy Model for publication as PS
Apr 2009		Set milestones for any IM-related conferencing work

Internet-Drafts:

Conference Information Data Model for Centralized Conferencing (XCON) (186305 bytes)
Conference Event Package Data Format Extension for Centralized Conferencing (XCON) (28972 bytes)
Centralized Conferencing Manipulation Protocol (159830 bytes)

Request For Comments:

Requirements for Floor Control Protocol (RFC 4376) (30021 bytes)
Conferencing Scenarios (RFC 4597) (38428 bytes)
The Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) (RFC 4582) (154497 bytes)
Connection Establishment in the Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP) (RFC 5018) (20244 bytes)
A Framework for Centralized Conferencing (RFC 5239) (146927 bytes)