Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure (opsec)Last Modified: 2009-04-20 Additional information is available at tools.ietf.org/wg/opsec
Chair(s):Operations and Management Area Director(s):Operations and Management Area Advisor:Mailing Lists:General Discussion: opsec@ietf.orgTo Subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec In Body: In Body: subscribe Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec/current/maillist.html Description of Working Group:Goals:The OPSEC WG will document best current practices with regard to network security. In particular an effort will be made to clarify the rationale supporting current operational practice, address gaps in currently understood best practices for forwarding, control plane, and management plane security and make clear the liabilities inherent in security practices where they exist. Scope: The scope of the OPSEC WG is intended to include the protection and secure operation of the forwarding, control and management planes. Documentation of best common practices, revision of existing operational security practices documents and proposals for new approaches to operational challenges are in scope. Method: It is expected that the work product of the working group will fall into the category of best current practices documents. Taxonomy or problem statement documents may provide a basis for best current practices documents. Best Current Practices Document For each topic addressed, a document will be produced that attempts to capture current practices related to secure operation. This will be primarily based on operational experience. Each entry will list: * threats addressed, * current practices for addressing the threat, * protocols, tools and technologies extant at the time of writing that are used to address the threat, * the possibility that a solution does not exist within existing tools or technologies. Taxonomy and Problem Statement Documents A document which attempts to describe the scope of particular operational security challenge or problem space without necessarily coming to a conclusion or proposing a solution. Such a document might be a precursor to a best common practices document. While the principal input of the Working Group are operational experience and needs, the output should be directed both to provide guidance to the operators community as well as to Working Groups that develop protocols or the community of protocol developers at large, as well as to the implementers of these protocols. Non-Goals: The Operations security working group is not the place to do new protocols. New protocol work should be addressed in a working group chartered in the appropriate area or as individual submissions. The OPSEC WG may take on documents related to the practices of using such work. Goals and Milestones:
Internet-Drafts:Security Best Practices Efforts and Documents (59864 bytes)Recommendations for filtering ICMP messages (86523 bytes) Issues with existing Cryptographic Protection Methods for Routing Protocols (44886 bytes) Security Assessment of the Internet Protocol version 4 (172363 bytes) Cryptographic Authentication Algorithm Implementation Best Practices for Routing Protocols (25342 bytes) Request For Comments:Operational Security Current Practices in Internet Service Provider Environments (RFC 4778) (88344 bytes)Remote Triggered Black Hole Filtering with Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) (RFC 5635) (30232 bytes) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||