Internet Draft L. Dusseault
Document: draft-dusseault-deltav-subset-00.txt Xythos
Expires: April 2002 October 2001
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring
Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as
reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in
this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119
[RFC2119].
Abstract
This document specifies a consistent profile or subset of the
features from the DeltaV specification [DeltaV]. The subset is
suitable for simple linear document versioning in a WebDAV [RFC2518]
environment. The subset is intended to limit functionality in order
to improve predictability and thus interoperability. If a server
advertises support for this subset, then a client can interoperate
with that server very easily due to its predictability. A server
advertising support for this subset MUST also support DeltaV.
Table of Contents
1 Overview.......................................................3
2 Introduction...................................................3
2.1 Definition of Simple Versioning.............................3
2.2 Requirements for Simple Versioning..........................5
Dusseault Expires April 2002 1
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
2.3 Minimal Server Options:.....................................6
2.4 Unsupported DeltaV Features.................................6
3 Required Resources.............................................7
3.1 Version-Controlled Resources................................8
3.2 Versions....................................................8
3.3 Working Resources...........................................8
3.4 Version History Resources...................................8
4 Recommended Functionality......................................8
4.1 Deleting VCRs...............................................8
4.2 Turning Versioning Off......................................8
4.3 Deleting Versions...........................................9
5 Required Methods..............................................10
5.1 VERSION-CONTROL............................................10
5.2 CHECKOUT...................................................10
5.3 CHECKIN....................................................11
5.4 UNCHECKOUT.................................................11
5.5 REPORT.....................................................11
6 Required Properties...........................................12
6.1 DAV:comment................................................12
6.2 DAV:supported-method-set...................................12
6.3 DAV:supported-report-set...................................14
6.4 DAV:supported-live-property-set............................14
6.5 DAV:creator-displayname....................................15
6.6 DAV:checked-in.............................................15
6.7 DAV:checked-out............................................15
6.8 DAV:auto-version...........................................15
6.9 DAV:predecessor-set........................................16
6.10 DAV:successor-set..........................................16
6.11 DAV:checkout-set...........................................16
6.12 DAV:version-name...........................................17
6.13 DAV:auto-update............................................17
6.14 DAV:checkin-fork...........................................17
6.15 DAV:checkout-fork..........................................17
6.16 DAV:version-set............................................18
6.17 DAV:root-version...........................................18
6.18 DAV:version-history........................................18
7 Security Considerations.......................................18
8 References....................................................19
9 Author's Addresses............................................19
Dusseault Expires April 2002 2
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
1 Overview
DeltaV [DeltaV] is a very complete versioning specification for
diverse environments. It has options to support a wide variety of
versioning features ranging from simple to complex. It is capable
of exposing a source code repository to source management clients,
which typically have very extensive and complex versioning
functionality requirements.
The DeltaV specification presents a few challenges for simpler
authoring software:
- Server implementers may find it difficult to choose a limited
subset of features that is sufficient and complete for simple
versioning, yet is compliant with DeltaV.
- Clients that are not primarily versioning applications may not
wish to implement extensive code for handling all the DeltaV
features, and thus will find it challenging to deal with
servers that vary in what features and options are implemented.
- Clients and servers both may have to expend a lot of research
and thought to figure out what features to support to
interoperate with a large number of other DeltaV
implementations.
This document attempts to improve interoperability for simple
versioning in the following ways:
- By setting aside some features which need not be implemented at
all for clients or servers following this subset (e.g. merge,
baseline, activity features)
- By recommending limited options for features that are complex
(e.g. only one value recommended for auto-versioning behavior)
- By explaining and providing examples where helpful.
- By explaining how to implement a non-forking server with
DeltaV.
The versioning model followed by this draft is unchanged from the
DeltaV model.
2 Introduction
2.1 Definition of Simple Versioning
Simple versioning systems are those that work with largely
independent documents. This description includes user-oriented
documents such as images, word processor documents, spreadsheets,
and plain text files. This description does not include files that
are strongly inter-related and that change frequently, such as the
set of source code files that need to be compiled together to build
a software program. The definition here is merely a matter of
convenience in order to be able to draw a line; however, from
looking at the versioning systems that exist, they do seem to fall
into two categories on either side of that line.
Dusseault Expires April 2002 3
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
Systems that implement source code versioning have a number of
requirements that are not necessarily requirements when source code
isnÆt involved. Some of the differences:
- Source code file versions relate to each other in very
important ways. Thus, there may be a need for workspaces to
group related files together while working on new versions, or
baselines to group a bunch of versions together, or activities
or version-controlled collections. In contrast, the dominant
situation with regular document collaboration is that each
document is stand-alone: although it relates to other
documents, it doesnÆt have to be kept in strict compatibility
with other documents in the same system. Although a few
documentation tools link natural-language documents together,
these tools and the documents they produce are rare compared to
stand-alone natural-language documents.
- Source code systems generally require multiple authors to be
able to modify a file at the same time. Features like multiple
working resources and/or activities are usually required.
Also, source code systems may often be able to merge changes
from multiple authors together because of the nature of files
stored in those systems. In contrast, in simple document
management situations, it's usually sufficient to limit
authoring to one at a time, and it's rarely easy to merge
documents together (imagine merging two sets of changes to one
image together). Thus, both multiple working resources and
merges are not required for simple document versioning.
- Source code repositories are usually required to keep all old
versions. It can be very important to be able to retrieve any
archived version. In contrast, there are sometimes scenarios
where itÆs very important to delete old versions, for legal
purposes or for privacy. Note that DeltaV does allow versions
to be deleted, but it also allows the server to forbid deleting
versions, so clients may not be able to predict server behavior
in this respect until trying it.
- Interoperability with existing WebDAV clients like Office 2000
and Adobe authoring applications is of primary importance for
document-oriented versioning servers. Source code versioning
servers may not have to interoperate with those, but instead
only have to interoperate with more special-purpose versioning
clients (CVS client, Visual Source Safe client, subversion).
- Forking is usually required in source control systems, but
rarely required in simple document systems. Unlike source code
files, when regular files need to diverge down two paths, they
can almost always be copied and given two different names or
locations.
In summary, a simple document versioning system can implement less
than half the features a complete source versioning system needs,
Dusseault Expires April 2002 4
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
yet satisfy 90% of the needs for authors of those documents. If
this profile selects features carefully it can vastly reduce the
complexity of versioning for simple document management clients and
servers, yet still remain entirely compatible with DeltaV.
2.2 Requirements for Simple Versioning
The following functionality is required in document versioning
systems.
- Interoperate with non-versioning clients
- Turn versioning on for a resource
- Turn versioning off for a resource (by deleting the VHR)
- Find all versions
- Support for checkout-in-place required for interoperability
with non-versioning-aware clients.
- Support for deleting versions
- Global properties -- properties whose value applies to the
entire version history, not just one version (these are
supported on the VHR)
As a result of these requirements, the following DeltaV features are
required:
- version-control
- checkout-in-place
- version-history
The DeltaV feature "working-resource" is recommended as well, but
optional.
This specification defines an additional feature string "simple-
deltav-subset", to be displayed in the OPTIONS response. This helps
the client know if the server is going to behave predictably. If
the server advertises "simple-deltav-subset" support, it must meet
the following requirements:
- MUST NOT have forks in the version history
- MUST NOT allow UPDATE to make a version other than the latest
version be the target version
- MUST NOT allow versions to be checked out
- MUST NOT have more than one working resource associated with a
VCR
- MUST NOT have more than one VCR associated with a VHR.
- MUST support version-control, checkout-in-place, version-
history features
The OPTIONS response for a server supporting this specification may
look like this:
OPTIONS * HTTP/1.1
Host: subset.deltav.webdav.org
Dusseault Expires April 2002 5
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
DAV: 1, 2, version-control, checkout-in-place, version-history,
working-resource, simple-deltav-subset
Allow: PUT, POST, HEAD, OPTIONS, GET, TRACE, DELETE, CONNECT,
PROPFIND, PROPPATCH, MKCOL, COPY, MOVE, LOCK, UNLOCK,
VERSION-CONTROL, CHECKOUT, UNCHECKOUT, REPORT
2.3 Minimal Server Option Discovery Required
This specification attempts to keep variation between server
implementations to an absolute minimum in order to allow very simple
client implementations to be written. There are very few options
for variation between servers that support this specification. This
means that the client may have to look in only a couple cases to see
which way the server operates.
- Checkout location: server can support in-place only, or both
in-place and working resource. Support for both is there if the
server supports this subset plus ôworking-resourceö in the DAV:
header.
- Auto-versioning: server can support checkin-when-unlocked or
nothing. Client can check this on any VCR by looking at the
value of the auto-versioning property.
Of course, the server can also support advanced DeltaV features,
such as LABEL. However, if support for advanced features means
violating any of the requirements in the previous section, then the
server cannot advertise support for "simple-deltav-subset" because
it will not be able to meet the expectations of a simple subset
client.
2.4 Unsupported DeltaV Features
In addition to the unsupported packages (label, update, merge,
workspace, version-history, baseline, activity, version-controlled-
collection), these following features are explicitly not supported
for this subset. An implementation is allowed to support them, but
interoperability does not require them.
a) UPDATE and current version
In source control systems, UPDATE is used to get a Version-
Controlled Resource to point to (represent) a version other than
latest checked-in version. Document systems rarely need this
functionality, and worse, it severely complicates many client
operations as well as server implementations. Therefore the UPDATE
method and functionality must not be supported on a server
advertising support for this subset. This has the following
simplifying consequences:
- If the resource is checked in, the latest checked-in version is
always the one visible in the Version-Controlled Resource.
Dusseault Expires April 2002 6
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
- Whenever the checkout is done it must be done on the VCR. If
the intent is to create a working resource, it must be done
with the ôapply-to-versionö flag.
- Auto-update will be done whenever a working resource or
checkout in-place is checked in. This means that the ôauto-
updateö property on a working resource will always contain an
href pointing to the VCR. Servers may refuse any CHECKIN where
the auto-update value has not been set as above.
- Only the latest version may be checked out. This makes it much
easier to handle checkout-set: only the latest version can ever
have a non-null value for checkout-set. That means the client
only needs to check the latest version to see if itÆs checked
out, rather than check every version.
b) No Fork Support
This profile does not include any forking support. This has the
following simplifying consequences:
- DAV:checkout-fork is ALWAYS forbidden
- DAV:checkin-fork is ALWAYS forbidden
- Only one checkout of any kind may be made. Only one working-
resource can exist, and only if the resource isnÆt checked-out
in-place. A resource may be checked out in-place only if no
working-resource exists.
- In order to find out if a resource is checked out, the client
can simply look on the VCR for the DAV:checked-out property to
see if there is an in-place checkout, and look at the latest
version to see if there is a working resource checkout. In
other words, a resource is checked out if either the checked-
out property is set on the VCR or the checkout-set property is
set on the HREF identified in the checked-in property of the
VCR.
3 Required Resources
In addition to regular WebDAV resources and collections, support for
this DeltaV subset requires three additional types of resources:
versions (a specific version of a resource), VCRs and Version
History Resources (VHR).
A server may also support working resources, which are a separate
resource type.
Since these are all separate resources, only one should be locked at
a time; that is, for any given client LOCK request, the server
should only lock the resource addressed with the URL, and not lock
associated resources. That means the client can lock their VCR (to
indicate to non-versioning clients that it is being edited) but not
lock their Working Resource at the same time (in order to be able to
send the Working Resource URL to another user and collaborate on the
next version).
Dusseault Expires April 2002 7
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
3.1 Version-Controlled Resources
Requirements:
- VCRs MUST be lockable.
- VCRs MUST support write operations because they must be
compatible with non-versioning clients (including PROPPATCH,
PUT).
- VCRs SHOULD be deletable.
3.2 Versions
Requirements:
- Versions should not be lockable.
- Versions MUST NOT support any write operation.
- Versions SHOULD be deletable.
3.3 Working Resources
Requirements:
- WRs MUST be lockable, separately from VCRs, because they can be
modified independently.
- WRs MUST support write operations.
Clients should not attempt to DELETE a working resource, in order to
make it simpler for server implementations. Instead, a working
resource can be removed by issuing an UNCHECKOUT.
3.4 Version History Resources
Requirements:
- VHRs SHOULD be lockable because they can be modified
independently.
- VHRs SHOULD support write operations.
- VHRs SHOULD support PROPPATCH of custom properties.
4 Recommended Functionality
4.1 Deleting VCRs
It should be possible to delete VCRs, because many document
management systems require the ability to cleanup in order to free
quota, remove obsolete documents, etc. Deleting a VCR should result
in the cleanup of all resources associated with the VCR: the VHR,
the working resources, and the versions. Of course if any of these
is locked or the client is not authorized to delete them, the
request can fail.
4.2 Turning Versioning Off
Dusseault Expires April 2002 8
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
The DeltaV specification is silent on how to turn versioning off for
a Version-Controlled Resource (VCR). Although this is almost never
done in source-control systems, it may easily be required in simple
document management systems. Some evidence for this point of view
is that existing document management systems have already
implemented this feature.
Thus, although the feature of turning versioning off should be
optional, it would improve interoperability to define the mechanism
by which it is done.
One previously suggested mechanism is to COPY the VCR to a new
location (which may create a new, unversioned resource) then DELETE
the VCR. Finally, the new location is renamed to the original name
with MOVE. This mechanism is inappropriate because it loses
information on the original file: creation date, the name of the
original creator, access logs, etc.
This specification recommends rather to delete the VHR in order to
turn the VCR into a non-versioned resource. This requires the
server to allow deletion of VHRs in order to support this feature.
It also requires the server to do cleanup: the VCR must be turned
into an ordinary resource, with the properties that would be
expected of an ordinary resource. For example, the "version-
history", "checked-in", "auto-version", and "checked-out" properties
must be removed from the VCR if present. Working resources
associated with the VCR should be deleted.
There are certainly circumstances where deleting the VHR should be
forbidden:
- The client is not authorized to perform this action
- The VHR, VCR, or a working resource associated with the VCR is
locked, and a lock-token was not provided or the client is not
authorized to use the lock-token.
- The server does not support this functionality
4.3 Deleting Versions
Although DeltaV does not require servers to either allow or disallow
the ability to delete versions, this specification recommends
allowing versions to be deleted by clients with sufficient
authorized permissions. When a version is deleted, the server must
clean up so that the state of the resources is consistent. That
means that the version must be deleted from any "predecessor-set"
and "successor-set" property in which it appears, and replaced by a
version which still exists. If the version is the first/root or the
last/latest version, the cleanup may need to be a little different
(the root-version property on the VHR must change), but it should
still be possible to delete the version. The first/root version is
replaced by the version that was created after it, the last/latest
version is replaced by the version that was created before it.
Dusseault Expires April 2002 9
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
The last remaining version, which is both the root and the latest
existing version, cannot be deleted. If the client finds itself in
this situation and wishes to delete the last remaining version, it
has two choices:
- Delete the entire VCR.
- Add a "dummy" version. Now the other version can be deleted
and the dummy version becomes the last remaining version, also
the root and latest existing version. This should not be
necessary as long as the server supports deleting the entire
VCR.
5 Required Methods
For these methods, error handling is done exactly as specified by
DeltaV.
5.1 VERSION-CONTROL
The version-control method is required to turn versioning on,
because in simple versioning systems typically not all documents are
required to be versioned. In this subset, the VERSION-CONTROL method
never needs a body.
VERSION-CONTROL foo.doc HTTP/1.1
Host: server.com
Full DeltaV clients may send XML bodies on VERSION-CONTROL requests
(this is part of the Workspace feature). When a server receives a
VERSION-CONTROL request that has a well-formed XML body, it should
not reject the request (either with 400 Bad Request or 415
Unsupported Media Type). Another inappropriate response would be to
simply ignore the body and successfully process the request --
because that would result in the client asking for one action and
the server performing another.
What the server must do is examine the XML body and find out if it's
simply an empty "version-control" element or not. If it's an empty
"version-control" element or contains XML elements not defined in
DeltaV, then the server can successfully process the request (recall
that RFC2518 specifies that unknown XML elements may be ignored).
On the other hand, if the "version-control" element contains
"version" elements, then the server should fail the request, and the
most appropriate failure code is 501 Not Implemented. Note that a
client should never send this request body to a server that does not
support workspaces.
5.2 CHECKOUT
In this subset, the checkout method can only be used to check out
the tip node, or latest version. This is because forking and
multiple checkouts are not part of simple versioning. (Note that it
is possible to copy the contents of an older version to a working
Dusseault Expires April 2002 10
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
resource or in-place checkout, so itÆs still possible to work from
the content of an older version).
To do checkout in-place, no body is required:
CHECKOUT foo.doc HTTP/1.1
Host: server.com:8080
To do checkout to a working resource, make the checkout request to a
version URL instead of to the VCR URL. In this case, the ôapply-to-
versionö flag is required, so a body is required for the CHECKOUT
method. The ôfork-okö flag should not be present:
CHECKOUT foo.doc.v1 HTTP/1.1
Host: server.com:8080
Content-type: text/xml
Content-Length: xxx
5.3 CHECKIN
In this subset, CHECKIN can be applied either to a VCR that is
checked out in-place, or to a working resource. The check-in always
fully checks in and updates the resource; that is, the resource does
not remain checked out, and the version-controlled resource acquires
the properties and content of the version just created.
Because checkin only has one behavior, no body is required.
CHECKIN foo.doc HTTP/1.1
Host: server.com:8080
5.4 UNCHECKOUT
UNCHECKOUT works as defined in DeltaV. Note that UNCHECKOUT only
works on checkout-in-place. In order to æuncheckoutÆ a working
resource in a DeltaV compatible manner, the client should delete the
working resource.
If the client deletes a working resource, the server must restore
the VCR and its versions to a consistent state so that some other
user can check out the resource. That means at a minimum the
ôchecked-outö property of the version that was checked out needs to
be removed now.
5.5 REPORT
Dusseault Expires April 2002 11
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
The report method is supported because of the requirement to get a
list of versions associated with a resource û the version-tree
report provides this functionality.
A good example of the REPORT method may be found in section 3.7 of
the DeltaV specification.
6 Required Properties
6.1 DAV:comment
Required: on all resources
Writable: can be written except on checked-in versions
The DAV:comment property is required on all WebDAV resources,
including regular resources, collections, VCRs and versions.
Final Draft
6.2 DAV:supported-method-set
Required: on all resources
Writable: protected
The supported method set value is the same as the OPTIONS Allow
header value. These are the recommended values for the resource
types supported by this subset.
Regular resource:
Collection:
Dusseault Expires April 2002 12
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
Version-controlled resource:
Version:
Working Resource:
Dusseault Expires April 2002 13
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
6.3 DAV:supported-report-set
Required on: All resources
Writable: protected
Since this subset only uses the version-tree report, servers only
have to list that one report and only for VCRs and versions (but are
free to support others). The recommended value for supported-report
set depends on the resource type:
Version-Controlled Resource or Version:
All other resources:
6.4 DAV:supported-live-property-set
Required on: all resources
Writable: protected.
Example: this example is for a regular, non-versioned resource, on a
server supporting locking.
Dusseault Expires April 2002 14
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
6.5 DAV:creator-displayname
Required on: all resources
Writable: Fully writable except on checked-in versions.
The DAV:creator-displayname property is required on all WebDAV
resources, including regular resources, collections, VCRs and
versions. It does not need to have a value.
[!CDATA[John Doe]]
6.6 DAV:checked-in
Required on: every checked-in VCR
Writable: Protected.
The DAV:checked in property is required on VCRs that are checked in.
In this subset, the version URL value of the property is always the
latest checked-in version.
http://server.com/url-to-version
6.7 DAV:checked-out
Required on: every checked-out VCR
Writable: Protected.
The DAV:checked-out property is required on VCRs that are checked
out. In this subset, the version URL value is always the latest
checked-in version.
http://server.com/url-to-version
6.8 DAV:auto-version
Required on: every VCR
Writable: Protected.
Although this property is required on every VCR, certain values are
discouraged. One value is recommended. In this subset, the
property MUST be protected, and should be the same for every
resource in the repository.
Dusseault Expires April 2002 15
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
- No value: this is allowed. It indicates the server does not
support auto-versioning at all. Non-versioning-aware clients
then cannot modify version-controlled resources.
- DAV:checkout-unlocked-checkin is encouraged because it has the
best interaction with clients that lock and do auto-save: it
produces only one new version for each editing session. The
checkout is performed not when the LOCK request is received,
but when the first PUT (or other write operation) is received.
The checkin is performed when the UNLOCK is received. When
clients that do not lock modify documents, the document is
checked out and checked in again along with the write
operation.
- DAV:checkout-checkin is discouraged because the with clients
that auto-save and are versioning-unaware, even if they lock
the file during a session of editing, this behavior would
produce too many versions.
- DAV:checkout and DAV:locked-checkout are discouraged because
they donÆt work with clients that are versioning-unaware. The
user would have to go out of band to do the checkin û and they
wonÆt know to. If forking is disallowed, this would prevent
all other users from checking out.
6.9 DAV:predecessor-set
Required on: every checked-out VCR and every version.
Writable: Protected
In this subset, DAV:predecessor-set contains only the URL of the
version preceding this one. This is a direct consequence of taking
the DeltaV definition for this property, then not supporting forking
or update.
http://server.com:8080/__V__1__foo.doc
6.10 DAV:successor-set
Required on: every version.
Writable: Protected.
In this subset, DAV:successor-set contains only the URL of the
version following this one.
http://server.com:8080/__V__3__foo.doc
6.11 DAV:checkout-set
Required on: the tip version (the latest checked-in version) if and
only if it is checked out.
Dusseault Expires April 2002 16
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
Writable: Protected
In this subset, DAV:checkout-set is either empty (there are no
checkouts related to this version or this version-history) or has a
single value. If the check-out is in-place, the URL in this
property is the URL of the VCR. If the check-out is to a working
resource, the URL in this property is the URL of the working
resource.
http://server.com:8080/__WR__foo.doc
6.12 DAV:version-name
Required on: every version.
Writable: Protected
In this subset, version-name has the same definition as in DeltaV.
13
6.13 DAV:auto-update
Required on: only working resources (if implemented)
Writable: protected
In this subset, the auto-update property on a working resource must
always be set, and it must always contain the URL of the VCR
associated with the working resource.
http://server.com/foo.doc
6.14 DAV:checkin-fork
Required on: all versions, working resource if implemented.
Writable: protected
Since this subset does not include forking, the value of checkin-
fork is always forbidden.
6.15 DAV:checkout-fork
Required on: all versions, working resource if implemented
Writable: protected
Since this subset does not include forking, the value of checkout-
fork is always forbidden.
Dusseault Expires April 2002 17
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
6.16 DAV:version-set
Required on: VHRs
Writable: protected
This property is fully defined in DeltaV and is unchanged in this
subset.
6.17 DAV:root-version
Required on: VHRs
Writable: protected
This property is fully defined in DeltaV and is unchanged in this
subset.
6.18 DAV:version-history
Required on: VCRs
Writable: protected
This property is fully defined in DeltaV and is unchanged in this
subset.
7 Security Considerations
This document has no new security considerations since it selects a
subset of DeltaV.
Dusseault Expires April 2002 18
DeltaV Subset for Simple Authoring October 2001
8 References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[DeltaV] Clemm, Geoffrey, Jim Amsden, Tim Ellison, Chris Kaler, Jim
Whitehead, "Versioning Extensions to WebDAV", RFC TBD, October
2001.
[RFC2518] Goland, Y., E. Whitehead, A. Faizi, S. Carter and D.
Jensen, "HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring -- WebDAV",
RFC2518, February 1999.
9 Author's Addresses
Lisa Dusseault
Xythos
77 Maiden Lane, Suite 200 Phone: 1-415-248-9004
San Francisco, CA, USA Email: lisa@xythos.com
Dusseault Expires April 2002 19