Network Working Group P. Saint-Andre
Internet-Draft JSF
Expires: December 25, 2006 J. Hildebrand
Jabber, Inc.
B. Wyman
PubSub.com
June 23, 2006
Transporting Atom Notifications over the Extensible Messaging and
Presence Protocol (XMPP)
draft-saintandre-atompub-notify-05
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 25, 2006.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
Abstract
This memo describes a method for notifying interested parties about
changes in syndicated information encapsulated in the Atom feed
format, where such notifications are delivered via an extension to
the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) for publish-
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB June 2006
subscribe functionality.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2 Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Process Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2 Notification of Entry Creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.3 Notification of Entry Modification . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.4 Notification of Entry Deletion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3. Implementation Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.1 Generation of ItemIDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.2 Handling of Duplicate Entries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.3 Notifications Matching Multiple Subscriptions . . . . . . 13
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.1 Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.2 Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . 17
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB June 2006
1. Introduction
1.1 Overview
The Atom Publishing Format and Protocol Working Group has developed
two technologies relevant to content syndication:
1. An XML data format for syndication of information about
periodically-updated resources (such as weblog entries and news
stories) available on the World Wide Web (see [ATOM-FORMAT]).
2. A protocol for publishing, editing, deleting, and otherwise
managing such resources (see [ATOM-PROTOCOL]).
Content syndication follows a classic "observer" or "publish-
subscribe" software design pattern: a person or application publishes
information to a "channel", and an event notification (or the data
itself) is broadcasted to all those who are interested in knowing
when such information is published or modified. On the Internet
today, publication of periodically-updated resources is handled by
means of standard technologies such as [HTTP], and it is not
envisioned that this will change since [ATOM-PROTOCOL] specifies the
use of HTTP for publication. However, existing methods for learning
that a resource has been updated are currently limited to "polling"
for changes via HTTP, which is inherently inefficient. What is
needed is a technology that can be relied on to "push" information
only when a resource undergoes a state change, and only to those who
are interested in learning about such state changes.
One possible technology for doing so is email, since [SMTP] provides
a way to initiate the sending of information from "publishers" to
"subscribers" (think, for example, of email lists such as those used
to announce newly-published RFCs). While email is one possible
solution, it is not necessarily the best solution for Atom; in
particular, [ATOM-FORMAT] defines an XML data format for content
syndication, which implies that it might be beneficial to use a
native XML delivery mechanism rather than to attach a special XML
media type to email messages. Thankfully, a specialized XML delivery
protocol has been developed through the IETF: the Extensible
Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) as specified in [XMPP-CORE].
XMPP has the added benefit of being optimized for near-real-time data
delivery, which may be important in applications of Atom that require
subscribers to be notified about syndicated content in a highly
timely manner.
While the semantics of a normal XMPP element may be
suitable for Atom content notifications, there also exists an XMPP
extension that provides more structured communications in the context
of information "channels" or "nodes" of the kind that are used in
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB June 2006
content syndication. This extension is specified in [XMPP-PUBSUB]
and may be especially useful for delivering notifications related to
changes in Atom resources. Therefore, this memo describes a method
for notifying interested parties about changes in syndicated
information encapsulated in the Atom feed format, where such
notifications are delivered via the XMPP publish-subscribe extension.
1.2 Terminology
This document inherits terminology from [ATOM-FORMAT], [XMPP-CORE],
and [XMPP-PUBSUB].
The capitalized key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL",
"SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT
RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be
interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [TERMS].
2. Process Flows
2.1 Overview
The following process flows demonstrate how Atom-formatted data
(specifically, feed entries) can be delivered using the XMPP pubsub
extension. The actors in these process flows are an application and
one or more XMPP users. The application acts as a translator between
HTTP and XMPP, since it generates XMPP pubsub requests when certain
events occur at an Atom-aware HTTP service (e.g., an HTTP POST to
create a new dynamic resource). The XMPP pubsub service then
translates those pubsub requests into notifications that are sent to
a potentially large number of XMPP users who have subscribed to such
events (e.g., who have asked to receive an XMPP notification whenever
a new dynamic resource is created for a certain Atom "channel"). Of
course, an XMPP user is not necessarily a human, and could represent
another application on the XMPP network (e.g., a chatroom, a bot, or
a content management system).
Note well that an HTTP user (e.g., a weblog author) would still
publish information using the methods defined in [ATOM-PROTOCOL]; the
process flows described herein enable the HTTP service with which an
HTTP user interacts to generate notifications that are delivered via
an XMPP pubsub service to a potentially large number of XMPP users
who want to receive such information.
We can visualize the architecture as follows:
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB June 2006
+-----------+
| HTTP User |
+-----------+
|
| [Atom API]
|
+--------------+
| HTTP Service |
+--------------+
|
| [XMPP Pubsub]
|
+---------------------+
| XMPP Pubsub Service |
+---------------------+
|
| [XMPP Pubsub]
|
+--------+-------+
| |
+-----------+ +-----------+
| XMPP User | | XMPP User |
+-----------+ +-----------+
In the examples shown below, we stipulate the following particulars:
o The XMPP address of the HTTP Service is "http-
service.example.org".
o The XMPP address of the XMPP Pubsub Service is
"pubsub.example.com".
o The NodeID of the XMPP pubsub node to which the HTTP Service
publishes and to which the XMPP Users subscribe is "an-atom-node".
o The ItemID of the XMPP pubsub item published by the HTTP Service
is "70b2a83be71dfca04df91133d953fb22b41b4267".
o The XMPP addresses of the XMPP Users who are subscribed to the
node are "alice@example.net" and "bob@example.com".
2.2 Notification of Entry Creation
An implementation MUST support notifications related to creation of
an entry.
When a content author publishes a new dynamic resource, many entities
may be interested in learning that the resource is now available.
The process flow is as follows:
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB June 2006
o Author publishes a new entry to the HTTP service via the Atom API.
o The HTTP service sends data for the new Atom entry in an XMPP
pubsub "publish" request to a specific node at the XMPP pubsub
service. (Note: If the entry may be copied from one feed to
another, e.g., in the generation of "synthetic" feeds, the entry
SHOULD contain an atom:source element to ensure consistent
metadata.)
o The XMPP pubsub service sends an XMPP message notification to each
XMPP entity that is subscribed to the pubsub node.
The result is that the XMPP subscribers will receive something close
to real-time notification whenever a new feed entry has been
published.
Obviously the first step is out of scope for this memo, since it is
described in [ATOM-PROTOCOL]. The XMPP protocols for the last two
steps are shown below.
First the HTTP service sends an XMPP pubsub "publish" request to the
XMPP pubsub service:
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB June 2006
Example Feedtag:example.org,2003:home2003-12-13T18:30:02ZJohn DoeAtom-Powered Robots Run AmuckAsimov's First Law horribly violated!tag:example.org,2003:entry-323972003-12-13T18:30:02Z2003-12-13T18:30:02Z
The XMPP pubsub service then sends a pubsub notification to each XMPP
subscriber; depending on pubsub node configuration, the notification
may or may not contain the Atom payload (we assume here that the
payload will be included).
Example Feed
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB June 2006
tag:example.org,2003:home2003-12-13T18:30:02ZJohn DoeAtom-Powered Robots Run AmuckAsimov's First Law horribly violated!tag:example.org,2003:entry-323972003-12-13T18:30:02Z2003-12-13T18:30:02ZExample Feedtag:example.org,2003:home2003-12-13T18:30:02ZJohn DoeAtom-Powered Robots Run AmuckAsimov's First Law horribly violated!tag:example.org,2003:entry-323972003-12-13T18:30:02Z
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB June 2006
2003-12-13T18:30:02Z
2.3 Notification of Entry Modification
An implementation SHOULD support notifications related to
modification of an entry.
When a content author updates an existing dynamic resource, many
entities may be interested in learning that the resource has been
modified. The process flow is as follows:
o Author updates an existing entry at the HTTP service via the Atom
API.
o The HTTP service sends data for the updated Atom entry in an XMPP
pubsub "publish" request to a specific node at the XMPP pubsub
service, specifying the same Item ID as previously supplied.
(Note: If the entry may be copied from one feed to another, e.g.,
in the generation of "synthetic" feeds, the entry SHOULD contain
an atom:source element to ensure consistent metadata.)
o The XMPP pubsub service sends an XMPP message notification to each
XMPP entity that is subscribed to the pubsub node.
First the HTTP service sends an XMPP pubsub "publish" request to the
XMPP pubsub service (note the modified title and time):
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB June 2006
Example Feedtag:example.org,2003:home2003-12-13T18:30:02ZJohn DoeAtom-Powered Robots Run AmokAsimov's First Law horribly violated!tag:example.org,2003:entry-323972003-12-13T18:30:02Z2003-12-13T18:31:03Z
Subject to node configuration and/or subscription options, each XMPP
subscriber would then receive a pubsub notification, which may or may
not contain the Atom payload.
Example Feedtag:example.org,2003:home2003-12-13T18:30:02ZJohn DoeAtom-Powered Robots Run AmokAsimov's First Law horribly violated!tag:example.org,2003:entry-323972003-12-13T18:30:02Z2003-12-13T18:31:03ZExample Feedtag:example.org,2003:home2003-12-13T18:30:02ZJohn DoeAtom-Powered Robots Run AmokAsimov's First Law horribly violated!tag:example.org,2003:entry-323972003-12-13T18:30:02Z2003-12-13T18:31:03Z
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB June 2006
2.4 Notification of Entry Deletion
An implementation MAY support notifications related to deletion of an
entry.
If a content author deletes an existing dynamic resource, many
entities may be interested in learning that the resource is no longer
available. The process flow is as follows:
o Author deletes an existing entry at the HTTP service via the Atom
API.
o The HTTP service sends an XMPP pubsub "retract" request to a
specific node at the XMPP pubsub service, specifying the same Item
ID as previously supplied.
o The XMPP pubsub service sends an XMPP message notification to each
XMPP entity that is subscribed to the pubsub node.
First the HTTP service sends an XMPP pubsub "retract" request to the
XMPP pubsub service:
Subject to node configuration and/or subscription options, each XMPP
subscriber would then receive a pubsub notification that the item was
deleted.
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB June 2006
3. Implementation Notes
3.1 Generation of ItemIDs
The pubsub ItemIDs MUST conform to the rules defined in [XMPP-
PUBSUB]. One possible method for generating a unique ItemID is to
concatenate the XMPP address of the pubsub service, the pubsub node
to which the item is published, and the atom:id of the feed entry,
then hash the resulting string using the [SHA1] algorithm.
3.2 Handling of Duplicate Entries
It is the responsibility of the receiving application to remove or
ignore duplicate entries that might be received from multiple feeds.
3.3 Notifications Matching Multiple Subscriptions
An XMPP entity may subscribe to a publish-subscribe node multiple
times (e.g., once for each of several keywords), in which case a
single notification may match one or more subscriptions. In order to
specify which of one or more subscriptions are matched, the
notification message SHOULD specify the subscription IDs using the
header syntax defined in [XMPP-SHIM] and the "pubsub#subid" header
defined in [XMPP-PUBSUB], as shown at the end of the following
example.
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB June 2006
Example Feedtag:example.org,2003:home2003-12-13T18:30:02ZJohn DoeAtom-Powered Robots Run AmokAsimov's First Law horribly violated!tag:example.org,2003:entry-323972003-12-13T18:30:02Z2003-12-13T18:31:03Z123-abc004-yyy
4. Security Considerations
Detailed security considerations for the relevant protocols profiled
in this memo are given in [ATOM-FORMAT], [XMPP-CORE], and [XMPP-
PUBSUB]; this memo introduces no new security concerns above and
beyond those described in the foregoing specifications.
5. References
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB June 2006
5.1 Normative References
[ATOM-FORMAT]
Nottingham, M. and R. Sayre, "The Atom Syndication
Format", RFC 4287, December 2005.
[TERMS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[XMPP-CORE]
Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence
Protocol (XMPP): Core", RFC 3920, October 2004.
[XMPP-PUBSUB]
Millard, P., Saint-Andre, P., and R. Meijer, "Publish-
Subscribe", JSF JEP 0060, June 2006.
5.2 Informative References
[ATOM-PROTOCOL]
Hora, B. and J. Gregorio, "The Atom Publishing Protocol",
draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-08 (work in progress),
February 2006.
[HTTP] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H.,
Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext
Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.
[SHA1] Eastlake, D. and P. Jones, "US Secure Hash Algorithm 1
(SHA1)", RFC 3174, September 2001.
[SMTP] Klensin, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 2821,
April 2001.
[XMPP-SHIM]
Saint-Andre, P. and J. Hildebrand, "Stanza Headers and
Internet Metadata (SHIM)", JSF JEP 0131, August 2005.
Authors' Addresses
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
Email: stpeter@jabber.org
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB June 2006
Joe Hildebrand
Jabber, Inc.
Email: jhildebrand@jabber.com
Bob Wyman
PubSub.com
Email: bob@wyman.us
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft ATOM-PUBSUB June 2006
Intellectual Property Statement
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Disclaimer of Validity
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006). This document is subject
to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and
except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
Acknowledgment
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Saint-Andre, et al. Expires December 25, 2006 [Page 17]