IETF Logo Mail Archive

[16NG] Request for review of draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802-dot-16 from a DSL perspective

g_e_montenegro@yahoo.com Wed, 19 November 2008 00:01 UTC

Return-Path: <16ng-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 16ng-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-16ng-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3265D3A694E; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:01:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 16ng@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 16ng@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68673A694E for <16ng@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:01:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RqYzIjF00iAl for <16ng@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:01:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web81901.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web81901.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.180]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FA9F3A680F for <16ng@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:01:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 86426 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Nov 2008 00:01:55 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=yfWsHtxYMSKqgWE7gTePZKzr/+h57SioRnBYpXVa8ab3fei2P0FDtR5+O/o/VmZ4Cdx6QLT96ZDPgBC8tEI1mHc2fZRbdGrwBUMR81/pc5nsO3WsPy3sGZRXLUKcR/wyKrvqKJ9MTiGMLYtu5ZTp6LSR54xwavLObkv+SQMipsY=;
Received: from [130.129.95.139] by web81901.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:01:55 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1155.20 YahooMailWebService/0.7.218.2
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:01:55 -0800
From: g_e_montenegro@yahoo.com
To: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>, Frank Xia <xiayangsong@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <817000.84300.qm@web81901.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802-dot-16@tools.ietf.org, 16ng@ietf.org
Subject: [16NG] Request for review of draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802-dot-16 from a DSL perspective
X-BeenThere: 16ng@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: 16ng working group discussion list <16ng.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/16ng>
List-Post: <mailto:16ng@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng>, <mailto:16ng-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 16ng-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Mark and Frank,

Your names have been offered as people who are familiar with DSL network deployments.

We would like to request your review of a 16ng draft that may have some similarities with those deployments:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-16ng-ip-over-ethernet-over-802-dot-16-07

This draft is in AD review, and Jari asked the WG to close the loop on this draft with DSL-savvy folks. The idea is not that they should match, but that DSL deployments have some similarities, hence you might have good insight and feedback on this draft.

Please feel free to forward to other DSL experts you may be aware of. If at all possible, we would like to get some feedback by December 12, 2008.

Thanks in advance,

Gabriel and Daniel, 16ng co-chairs

_______________________________________________
16NG mailing list
16NG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email