Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental concerns about 6lowpan ND

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental concerns about 6lowpan ND

To: 6lowpan <6lowpan at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental concerns about 6lowpan ND
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo at tzi.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:22:45 +0200
Delivered-to: 6lowpan at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <4AD4E311.8090004 at innovationslab.net>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <B6DBCBF27DEB1047AD57F03F217B106155FB0E at XMB-AMS-113.cisco.com> <B1F71F71-E743-4D01-89F7-60F00A82CCE8 at cisco.com> <4AD4E311.8090004 at innovationslab.net>

On Oct 13, 2009, at 22:29, Brian Haberman wrote:

Hi JP & 6lowpan WG,


Ah, the fun of postings stuck in the non-subscriber queue.

See my reply from yesterday 1430 UTC.

Gruesse, Carsten

References:
- [6lowpan] Fundamental concerns about 6lowpan ND
  - From: Julien Abeille (jabeille)
- Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental concerns about 6lowpan ND
  - From: JP Vasseur
- Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental concerns about 6lowpan ND
  - From: Brian Haberman

Prev by Date: Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: (1)Addressresolution is a waste of energy
Next by Date: Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: (1) Addressresolution is a waste of energy
Previous by thread: Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental concerns about 6lowpan ND
Next by thread: Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental concerns about 6lowpan ND
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.