Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental concerns about 6lowpan ND
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental concerns about 6lowpan ND



On Oct 15, 2009, at 09:24, Mathilde Durvy (mdurvy) wrote:

[Mathilde] I guess for me an adaptation layer should not intercept
messages or generate new messages. This is why I think the philosophy of
header compression and 6lowpan-ND is very different.

I can assure you that ROHC implementations intercept and generate new messages all the time...

But yes, I was stretching it a little.
I still think the analogy leads to useful insights.

Gruesse, Carsten


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.