Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: which procedures from which RFCs assume link transitivity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: which procedures from which RFCs assume link transitivity

To: "Julien Abeille (jabeille)" <jabeille at cisco.com>, "Zach Shelby" <zach at sensinode.com>
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: which procedures from which RFCs assume link transitivity
From: "Julien Abeille (jabeille)" <jabeille at cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:54:46 +0200
Authentication-results: ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo at tzi.org>, 6lowpan <6lowpan at ietf.org>
Delivered-to: 6lowpan at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jabeille at cisco.com; l=55; q=dns/txt; s=amsiport01001; t=1255679712; x=1256889312; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20"Julien=20Abeille=20(jabeille)"=20<jabeille at cisc o.com>|Subject:=20RE:=20[6lowpan]=20Fundamental=20assumpt ions=20of=206lowpan-nd-06:=20which=20procedures=20from=20 which=20RFCs=20assume=20link=20transitivity|Date:=20Fri, =2016=20Oct=202009=2009:54:46=20+0200|Message-ID:=20<B6DB CBF27DEB1047AD57F03F217B10616073C0 at XMB-AMS-113.cisco.com> |To:=20"Julien=20Abeille=20(jabeille)"=20<jabeille at cisco. com>,=0D=0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20"Zach=20Shelby"=20<zac h at sensinode.com>|Cc:=20"Carsten=20Bormann"=20<cabo at tzi.or g>,=20"6lowpan"=20<6lowpan at ietf.org>|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |In-Reply-To:=20<B6DBCBF27DEB1047AD57F03F217B10615B02B8 at X MB-AMS-113.cisco.com>|References:=20<E61CCB36-89A3-4B13-A 931-940E524E185C at tzi.org><B6DBCBF27DEB1047AD57F03F217B106 15AFFAC at XMB-AMS-113.cisco.com><249145E5-C515-43E0-8CC7-01 3E450ED24F at tzi.org><B6DBCBF27DEB1047AD57F03F217B10615B007 2 at XMB-AMS-113.cisco.com><C2F92C8A-1D2F-4216-B596-676B6E76 6B3C at tzi.org><B6DBCBF27DEB1047AD57F03F217B10615B00C3 at XMB- AMS-113.cisco.com><A9773CAA-A9A5-4FDF-97A1-72AB9AF473C1 at s ensinode.com>=20<B6DBCBF27DEB1047AD57F03F217B10615B02B8 at X MB-AMS-113.cisco.com>; bh=rGhlUzgktEcBWZaVE5oglAxqCe/jvbKwJqObY8hPQOs=; b=iB7fG6aZBXFNIhKO4rjL4ukVbLuoi/wwCCLfB4tcqnxajbdy5gj4xRKc MsXSCqaHeDBNATzind3WHfauAJGjPVviOAhEkHhfGWB8uWsd4v+eHab/o P5h5xqrikE7djg3L8WuMbQ1PgFJ3e7BtW1if2x+7FBvBghVMfzNHpEGgY U=;
In-reply-to: <B6DBCBF27DEB1047AD57F03F217B10615B02B8 at XMB-AMS-113.cisco.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E61CCB36-89A3-4B13-A931-940E524E185C at tzi.org><B6DBCBF27DEB1047AD57F03F217B10615AFFAC at XMB-AMS-113.cisco.com><249145E5-C515-43E0-8CC7-013E450ED24F at tzi.org><B6DBCBF27DEB1047AD57F03F217B10615B0072 at XMB-AMS-113.cisco.com><C2F92C8A-1D2F-4216-B596-676B6E766B3C at tzi.org><B6DBCBF27DEB1047AD57F03F217B10615B00C3 at XMB-AMS-113.cisco.com><A9773CAA-A9A5-4FDF-97A1-72AB9AF473C1 at sensinode.com> <B6DBCBF27DEB1047AD57F03F217B10615B02B8 at XMB-AMS-113.cisco.com>
Thread-index: AcpM/nUrgCzpt2SaRMe9uSi9Bq70fgAbDjowADLEbQA=
Thread-topic: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: which procedures from which RFCs assume link transitivity

Hi all,

By assume I mean require.

Best,
Julien

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: which procedures from which RFCs assume link transitivity
  - From: Carsten Bormann

References:
- [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: (1) Address resolution is a waste of energy
  - From: Carsten Bormann
- Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: (1) Addressresolution is a waste of energy
  - From: Julien Abeille (jabeille)
- Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: (1) Addressresolution is a waste of energy
  - From: Carsten Bormann
- Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: (1) Addressresolution is a waste of energy
  - From: Julien Abeille (jabeille)
- Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: (1) Addressresolution is a waste of energy
  - From: Carsten Bormann
- Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: (1) Addressresolution is a waste of energy
  - From: Julien Abeille (jabeille)
- Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: (1) Addressresolution is a waste of energy
  - From: Zach Shelby
- Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: (1) Addressresolution is a waste of energy
  - From: Julien Abeille (jabeille)

Prev by Date: Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: (1) Addressresolution is a waste of energy
Next by Date: Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: which procedures from which RFCs assume link transitivity
Previous by thread: Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: (1) Addressresolution is a waste of energy
Next by thread: Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: which procedures from which RFCs assume link transitivity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [6lowpan] Fundamental assumptions of 6lowpan-nd-06: which procedures from which RFCs assume link transitivity

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.