[6tisch] request for agenda item slot for 6tisch conf call Fri Dec 19, 2014

Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com> Tue, 09 December 2014 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07751A6FC6 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 07:54:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O7867sY7sqTa for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 07:54:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x234.google.com (mail-ig0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B54291A701C for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 07:54:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id h15so1150430igd.13 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:54:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5FrUmeGbY6su5P2XNxXtqjiGp96tK+nf8BBVlDl040s=; b=TgVYeAjdzgcahpV8yzbvBeE5PQMPDbvZfTUx2kBdTPHY/LSeIN/uaisvnnlGUNLmIz TYfbbrEXm8tp/DRWJ9HxhPm8FQ1INZULXeT0s8UIF8u+fyFouoEDexSFQKFUEYmHKAmY 8v5HmBjMUvELB+GgRoXK/oZ7NS0z6Xc7hk1iMcrIExMb/lWoOUB14jjmJgLMihS7++I9 FJnVLR9nWX8qfzOzSnyRHN5U3OOE8J/vZATownUUkkSp7a8szn2PQCdgpLnwN+rXY8EW pPhCC+dhngq7ckaSfvp7zpyxmqaRgR0Z5fBl/U2oQWT8mcCfxA+Cx2ZMLgQPxgHmD8M2 qkAw==
X-Received: by 10.50.114.97 with SMTP id jf1mr2945034igb.29.1418140484772; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:54:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] (CPE7cb21b2cb904-CM7cb21b2cb901.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com. [99.231.49.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hi15sm5632377igb.19.2014.12.09.07.54.44 for <6tisch@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:54:44 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54871B40.5080301@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:54:40 -0500
From: Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/WkD6un5hTEh5Th9DaeX3PDW2vCw
Subject: [6tisch] request for agenda item slot for 6tisch conf call Fri Dec 19, 2014
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:54:48 -0000

Dear colleagues:

During the 6tisch meeting of IETF-91, I asked the question how one would 
be sure the 802.15.4 revision spec would satisfy the needs of 6tisch. At 
the time, it was suggested that 6tisch-802.15 liaison would take care of 
this.

I have a question here, though, since I have never seen any discussion 
on this "liaison" in 6tisch. Shouldn't one have more transparency here 
of who is representing 6tisch here and that this would liaison would 
really addresss 6tisch's technical interests? I know that the set of 
people participating in 6tisch and 802.15 does have a non-empty 
intersection (i.e., some participate in both). While I do acknowledge 
the experience of those people, this does not necessarily mean they can 
speak for 6tisch's interests, at least not without consensus.

I do realize there is some tension here, since IEEE operates in a 
different way than IETF, but I think this is an important enough topic 
to raise this.

I would like to request the 6tisch Chairs to put this on the agenda of 
the next 6tisch conf call, on Fri December 19, 2014, 11am EST, so that 
we can have some more clarity here.

Best regards, Rene

==
[excerpt personal notes RS of 6tisch meeting, Nov 13, 2014, Honolulu]
802.15.4e: revision
RS: make sure 802.15.4e fits our needs {6tisch-802.15 liaison}

-- 
email: rstruik.ext@gmail.com | Skype: rstruik
cell: +1 (647) 867-5658 | US: +1 (415) 690-7363