[86attendees] Alternative PKI Models Side Meeting

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 05 March 2013 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: 86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409D721F8742 for <86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 06:19:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id stfux2DbejEJ for <86attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 06:19:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4129D21F86E4 for <86attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 06:19:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.35]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lv83w-1UvBeM3nXu-010OXk for <86attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:19:52 +0100
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Mar 2013 14:19:52 -0000
Received: from dslb-188-107-233-245.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO [192.168.178.169]) [188.107.233.245] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 05 Mar 2013 15:19:52 +0100
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19j8CV+h1hjQFqubm/1bXJOHOX4FkL2I5TGLbN3yv BpTAfWFga0T2KS
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:19:51 +0200
Message-Id: <FEE62AF6-E5E0-4D41-82A1-9015393C98AC@gmx.net>
To: 86attendees@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Subject: [86attendees] Alternative PKI Models Side Meeting
X-BeenThere: 86attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <86attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/86attendees>, <mailto:86attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/86attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:86attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:86attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/86attendees>, <mailto:86attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:19:55 -0000

Hi all,

When our security ADs scheduled the BOF on Certificate Transparency (CT) [0] in Atlanta (IETF-85), some expressed interest in continuing the discussions regarding improvements to the Web PKI. In the IAB, we have been brainstorming about holding a workshop to progress the topic, but with the announcement of the NIST workshop on Improving Trust in the Online Marketplace [1] we decided to postpone our workshop.

The upcoming IETF-86 meeting is, however, a good opportunity to discuss whether there is a need for additional investigations. In particular, we have been wondering whether the IETF community has the same level of understanding regarding the requirements, goals, and the design assumptions. The emerging evolutionary alterations to the Web PKI model -- i.e., DANE, CT, TACK, etc. -- superficially fit the model, but they alter it in subtle and interesting ways.

If you are interested in a discussion you are welcome to join our side meeting on Thursday evening (at 8pm*) in room Boca 4 (the IAB Office).

Ciao
Hannes & JeffH

References: 
[0] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey
[1] http://www.nist.gov/itl/csd/ct/ca_workshop.cfm

PS: We picked 8pm since some of you may want to stop by at the Bits-N-Bites event.