[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1788)
- To: rray at pesa.com, Rajesh.Abbi at alcatel.com, dromasca at avaya.com, rbonica at juniper.net, sneedmike at hotmail.com, Menachem.Dodge at ecitele.com
- Subject: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1788)
- From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 21:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: adslmib at ietf.org, smadar_t at rad.com, rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
- Delivered-to: adslmib at core3.amsl.com
- List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/adslmib>
- List-help: <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: ADSLMIB <adslmib.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:adslmib@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib>, <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib>, <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3728,
"Definitions of Managed Objects for Very High Speed Digital Subscriber Lines (VDSL)".
--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3728&eid=1788
--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Smadar Tauber <smadar_t at rad.com>
Section: Global
Original Text
-------------
Example:
vdslPhysCurrSnrMgn OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32 (-127..127)
UNITS "0.25dBm"
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Noise Margin as seen by this Vtu with respect to its
received signal in 0.25dB. The effective range is
-31.75 to +31.75 dB."
REFERENCE "T1E1.4/2000-009R3, Part 1, common spec"
::= { vdslPhysEntry 5 }
vdslPhysCurrAtn OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32 (0..255)
UNITS "0.25dBm"
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Measured difference in the total power transmitted by
the peer Vtu and the total power received by this Vtu.
The effective range is 0 to +63.75 dB."
Corrected Text
--------------
UNITS statement (dBm) does not match units appearing in DESCRIPTION text (dB).
I think 'dB' are the right units for the objects above, but one can check that. Anyway, it is clear that there should not be the existing mismatch.
Same problem for more MIB objects in the RFC.
Notes
-----
Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
--------------------------------------
RFC3728 (draft-ietf-adslmib-vdsl-12)
--------------------------------------
Title : Definitions of Managed Objects for Very High Speed Digital Subscriber Lines (VDSL)
Publication Date : February 2004
Author(s) : B. Ray, R. Abbi
Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source : ADSL MIB
Area : Operations and Management
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG