[Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1791)

[RFC Errata System <rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org>]

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3728,
"Definitions of Managed Objects for Very High Speed Digital Subscriber Lines (VDSL)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3728&eid=1791

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Smadar Tauber <smadar_t at rad.com>

Section: Global

Original Text
-------------
UNITS definition of the following MIB objects, should change from dBm to dB.
That will also fix the conflict with the units appearing in the Description of these MIB objects (dB).

vdslPhysCurrSnrMgn
vdslPhysCurrAtn
vdslLineConfDownMaxSnrMgn
vdslLineConfDownMinSnrMgn
vdslLineConfDownTargetSnrMgn
vdslLineConfUpMaxSnrMgn
vdslLineConfUpMinSnrMgn
vdslLineConfUpTargetSnrMgn

Example of original text:
   vdslPhysCurrSnrMgn OBJECT-TYPE
       SYNTAX       Integer32 (-127..127)
       UNITS        "0.25dBm"
       MAX-ACCESS   read-only
       STATUS       current
       DESCRIPTION
           "Noise Margin as seen by this Vtu with respect to its
           received signal in 0.25dB.  The effective range is
           -31.75 to +31.75 dB."
       REFERENCE    "T1E1.4/2000-009R3, Part 1, common spec"
        ::= { vdslPhysEntry 5 }

Corrected Text
--------------
Example of corrected text:
   vdslPhysCurrSnrMgn OBJECT-TYPE
       SYNTAX       Integer32 (-127..127)
       UNITS        "0.25dB"
       MAX-ACCESS   read-only
       STATUS       current
       DESCRIPTION
           "Noise Margin as seen by this Vtu with respect to its
           received signal in 0.25dB.  The effective range is
           -31.75 to +31.75 dB."
       REFERENCE    "T1E1.4/2000-009R3, Part 1, common spec"
        ::= { vdslPhysEntry 5 }


Notes
-----
This Errata replaces errata 1788 (rejected because it did not include list of all MIB objects having this problem and could not be edited). 
It was decided by the adslmib Forum, that the solution should be as described by this Errata.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC3728 (draft-ietf-adslmib-vdsl-12)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Definitions of Managed Objects for Very High Speed Digital Subscriber Lines (VDSL)
Publication Date    : February 2004
Author(s)           : B. Ray, R. Abbi
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : ADSL MIB
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG