[alto] Chair summary: Status on ALTO protocol document
"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Wed, 10 July 2013 19:12 UTC
Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0173E21F9D8F for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YSqNbf3rAH85 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4A421F9D65 for <alto@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.12]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r6AJCRZn017790 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <alto@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:12:27 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.61]) by usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id r6AJCQne014653 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <alto@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:12:27 -0500
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.237.229]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id r6AJCQW6028411 for <alto@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:12:26 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <51DDB316.5090409@bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:16:38 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: alto <alto@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.12
Subject: [alto] Chair summary: Status on ALTO protocol document
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 19:12:36 -0000
Folks: As you are aware, Enrico and my aim has been to get the ALTO
protocol document out of the WG to the IESG as soon as possible.
We will like to thank the ALTO protocol editor team for taking the
time to engage the WG and close open issues in preparation for an
upcoming revision (-17) that should be available in the archives on
Monday, at the latest.
It seems that we are well within the sight of the proverbial light at
the end of the tunnel. While it would have been desirable to be a bit
ahead in the process of sending the draft to IESG as we go into Berlin,
it is nonetheless gratifying to witness the protocol mature further.
Besides the editors, Enrico and I thank all the WG participants that
have contributed time and discussion points to make it so.
Post interim meeting on June 20, 2013, all open issues have been
resolved. To wit, these are outlined below.
- Jan's questions on security consideration thread [1] are
adequately answered by Sebastian's response.
- Sebastian's thread on the introduction section [2] appears
to have reached consensus with Richard Y.'s response [3]
that contains suggested text changes.
- The cost map dependency thread [4] seem to have been
concluded as well by Richard Y.'s summary of the discussion [5].
- The minor comment thread opened by Sabine [6] also seemed to
have reached consensus.
[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg01929.html
[2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg01931.html
[3] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg01961.html
[4] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg01934.html
[5] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg01964.html
[6] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg01937.html
See you in Berlin!
Cheers,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
- [alto] Chair summary: Status on ALTO protocol doc… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [alto] Chair summary: Status on ALTO protocol… Richard Alimi