Re: [ANCP] ANCP MIB

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca at avaya.com>]

Hi Stefaan,

For the two ANCP MIB modules, do you plan to request the allocation one
root OID under mib-2 or two? RFC 4181 believes two (and more down the
road if needed) is better. 

Dan


 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ancp-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ancp-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Stefaan DE CNODDER
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 10:49 AM
> To: ancp at ietf.org
> Subject: [ANCP] ANCP MIB
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In revising the ANCP MIB for access nodes, there will be 
> mainly minor updates but maybe two update deserves somewhat 
> more attention:
> 
> 1) The textual conventions defining the TCs GsmpSubVersion 
> and AncpSessionCapabilities (previously named 
> AncpAnSessionCapabilities), will be taken out the ANCP MIB 
> module for access nodes, and will be put in a separate MIB 
> module (also defined in the same document).
> 
> 2) The ANCP MIB modules (we have 2 now) will not be put 
> directly under mib-2, but under ancpMIB.  ANCP will have its 
> own node ancpMIB and all ANCP MIB mdoules can be put under mib-2.
> 
> These changes will be done (except if someone has another 
> opinion) to make the ANCP MIBs more general, to better 
> support other ANCP related MIB modules in the future.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefaan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ANCP mailing list
> ANCP at ietf.org
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp
> 
_______________________________________________
ANCP mailing list
ANCP at ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp