[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ANCP] ANCP MIB
This looks fine.
Again, I did not do a full review of the MIB, so I may discover other
things down the road.
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DE CNODDER Stefaan
> [mailto:stefaan.de_cnodder at alcatel-lucent.be]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 7:44 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Mark Townsley; ancp at ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [ANCP] ANCP MIB
>
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Then I think the current MIB is fine because currently we have in the
> MIB:
>
> IMPORTS
> GsmpVersion, GsmpNameType, GsmpPartitionIdType
> FROM GSMP-MIB -- [RFC3295]
>
> So that is exactly what you mean what should be done?
>
> Regards,
> Stefaan
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca at avaya.com]
> Sent: maandag 17 maart 2008 17:57
> To: DE CNODDER Stefaan; Mark Townsley; ancp at ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [ANCP] ANCP MIB
>
> It is even simpler than I thought. You just need to IMPORT
> the three TCs from the GSMP MIB (not the whole MIB, only the TCs).
>
> Disclaimer - I did not yet fully review the ANCP MIB so other
> things may pop up at the time of the review.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: DE CNODDER Stefaan
> > [mailto:stefaan.de_cnodder at alcatel-lucent.be]
> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 6:47 PM
> > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Mark Townsley; ancp at ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: [ANCP] ANCP MIB
> >
> >
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > The ANCP MIB only uses some textual conventions defined in the GSMP
> > MIB.
> > Only 3 TCs in the GSMP MIB are used in the ANCP MIB:
> > GsmpVersion, GsmpNameType, and GsmpPartitionIdType.
> Nothing else from
>
> > the GSMP MIB is used.
> >
> > The current ANCP MIB is the ANCP MIB for Access Nodes (AN).
> > This MIB also defines 2 TCs in addition to the TCs in the GSMP MIB.
> >
> > These TCs from the GSMP MIB can also be useful for other ANCP MIBs
> > like the ANCP MIB for Network Access Servers (NASs), which
> also needs
> > the 2 TCs defined for ANCP MIB for AN.
> >
> > So would it therefore be better to make a separate MIB module with
> > only TCs to be imported by all ANCP MIBs, and also put the 3 TCs of
> > the GSMP MIB in this MIB module, or is it just fine to
> IMPORT the GSMP
>
> > MIB as currently done?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Stefaan
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ancp-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ancp-bounces at ietf.org]
> On Behalf
> > Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> > Sent: vrijdag 14 maart 2008 13:48
> > To: Mark Townsley; ancp at ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [ANCP] ANCP MIB
> >
> > Sure, using MODULE-COMPLIANCE clauses we can point to what
> groups or
> > objects in the GSMP MIB an ANCP device needs to support.
> Can somebody
> > send me a short mail pointing to what out of the current
> GSMP MIB is
> > considered useful and what not, and what is the new
> information that
> > needs to be modeled in the new ANCP MIB?
> >
> > We can also arrange for a short call next week to chat about this,
> > talking this week face-to-face would have been better, but
> I need to
> > run to the train and plane immediately after the meeting.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mark Townsley [mailto:townsley at cisco.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 2:42 PM
> > > To: ancp at ietf.org; Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> > > Subject: ANCP MIB
> > >
> > >
> > > I spoke with Dan this morning. He tells me that there is
> no need to
> > > import the entire GSMP MIB if ANCP doesn't need it.
> > > There are ways to "pick and choose" what ANCP needs from
> > GSMP for the
> > > baseline to work.
> > > So, I'd like to ask Dan to continue to advise us here on
> > what the WG
> > > needs to do.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > - Mark
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ANCP mailing list
> > ANCP at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp
> >
>
_______________________________________________
ANCP mailing list
ANCP at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp