Re: [ANCP] White-List and Black-List definition

"Wojciech Dec (wdec)" <wdec@cisco.com> Thu, 03 April 2008 12:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ancp-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ancp-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ancp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED8D28C68D; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 05:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ancp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ancp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673D228C66B for <ancp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 05:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RH4i009bKoqr for <ancp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 05:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9864F28C6BC for <ancp@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 05:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,598,1199660400"; d="scan'208,217";a="5271910"
Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2008 14:03:20 +0200
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m33C3IVU008185; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:03:18 +0200
Received: from xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-331.cisco.com [144.254.231.71]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m33C3IID003939; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:03:18 GMT
Received: from xmb-ams-33b.cisco.com ([144.254.231.86]) by xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:03:18 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:03:15 +0200
Message-ID: <D9872168DBD43A41BD71FFC4713274D404DA5E90@xmb-ams-33b.emea.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <006701c89575$9f4d61a0$ac4c460a@china.huawei.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [ANCP] White-List and Black-List definition
thread-index: AciVds/2oKr8l6rRSU+COBTYMJTflgACgJpg
References: <1B6169C658325341A3B8066E23919E1C81F76F@S4DE8PSAANK.mitte.t-com.de><47B94869.8030905@alcatel-lucent.be><1B6169C658325341A3B8066E23919E1C81F782@S4DE8PSAANK.mitte.t-com.de><47BAE191.5040406@alcatel-lucent.be><1B6169C658325341A3B8066E23919E1C81F785@S4DE8PSAANK.mitte.t-com.de><47BC2A44.4050104@alcatel-lucent.be><83153A1EB675AF4F82E134FA27F95F6702F9C8D0@ilptex01.ecitele.com><1B6169C658325341A3B8066E23919E1C81F78C@S4DE8PSAANK.mitte.t-com.de><83153A1EB675AF4F82E134FA27F95F6702F9CA89@ilptex01.ecitele.com><47BD83E7.4040009@alcatel-lucent.be><83153A1EB675AF4F82E134FA27F95F6702FE934A@ilptex01.ecitele.com><1B6169C658325341A3B8066E23919E1C81F869@S4DE8PSAANK.mitte.t-com.de><7A6D4815C5E8F74988784FEBD50F2F1E017D7C29@FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com><1B6169C658325341A3B8066E23919E1C81F86B@S4DE8PSAANK.mitte.t-com.de><1B6169C658325341A3B8066E23919E1C81F897@S4DE8PSAANK.mitte.t-com.de><7A6D4815C5E8F74988784FEBD50F2F1E01866986@FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com> <006701c89575$9f4d61a0$ac4c46 0a@china .huawei.com>
From: "Wojciech Dec (wdec)" <wdec@cisco.com>
To: Tina TSOU <tena@huawei.com>, ancp@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Apr 2008 12:03:18.0456 (UTC) FILETIME=[B4605B80:01C89582]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=3290; t=1207224198; x=1208088198; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=wdec@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Wojciech=20Dec=20(wdec)=22=20<wdec@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[ANCP]=20White-List=20and=20Black-List= 20definition |Sender:=20; bh=mgs2zk3GrpC4XddO6ooa0bA8Vr7xf3GxPhk+IuJkIGI=; b=YqohwWeG/R4RPycKR9+c4MXCu/HXlcdyLhearZqF1PnuUJxeZOxP/bP+65 IlKOXyh0SX/6vB49WCIGouWM+H1GNsWEHl81XHmTNZ6kR//A4K3GiKq2YUt/ 7oWNSLgfR7;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=wdec@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
Subject: Re: [ANCP] White-List and Black-List definition
X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list <ancp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ancp>
List-Post: <mailto:ancp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0613156866=="
Sender: ancp-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ancp-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Tina,
 
Are you asking for an additional description to what the framework draft
(draft-ietf-ancp-framework) already describes in terms of
white/black/grey list? If so, could you share in what areas would you
see as needing more formal definition?
 
Regards,
Woj.


________________________________

	From: ancp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ancp-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Tina TSOU
	Sent: 03 April 2008 12:30
	To: ancp@ietf.org
	Subject: Re: [ANCP] White-List and Black-List definition
	
	
	Hi all,
	Besides White-List and Black-List usage description, do we need
formal definitions for them respectively in some ANCP WG draft?
	 
	B. R.
	Tina
	 

_______________________________________________
ANCP mailing list
ANCP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp