Re: port registration (was: Re: [VCARDDAV] Lars DISCUSS on draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: port registration (was: Re: [VCARDDAV] Lars DISCUSS on draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav)

To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>
Subject: Re: port registration (was: Re: [VCARDDAV] Lars DISCUSS on draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav)
From: SM <sm at resistor.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:26:57 -0700
Cc: apps-discuss at ietf.org
Delivered-to: apps-discuss at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1256250473; x=1256336873; bh=ws104g0S1TlsRr6yrlOBwTsJwQ6okPPkgLiet51NB/8=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=RG+OZmuSlsmUmRqAgpUfqXWgZZU+BBOyxgN1cgtaUqqQTWegw1ZOhoVpdIeu7gRcZ lMRDrEdJaFF/RFdwssyBfdgp8rIXC5yC2qEWHr9ZLsTNx0m5UtIt8NNatGP0zAQsxw iO70F5h8HB/grdIPxVTfleTNZ071v/K7ta56YZyM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=TrhEW5sKMMoYvV7JEtcXnGnRv4/jVlB+iNiP8LnZyid9vlqVVF8pvPF44gps89umq UbyZaQECIlbi5iXHOhKQJtfF87vQzMfY3NVscs3Y8m/fu3mKR2HZ7p2XIem/gkwiz6n dKelfssyDWXJbF9K4LsJui67xMAQKTHtVqivUAI=
In-reply-to: <4AE0BED2.8060309 at stpeter.im>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4AE0BED2.8060309 at stpeter.im>

Hi Peter,
At 13:21 22-10-2009, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
The revised procedures in draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports might have an
interesting impact on AppsArea technologies, since we have registered a
fair number of ports, DNS SRV records, etc. Has anyone here thought much
about the potential impact?

draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports anddraft-gudmundsson-dns-srv-iana-registry are set on a collision course.


Regards,

-sm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: port registration (was: Re: [VCARDDAV] Lars DISCUSS on draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav)
  - From: Lars Eggert

References:
- port registration (was: Re: [VCARDDAV] Lars DISCUSS on draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav)
  - From: Peter Saint-Andre

Prev by Date: Re: port registration (was: Re: [VCARDDAV] Lars DISCUSS on draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav)
Next by Date: Re: port registration
Previous by thread: Re: port registration
Next by thread: Re: port registration (was: Re: [VCARDDAV] Lars DISCUSS on draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: port registration (was: Re: [VCARDDAV] Lars DISCUSS on draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.