[apps-discuss] Apps-team review of draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-02
"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Thu, 09 September 2010 21:44 UTC
Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780CC3A680F; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rK4xzNNg6OBd; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3E53A681A; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (h135-3-40-63.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id o89LiAgT023509 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:44:11 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (Knoppix-135185238233.ih.lucent.com [135.185.238.233]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id o89LiAFD009212; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:44:10 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4C89558D.4000401@bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:45:49 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.0.6-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-geopriv-arch@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39
Cc: rbarnes@bbn.com, acooper@cdt.org, IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: [apps-discuss] Apps-team review of draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-02
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:44:30 -0000
I have been selected as the Applications Area Review Team reviewer for this draft (for background on apps-review, please see http://www.apps.ietf.org/content/applications-area-review-team). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-02 Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: Sept-9-2010 IETF Last Call Date: Unknown IESG Telechat Date: Sept-9-2010 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a BCP. Major issues: None. Minor issues: 2 Nits: 2 I realize that this review is a day late, my apologies. However, none of the review comments below are blocking so attending to them should be low impact. The document is very well written. Minor issues: ------------- 1) In S2.2 you state that a LO can contain geodetic or civic location data. Common sense argues that they should be the same in the sense that they point to the same physical location. However, is there a requirement to that effect in the document (if there is, please disregard. But I do not recall reading such a requirement)? What if they are different? 2) In Figure 3, there is a vertical line from LG to Device. What information is sent on that interface? It is clear that the vertical line from the Device to LG is sending some manner of positioning data that the device wants to transmit. But I am not sure what information the vertical line from LG to Device carries. There is some text later on --- on the top of page 15 --- that says "The LG provides assistance data to the Device". If so, then a label containing this information should be placed in Figure 3. Nits: ------ 1) S2.2, "Device" definition: Do you mean "The physical device ..." when you wrote "The technical device ..."? 2) S3.2.2, opening sentence. "Some performing ..." What is the object there? Some what? Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA) Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org} Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
- [apps-discuss] Apps-team review of draft-ietf-geo… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [apps-discuss] Apps-team review of draft-ietf… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [apps-discuss] Apps-team review of draft-ietf… Alissa Cooper