[apps-discuss] apps-team review of draft-ietf-mif-current-practices-11

Xiaodong Lee <lee@cnnic.cn> Wed, 27 April 2011 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <lee@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E8EE0717 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 06:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <XaQfvVf0petz>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "Message-ID"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XaQfvVf0petz for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 06:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp.cnnic.cn [159.226.7.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D3682E074B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 06:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (eyou send program); Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:54:33 +0800
Message-ID: <503912473.01951@cnnic.cn>
X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: lee@cnnic.cn
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.16.40]) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:54:33 +0800
Message-ID: <4DB82017.1010303@cnnic.cn>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:54:31 +0800
From: Xiaodong Lee <lee@cnnic.cn>
Organization: CNNIC
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mif-current-practices@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, denghui02@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [apps-discuss] apps-team review of draft-ietf-mif-current-practices-11
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lee@cnnic.cn
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:54:42 -0000

I have been selected as the Applications Area Review Team reviewer for 
this draft (for background on apps-review, please see 
http://www.apps.ietf.org/content/applications-area-review-team).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd 
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-mif-current-practices-11
Title: Current Practices for Multiple Interface Hosts
Reviewer: Xiaodong Lee

Review Date: April 26, 2011

Review Summary:
This draft is almost ready for publication as an Informational RFC but 
has a few issues that suggested to be fixed before publication.

Major Issues:
This draft gives the introduction about the multiple-interface solutions 
implemented in some widely used operating systems. It seems that this 
draft just simply introduces or lists every example. The author might 
consider the following suggestions:
     - Do some simple analysis of pros and cons of every implementation 
or solution;
     - Compare different solutions and make some possible suggestions. 
Since this draft aims for an informational RFC, doing some analysis and 
comparison will be helpful for the readers.

Minor issues:
- Both the "multiple-interface" and the "multi-interface" are used in 
this document with the same meaning.
- Term "PEERDNS" might have reference.


Nits:
- In Section 3.2.2.3, second paragraph, third sentence:
                 "become" should be "becomes" here.

Regards,

-- 
--
Xiaodong Lee,
VP&CTO, CNNIC
Professor, Chinese Academy of Sciences