[apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-08
"Jiankang YAO" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> Tue, 13 March 2012 08:22 UTC
Return-Path: <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7884C21F8882 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.361
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.361 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.485, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ah8WQHKaWN+8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp.cnnic.cn [159.226.7.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C8AA21F885A for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: yaojk@cnnic.cn
Received: from unknown127.0.0.1 (HELO lenovo47e041cf) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:22:32 +0800
Message-ID: <B1B1C35407FC46B5B0903C245817E7FB@LENOVO47E041CF>
From: Jiankang YAO <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, scottr.nist@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:22:33 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-08
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:22:43 -0000
I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer for this draft (for background on appsdir, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate ). Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-08 Title: Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry Reviewer: Jiankang Yao Review Date: March 13, 2012 Summary: This draft is useful. If it is published, the following issues should be considered or addressed before publication. Minor issue: 1) The introduction said "This document updates the following: [RFC2536], [RFC2539], [RFC3110], [RFC4034], [RFC4398], [RFC5155], [RFC5702], and [RFC5933]. " It should address what is updated in these RFCs [RFC2536], [RFC2539], [RFC3110], [RFC4034], [RFC4398], [RFC5155], [RFC5702], and [RFC5933]. Nits: This sentence below in the IANA considerations section should be noted with "removed when rfc is published". "In the column "Compliance to RFC TBD", "RFC TBD" should bechanged to the official RFC when published. " Jiankang Yao
- [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsex… Jiankang YAO
- Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-d… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-d… Ralph Droms
- Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-d… Scott Rose