Re: [apps-discuss] On citations in general

Blaine Cook <romeda@gmail.com> Wed, 25 April 2012 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <romeda@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF2121F881C for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.082, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ReY+rN2sG5X for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D2621F873C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagj5 with SMTP id j5so329649lag.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=+0R+lhPjolu3jpCQiuRhK4opfOcNgQg2ZYlRyJMs808=; b=z+clQo2a2wzAXPisrAfD9YsFjm84oo3pO6nnJ8VPrqWMTYTPfUwwOf5K2En+38jnBn OvYwWQnu92ILskEBSb/meKZZMrMOdn8wII3oOrk+9J9Fuhew47Bs0jCnoFIZS3rJSAvJ 2KFrRqLqR3fcqYMA7eRfcY+kkezHnt0ocmn12oDMJ7tMRg3rrWQ/tP+9Ni5BFEPr7lfA 6sHU9kLO78EoOTr5jCOeZxP8uYC5M4k9XcJisHDqzw6iHMoVZCL0urjC24LlU7dgiq4/ NhL7SQ6j8+S6Zt4ErDZz3oDNgsWvy7tw7AXH4qstFV7ELZNTNOoQZ2k8LnqKqGwrmucy 3c5A==
Received: by 10.152.105.241 with SMTP id gp17mr3920051lab.21.1335377388244; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.24.229 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+V1aj+POiOSYMOUj+2yvKFF-iOVGy3xuwa+Q-a57Mk9Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC4RtVBu=dQtc5A-h7sFa0nkowwqd61YfKs1AX2Xzhr2Fr0Btw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6itNr30mLf=sng9_8fOaE+Wk_acK5a+2fsg2KhGAXiAfjQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+V1aj+POiOSYMOUj+2yvKFF-iOVGy3xuwa+Q-a57Mk9Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Blaine Cook <romeda@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:09:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAz=scmM0QAtD_RPzNMCc=fUz=iVNGJPwe2dHXeN9fgd6OwhGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0407152bde0ff004be84c68f"
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] On citations in general
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:09:50 -0000

Why not just use links as Tim suggests with descriptive text in the content
of the anchor? I don't see how offline reading is a blocker.

b.

On 25 April 2012 16:35, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

> > If only there were a technology which allowed citations to be made
> > actual actionable usable links directly to the targeted source.
>
> Yeh, eliminating your biting sarcasm: we're often reviewing these
> things offline, and sometimes even from printed text.  Not having to
> flip back and forth can be useful.
>
> Barry
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>