[apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-tunneling-02

Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info> Fri, 22 June 2012 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jyee@afilias.info>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD44F21F860E for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.643
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.643 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gRjThKZNChEt for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.afilias.info (outbound.afilias.info [69.46.124.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EB521F860D for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ms6.yyz2.afilias-ops.info ([10.50.129.112] helo=smtp.afilias.info) by outbound.afilias.info with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1SiBii-000297-3v for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:48:48 +0000
Received: from mail-vb0-f50.google.com ([209.85.212.50]) by smtp.afilias.info with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1SiBii-0008Tr-6b for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:48:48 +0000
Received: by vbal1 with SMTP id l1so1204711vba.9 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=BiHo9ehi9MTQBrmrL+vKYxSlCUc6A7qnzj5jfpZUghU=; b=DALao2rl5hp3Q97DcOm8bVqprd75lTkApicLMhZNzR/vZkqJspTIrLggv0kg8c1+eE Q0ryiBJCpAFcqLI1CJ3e0gkQiBcTDlDEIHe0lqzVtijGUiVggJnhOhJDcDH4V/ZXOBvF tvRcyy53Dr4+URWwo1L/OAnPrxqqSKkmCWlUEHmPWMiyDNYe42ilgoJLt1VtgbwWGe00 vwmjlbhH/eWHbWM/IlWK253rzY5HLMvsdDo/kPzHXTYqHaK2SzkfBZHODZ9aoZsGOosv TJCghnUTu4izvKaNYBq5Rn869BSBrqI0k9skr9ws/Th55e//cUUv6J2+QXUJek26Y1Sh j8zA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.95.110 with SMTP id dj14mr1518550vdb.69.1340401727408; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.158.34 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:48:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF1dMVGhOaox+k7AFt+UOJOBWAsJfWAhYH7UOZTeiyVyuwzuvw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-tunneling.all@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlZFXKSCXMAJaidKFrEUQWktI1s3hZ811HPgXkmTlSDNAJNx4mFLyNdVHuDGo59Pp9M1Xoy
Subject: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-tunneling-02
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 21:48:49 -0000

I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer for
this draft (for background on appsdir, please see
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate
).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-tunneling-02
Title: Tunneling of Message Transfer Priorities
Reviewer: Joseph Yee
Review Date: 2012-06-22

Summary:

    This draft is ready for publication as an Experimental RFC.

Major Issues:

    none

Minor Issues:

    none

Nits:

    (1)
        At section 1 Introduction, the text in third paragraph talks
about unextended MUA in scenario 2, but in the detailed description at
5th paragraph, it says "The client is extended via a plugin.....".
Although the text meant many MUA plugin do not cover SMTP protocol
features, the word "extended" in detailed description has some
confusion.  Suggest to change it to "The client is extendable via
...."

    (2)
        Section 1 Introduction, 3rd paragraph, typo
        s/scenarious/scenarios/

    (3)
        Several references (Normative References) were not used.
Although some textes "touched" keywords like 'MSA', it did not cite
specific rules or concepts.  So either add the reference back in text
or remove the references work, IMHO.
        - [RFC2034]
        - [RFC5321]
        - [RFC5248]
        - [RFC6409]


Regards,
Joseph