Re: [apps-discuss] Looking at Webfinger

First, I did not talk about SRV records, but URI records.

Secondly, I think it is fascinating that people that love new things like "the web" and new HTML5 features are the most conservative ones regarding other protocols like DNS.

With that attitude, we have no evolution, and no innovation.

Providers that do not support such features will die. It is that simple.

   Patrik

On 30 aug 2012, at 08:03, William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

> There are a few folks that feel that SRV records are not really an option for hosting situatiosn where the users don't currently have the ability to configure SRV records.
> 
> From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
> To: Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com> 
> Cc: 'Mark Nottingham' <mnot@mnot.net>; 'IETF Apps Discuss' <apps-discuss@ietf.org> 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 8:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Looking at Webfinger
> 
> On 29 aug 2012, at 22:44, Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com> wrote:
> 
> > 1) TXT records (e.g., _webfinger.packetizer.com IN TXT “https://packetizer.webfinger-provider.com/”)
> 
> Please see URI Resource Record, for example:
> 
> _webfinger._tcp.packetizer.com. IN URI 0 0 “https://packetizer.webfinger-provider.com/”
> 
>   Patrik
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
> 
> 