[apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-bonica-special-purpose-04
Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info> Fri, 21 December 2012 05:12 UTC
Return-Path: <jyee@afilias.info>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1897021F8953 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:12:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bnlFHKdAWbOG for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:12:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outbound.afilias.info (outbound.afilias.info [66.199.183.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B8B21F88E1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:12:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ms5.on1.afilias-ops.info ([10.109.8.9] helo=smtp.afilias.info) by outbound.afilias.info with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1TluuP-0004aE-5u for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:12:33 +0000
Received: from mail-ia0-f200.google.com ([209.85.210.200]) by smtp.afilias.info with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1TluuP-0007yo-5f for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:12:33 +0000
Received: by mail-ia0-f200.google.com with SMTP id f6so11675117iag.3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:12:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=b4c4R7PHjZxx08naLZboBKO3UiBBNfjWIKY+v5cq8Jc=; b=VrF1Xp22diht2bhfIH58BCuHPFN+KKqx1JCDB3XBARybNyFb8cqqD4JhNbfUavN55L F1xulmxxMwcp9V6ntnOh41oorXPbbuNSBpo1z2b4JKfhBjm9ImxFjwV7hsnpJHskesZT GKimsv9+fklJ8Ku1AVwNXxbbaOXx5vmmBq2bQOb5Vl8Wui+CaRX8jIoLmoAM+Uu4BM++ dN2JIXmmZqQmg1HzxbT9thd09ipTyJZSee/Qk2T9UyYO4MazTthVHSyHerG9blKkRMsT OUkntI8DbW4YncpdtFSEgHynutgR3kbjZEdkIAsRf/rqq1AonxuxJLl7OTc7j9OK+JY2 60+A==
X-Received: by 10.182.250.17 with SMTP id yy17mr9985306obc.33.1356066748285; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:12:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.250.17 with SMTP id yy17mr9985301obc.33.1356066748174; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:12:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.93.106 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:12:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:12:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF1dMVEk+Ky6w7YZ_PxJXjWaAd-d=sD+kkeNxmYG9A1OQcJgWQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-bonica-special-purpose.all@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlYw8KhWEb9dKl7XwYffKG05dxPWgSlQreSi0CtBo2ji/+FDpCqHFeeIVR77hPASkcU03Ol08Zcky9TRQ/t/WsFPfhPXP8VQl1ZmDES0y91l5T7aaVk/dLzMj1UFHK/r0kTOmDpajUFAM1w2MgjSIkaqwDFLA==
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-bonica-special-purpose-04
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:12:36 -0000
I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer for this draft (for background on appsdir, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate ). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-bonica-special-purpose-04 Title: Special-Purpose Address Registries Reviewer: Joseph Yee Review Date: Dec 20th 2012 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as Best Current Practice RFC. Major Issues: none. Minor Issues: (1) Table 20 - Reserved status for Discard-Only Prefix This seems like redirecting specific packets to some equivalent of /dev/null rather than drop, a very special behaviour IMHO. Shouldn't the reserved status more like True than False? (2) Update or Obsoletes RFC4773 & RFC5736? If the old output were obsoleted by this draft, isn't it better to obsolete old the rules as well. This is more of asking than raising it as issue. Nits: (1) No text references RFC4007. (2) In Table 1, the date format in Allocation Date (September, 1981) is different than the rest of the draft (no comma between month and year). If there is another level below nits, I will put this one under there. Note: I was reviewing version 03 and spotted 04 before publishing my review. I read the diff between the two and made adjustment of my review. Best Regards, Joseph