[apps-discuss] Applications Directorate review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 11 January 2013 18:25 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECB321F884A; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:25:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.059
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.059 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.540, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5olNvMbm8mt0; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:25:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ia0-f175.google.com (mail-ia0-f175.google.com [209.85.210.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C7921F8749; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:25:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 21so1773734iay.20 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:25:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+3sTxCMvlWHlEpjmeW/fOt/AtA2jav8N1AJeHlbiNcc=; b=zYiaZplFNTm4fZC+NzAHsblyafoVH2FmeMZKduhrvj8+VFbHnZglqVZ7swkw+FQlfz Mkg9TdM/Abold89GX2kFF9PuyYvxj3jh1jsNq/jBONMyPiMzSW0iGLFNsD02FojKNI0e xJIpGZ7ASucJxC3LaLGSuZiLEuS6aslyD54NfdiQX5vYl9Efr26e+czK06WdR9uOJMsy LRle1LSi6DanAohp2A71gG9vDVMNPy4P9VWKvmZwFR7buKyb/HSVL+4hspbRWPmnQ4Vx lMNuNI9e7wrBrpiOnXLntmYAyQ3CWi0aE+wSDGjyg3E6CT2e84hwsCco2AiSoG12K1v5 ij6w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.48.147 with SMTP id s19mr57286984icf.18.1357928708259; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:25:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.94.5 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:25:08 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:25:08 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBZaRyk0iDCczy2Mc8U3k1WdZWmPb0SMJdTxCPDZY709g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments.all@tools.ietf.org, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [apps-discuss] Applications Directorate review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:25:11 -0000
Document:draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-atomic-fragments-03
Title: Processing of IPv6 "atomic" fragments
Reviewer: Ted Hardie
Review Date: January 11, 2012
IETF Last Call Date:January 2, 2012
Summary: This document sets out the problem and solution clearly and
succinctly, and I believe it
is ready for publication as a Standards Track RFC.
Major Issues: None seen.
Minor Issues: None seen.
Nits: Other than those raised by Ray Hunter, I would suggest dropping
Appendix A on publication.
The list of operating systems tested is not comprehensive,
and the information will (hopefully)
quickly become stale. This is, however, largely a stylistic
choice, hence its classification as
a nit. .