[apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Thu, 17 January 2013 19:27 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EEA21F84DD; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:27:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.385
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.385 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.214, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V9a1mB-bFJJv; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:27:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from statler.isode.com (statler.isode.com [62.3.217.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7333421F84DA; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:27:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1358450870; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=Ykn0Do/xMPfDduTzeY3BriTkUCp+duXg6uxRYoT9gwA=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=JevNYyGh8lv+bpAl5OdY2TiT+RCyLHdflomrGudDfq1QTAONRz1Uy0ABfttM0CEl87FVIi j901hVqA3N6bFcyTvYRJW86z4/kDcxGdnZ//2XPTEYg1c7T/Mj/iplhgI8okA3KkLJ8dFg Y8+Z9S3Scg/exqcFKcMg9gySeVjo7QA=;
Received: from [172.16.1.29] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <UPhQtgAYIVLm@statler.isode.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:27:50 +0000
Message-ID: <50F850BC.8010203@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:27:56 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap.all@tools.ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:27:59 -0000
I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer for this draft (for background on appsdir, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06 Title: PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol For EAP Tunnel Methods Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2013-01-17 IETF Last Call Date: 2013-01-16 IESG Telechat Date: unknown Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC, with some minor issues with references. Major Issues: none Minor Issues: TEAP reference is normative, as it is mandatory-to-implement. (last sentence in 4.3). Also, is last sentence of 4.3 is contradicting the 2nd paragraph in Section 5? Similarly, tls-unique reference looks normative as well. Nits: none
- [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-nea-p… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-n… Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
- Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-n… Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)