[apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 21 January 2013 18:40 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DBF21F8B8A; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:40:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xSApjDUtHPgz; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:40:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from statler.isode.com (statler.isode.com [62.3.217.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E4721F8992; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:40:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1358793642; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=NwTvC10DAHMviOS2dDsNfG3KjgtF53s2kTN/zHX0HPE=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=cKz20NBCozOdPDvTRMfOx0KLbi8gw2+nf71NsHjnR8U5DZFtwswryXBe9KyhXBlWis9FAa 2sQ8id/QXrZidx95VcFKG/NqZLtGU3VsI6cm1dj0e8rRuAIot9oIpUmTfbZfCnQdcfiM5K DYUaZF5RtVvPEWD59BxYOUsT+PPR0fM=;
Received: from [172.16.1.29] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <UP2LqAAYISZY@statler.isode.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:40:41 +0000
Message-ID: <50FD8BB8.9060200@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:40:56 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-laurie-pki-sunlight.all@tools.ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:40:44 -0000
I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer for this draft (for background on appsdir, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05 Title: Certificate Transparency Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2013-01-21 IETF Last Call Date: 2013-01-24 IESG Telechat Date: unknown Summary: This draft is nearly ready for publication as an Experimental RFC. I think a revision should be able to address my issues (and issues raised by Eliot earlier). Major Issues: none Minor Issues: 1) There are no references for SHA-256/TLS/RSA in the document. They are Normative and should be added. 2) Section 4 needs references for JSON, base64 and HTTP. 3) Section 4.1: it would be good to have an example. 4) In 4.5/4.6: are indexes 0-based or 1-based?
- [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-laurie-pki… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-laurie… Ben Laurie