[apps-discuss] APPSDIR Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-security-framework-08
Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp> Fri, 08 February 2013 06:58 UTC
Return-Path: <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48EE21F8814; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 22:58:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HctdFz5ou3hg; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 22:58:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from off-send01.tyo.jprs.co.jp (off-send01.tyo.jprs.co.jp [IPv6:2001:df0:8:17::10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B83521F880F; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 22:58:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from off-sendsmg01.tyo.jprs.co.jp (off-sendsmg01.tyo.jprs.co.jp [172.18.8.32]) by off-send01.tyo.jprs.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r186wqGm017179; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 15:58:52 +0900
X-AuditID: ac120820-b7fec6d000005acc-6f-5114a22ce759
Received: from NOTE550 (off-cpu04.tyo.jprs.co.jp [172.18.4.14]) by off-sendsmg01.tyo.jprs.co.jp (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 48.29.23244.B22A4115; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 15:58:52 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 15:58:51 +0900
From: Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-tp-security-framework.all@tools.ietf.org
Message-Id: <20130208155851.85ff829da0b5e2348cc39037@jprs.co.jp>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrHIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWyRoiFT1dnkUigweY2JovVL1ewWdx738Fk MePPRGYHZo8lS34yeXy5/JktgCmKyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK2PF6eusBac4Kma/W8/SwPiVrYuR g0NCwETi26mcLkZOIFNM4sK99UBhLg4hgeOMErc3/WEESbAIqEgsPjQFzGYTMJD4tew3E4gt IhAq8fxXM5jNLCAo0fT+FQuILSzgLHF4zR9WEJtXwEFi16HVLBALLCQuNHWwg+zlBar/u0MY xGQWUJdYP08IYoq8RPPW2cwTGHlnIRTNQiiahaRoASPzKkaZ/LQ03eLUvJTi3HQDQ72Syny9 rIKiYr1kEL2JERxcHAo7GGecMjjEKMDBqMTD23NNOFCINbGsuDL3EKMkB5OSKK/2PJFAIb6k /JTKjMTijPii0pzU4kOMEhzMSiK8ojOBcrwpiZVVqUX5MClpDhYlcd7jZ3f4CQmkJ5akZqem FqQWwWRlODiUJHiPLwBqFCxKTU+tSMvMKUFIM3FwggznARrOuRBkeHFBYm5xZjpE/hSjpJQ4 70uQZgGQREZpHlzvK0ZxoBeEeb+CZHmAiQKu6xXQQCaggeszhUEGliQipKQaGLOzDe+q/jX7 puC6uinl/kdm/+Cgfc1Fi9nM9y1cKmOQ2VOl463/vVrAXeGTj+R/L8XHsV/s2Jf0zda95zNX U/u78JotOvsV25k9DE64f5u89N8xyXMhGUk7pXVuNerZb9STY9kqbLz8iNbKq0JHctn5NRPq JvQw/Obd4LSYofK6w9LpPtwKSizFGYmGWsxFxYkAPKFoZdECAAA=
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-security-framework-08
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:58:54 -0000
I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer for this draft (for background on appsdir, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate ). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-security-framework-08 Title: MPLS-TP Security Framework Reviewer: Yoshiro Yoneya Review Date: 2013-02-08 IETF Last Call Date: 2013-02-06 IESG Telechat Date: 2013-02-21 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Major Issues: none Minor Issues: - If target reader of this document described in Abstract and Introduction section, it would be better and much clear. Such as: "This document is intended to be a guideline especially for MPLS-TP protocol designers, service providers and equipment vendors.". Nits: none Regards, -- Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>
- [apps-discuss] APPSDIR Review of draft-ietf-mpls-… Yoshiro YONEYA