[apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-dot-x-17
Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info> Mon, 27 May 2013 16:29 UTC
Return-Path: <jyee@afilias.info>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB42D21F9660 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XWoDhM5pUYv0 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.afilias.info (outbound.afilias.info [66.199.183.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3300D21F969A for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ms5.on1.afilias-ops.info ([10.109.8.9] helo=smtp.afilias.info) by outbound.afilias.info with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1Uh0Ix-0004pT-3k for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Mon, 27 May 2013 16:29:51 +0000
Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com ([74.125.82.179]) by smtp.afilias.info with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1Uh0Ix-0002lJ-3J for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Mon, 27 May 2013 16:29:51 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id m46so4492999wev.38 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=/nPIfS6ZoaZCcr+OLOB//5albb9VC1lX3iE8MI5JHvo=; b=EshJynehSsbZBMlaWa6dk++0h1sPK4EqMkWuK8vSu1qJSei6FeH+yDtK5FcfqWjYcv PObRf7mbA2S34oy9Ztpu4pIiKanH1tIMh3Orz0XPZmtYLSTVdu7yyJsjksXZKVCGk5Nm TdJ0m4tUifYokftJi4Ju9hV9Axj17csOKdyPdEe5laTy4AY1/NstG+svIFLn27B43faF xh1lsusWCXWUcEdc11Q4xJQz3LryXyTFgXWE8k6xPqBicpoUQJRSgH+xIillnG6l3Lso QnBx4sVYZvdlFVc5gNjDVThHXHQq42UuVsafIu3uB1sIwxjUeP5DuSN9iPjYJHq4kPJ/ 4NOg==
X-Received: by 10.194.175.132 with SMTP id ca4mr9487474wjc.11.1369672184918; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.175.132 with SMTP id ca4mr9487469wjc.11.1369672184840; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.217.95.69 with HTTP; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 12:29:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF1dMVGF9hKcVjydA7XbM_gq9TF9T-AbmJdXtZwUCSC=V9dnSg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-dot-x.all@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013d1d8e09562204ddb5a80a"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnwK8Z8FCHYbwzozAbJuSdqn1E5lIygevXuZoUAkFlPpqPEJStG2DnDwtnh7UVBCmHLCgvVBbXp5wR8+L8aFd1Co8VMov0AvjnnS1k9h3g78CjaUC1sczXBsr5wRfB2M5T58CrOt+OXouBqcob18k+rW+tuWg==
Subject: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-dot-x-17
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 16:29:56 -0000
I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer for this draft (for background on appsdir, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-dot-x-17 Title: [document title] Reviewer: Joseph Yee Review Date: May 26, 2013 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as Proposed Standard. Major Issues: none Minor Issues: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-26 already stated that this draft (draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-dot-x-17) is the authoritative one if conflict happened. So re-stating it again in this draft is nice to have, but not necessary. Note: I checked this draft against draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-26 and I didn't find any conflict. Nits: I didn't run it against id-nit tool Best, Joseph