[apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uris-05

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sun, 04 August 2013 23:30 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9783B21F9B5C; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 16:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f-PaoarQ0iZp; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 16:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FF911E80FF; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 16:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.130.143]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r74NU3Do007707 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 4 Aug 2013 16:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1375659016; bh=j+QnkPandXnA4FQa0AMzGkuj8iwl9ABWi7aMScyDyoo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=kR0mzylkOY9CjXHyLJCj+i1m7HFFqliKo4d9oWcfEVyY0Ib+xUiVpxkL02duvxUC+ OC2giRzX2NAPfqmRNkuH0zBNQjkkXYF8DS5UHnE3/+IALo4UPgvFYDH8GIy3vLgYzu kcTUOFbGSVStiW1RoMZc+8CDn9gy5UhmbuwchuBI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1375659016; i=@elandsys.com; bh=j+QnkPandXnA4FQa0AMzGkuj8iwl9ABWi7aMScyDyoo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=bSUHCYWUdCkEKrg4bWF4r9yyhoRy991o79tCEQuedetXEKXJijQWJn1JshoM5kJPQ JVKVW4M2ojQbPFdK5T1QWUT2D/FswOxBPZM7LwbLBAE0r6WiGXNP1YYoINd+pM1nZI eSUlzNeLDs6tlgG6y86+E7XWRkzgQhk+I77ABfTc=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130804152246.0c672f50@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:25:46 -0700
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uris.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uris-05
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 23:30:22 -0000

I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer 
for this draft (for background on APPSDIR, please see 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate ).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document 
shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uris-05
Title: Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers
Reviewer: S. Moonesamy
Review Date: August 4, 2013
IETF Last Call Date: July 19, 2013

Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.

This document defines two URI schemes to provision the TURN 
Resolution Mechanism.

Major issues: None

Minor issues:

The Terminology Section is different from the usual RFC 2119 
boilerplate.  I am listing this as a minor issue for the attention of 
the Apps ADs.

This document restates the ABNF from RFC 3986.  I suggest including 
it by reference.  Please note that I read Appendix B.

Nits:

This review does not include editorial nits.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy