[apps-discuss] RESTful definition

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 15 September 2014 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0DA1A6F41 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x_fPebl6oGe2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x231.google.com (mail-la0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 395331A802A for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id pv20so5377446lab.8 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=flGnA69D1RifPQguYALJuNQ8ZJR2q7CpZviGCZE9Jdc=; b=tJGUNkQk7KTNWMVmkjRcnqDT34tOEs0QsjNz7tBzffpHZUvaCf7dRb5QpI+Owv1zdu gsOfo0pvkKsyTI3EDOKuO2e8H2HL5JhLzVhv04NYZ4CDyip433hJivQwazmUEO2O2ZOO iRm3UYohp/fUQzqaDs+GOD7zBwOAMsO9yzlWPDqxPsCHxGshVQRVxabKwPhznueYUKcC 6WzN8/jTjIKxckmUWf4sGMe7SHUerSK3Ts9pHbHL4Fp8Q67fnyk1XIWt20of3oQmkOGx w2wsFLhHlLlQmeVFFR5uLQ98/ljSAdKyPZdCPqOhE7ZCqy639UYa8XnurcJ6MKglpE1u GUZw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.63.71 with SMTP id e7mr5840084lbs.89.1410812128301; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.211.82 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:15:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYbn1-A+U17AW1XVMcvcoyxMqGoO+8w7e0pJS5=sqPwkQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3ee62c0a0720503204b63"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/Zu2hgelCs3KS1fN-4dxbjOXvXeI
Subject: [apps-discuss] RESTful definition
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:16:03 -0000

Is there a sufficiently stable definition for "REST" or "RESTful" we can
reference from a future RFC?  I can't think of anything authoritative, and
search engines point me to things that I don't imagine we'd consider to be
stable enough.  Wikipedia seems to be the closest thing; do we allow such
references in RFCs these days?

Thanks,
-MSK