Re: [APPS-REVIEW] review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15

[Eliot Lear <lear at cisco.com>]

Thanks, Julian, for your response.  Please see below:

> The media type of the payload of the patch request is completely 
> orthogonal to the media type of the thing being patched. Yes, that 
> means that we need to define one media type per patch format; but 
> that's by design in HTTP, methinks.

Ok, I understand.  And so you just re-register a new media-type for the 
different PATCH method (assuming the type  doesn't already exist).  Thus 
the new header.  Okay.  I withdraw my major concern.