Re: [APPS-REVIEW] [Fwd: Review of metalink I-D]

[Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/30/09 3:09 PM, SM wrote:
> At 13:21 30-10-2009, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Is there a straightforward way to discover the document shepherd? I
>> don't see that information listed in the datatracker, but I might be
>> missing something.
> 
> You can use https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/  I'll use Lisa's I-D
> as an example.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-dusseault-http-patch/
> mentions the responsible I-D and the Document Shepherd.

Aha, I had ended up at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/draft-dusseault-http-patch/ instead
of https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-dusseault-http-patch/

> An I-D may not have been assigned to an AD or have a Document Shepherd
> yet.  Should the team review such an I-D?  I'll say maybe if it helps
> the Apps Area ADs decide whether to sponsor the I-D.  But you may be
> reviewing the document too early then (see Alexey's message about the
> intent).

In general we will be reviewing documents in IETF Last Call, so they
will have at least an AD and perhaps a shepherd. We will complete early
reviews if requested, but I think that will be exceptional.

> The bottom line is whether to use the process to determine the
> acceptable level of quality for an I-D to be reviewed.

Yes.

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkrrWAcACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyvDACgyJTU91nHWmCd8OdwTSGSJjDt
jlYAoMYGx09MEPCweaX1lw8Y+ki4mqui
=xofp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----