Open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Main Archive Directory]

Dec 29 2011

Re: [arch-d] Re Follow-on questions from the "Internet of Things" discussion on Monday, Zach Shelby

Dec 26 2011

[arch-d] Re Follow-on questions from the "Internet of Things" discussion on Monday, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: [arch-d] Interconnecting Smart Objects with the Internet - Technical Plenary at IETF 82, Taipei, Hannes Tschofenig

Nov 24 2011

[arch-d] Follow-on questions from the "Internet of Things" discussion on Monday (fwd), Bernard Aboba

Nov 23 2011

[arch-d] IAB Document Status, Bernard Aboba
Re: [arch-d] UDP Client-Server Behavior, Randall Gellens
Re: [arch-d] UDP Client-Server Behavior, Joe Touch
Re: [arch-d] UDP Client-Server Behavior, deepak rajaram

Nov 22 2011

Re: [arch-d] UDP Client-Server Behavior, Joe Touch
Re: [arch-d] UDP Client-Server Behavior, Randall Gellens
Re: [arch-d] UDP Client-Server Behavior, deepak rajaram

Nov 21 2011

Re: [arch-d] UDP Client-Server Behavior, Joe Touch
[arch-d] UDP Client-Server Behavior, deepak rajaram

Mar 26 2009

Re: [arch-d] test, Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] test, Scott Brim
Re: [arch-d] test, Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] test, Scott Brim

Mar 26 2009

Re: [arch-d] test, Alexandru Petrescu
[arch-d] test, Scott Brim

Mar 04 2009

Re: [arch-d] version numbers, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress
Re: [arch-d] version numbers, Mark Baker

Feb 23 2009

Re: [arch-d] version numbers, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress
[arch-d] Please ignore this message, Ray Denenberg

Feb 08 2008

Re: [arch-d] The proper fole of version numbers, tom.petch

Feb 06 2008

Re: [arch-d] The proper fole of version numbers, John Day

Feb 06 2008

Re: [arch-d] The proper fole of version numbers, Tony Li
Re: [arch-d] The proper fole of version numbers, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [arch-d] The proper fole of version numbers, Mark Baker
Re: [arch-d] The proper fole of version numbers, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [arch-d] The proper fole of version numbers, touch
Re: [arch-d] The proper fole of version numbers, John Day
[arch-d] The proper fole of version numbers, Dave Crocker

Feb 01 2008

ietf.org mailing list memberships reminder, mailman-owner
ietf.org mailing list memberships reminder, mailman-owner

Jun 07 2007

[arch-d] Invitation to join new unofficial IETF mailing list: re-ECN, Bob Briscoe

May 09 2007

RE: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Alvaro Vives Martinez
RE: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Alvaro Vives Martinez
RE: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Alvaro Vives Martinez
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Christian Vogt

May 08 2007

Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Tony Li
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Christian Vogt

May 07 2007

[arch-d] Tunnel MTU link adaptation and the Reserved Fragmentation (RF) bit, Templin, Fred L

May 04 2007

[arch-d] IPvLX and companion documents updated, Templin, Fred L

May 01 2007

Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Brian E Carpenter

Apr 30 2007

Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Andrew McGregor
RE: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Templin, Fred L
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Dan McDonald
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Merike Kaeo
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Dan McDonald
RE: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RCN0)
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, JFC Morfin
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, John Day
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Brian E Carpenter

Apr 27 2007

Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Ted Hardie
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, John Leslie
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, John Day
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Fergie
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Brian E Carpenter

Apr 26 2007

Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, John Day
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Andrew McGregor

Apr 25 2007

[arch-d] NASA Exploration Program - Netcentric Operations - Request for Information, Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RCN0)
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, John Day
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, John Day
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Jari Arkko
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Tony Li
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Tony Li
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, John Leslie
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, John Leslie
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, John Leslie
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, John Day

Apr 24 2007

RE: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Henderson, Thomas R
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Dave Crocker
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Brian E Carpenter

Apr 23 2007

Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Peter Sherbin
Re: [arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, JFC Morfin

Apr 22 2007

[arch-d] Benefits of identity/location separation?, Noel Chiappa

Mar 21 2007

[arch-d] Fwd: Unofficial BoF on "re-ECN architectural intent", Bob Briscoe

Mar 16 2007

[arch-d] Bar BoF on "re-ECN architectural intent", Bob Briscoe

Mar 13 2007

Remove Limitation, support

Mar 05 2007

[arch-d] RRG meeting change of venue, Tony Li

Mar 02 2007

Re: [arch-d] Re: [RAM] IRTF RRG: call for participation, Marshall Eubanks
Re: [arch-d] Re: [RAM] IRTF RRG: call for participation, Joe Touch
Re: [arch-d] Re: [RAM] IRTF RRG: call for participation, Marshall Eubanks
Re: [arch-d] Re: [RAM] IRTF RRG: call for participation, Joe Touch
Re: [arch-d] Re: [RAM] IRTF RRG: call for participation, Chris Morrow
RE: [arch-d] Re: [RAM] IRTF RRG: call for participation, Bound, Jim

Feb 27 2007

Re: [arch-d] Re: [RAM] IRTF RRG: call for participation, Tony Li
Re: [arch-d] Re: [RAM] IRTF RRG: call for participation, Markus Stenberg

Feb 27 2007

[arch-d] Re: [RAM] IRTF RRG: call for participation, Lixia Zhang
[arch-d] IRTF RRG: call for participation, Tony Li
[arch-d] RE: [RAM] IRTF RRG: call for participation, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)

Feb 26 2007

Re: Ok, so what should we do then? (Was: Re: [arch-d] [Off-topic]Furtherthoughts: about systems theory and the theory U), JFC Morfin
Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Brian E Carpenter
[no subject], Unknown
[no subject], Unknown
Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Peter Tomsu

Feb 07 2007

Re: Ok, so what should we do then? (Was: Re: [arch-d] [Off-topic]Furtherthoughts: about systems theory and the theory U), Margaret Wasserman

Feb 06 2007

Re: Ok, so what should we do then? (Was: Re: [arch-d] [Off-topic]Furtherthoughts: about systems theory and the theory U), Brian E Carpenter
Re: Ok, so what should we do then? (Was: Re: [arch-d] [Off-topic]Furtherthoughts: about systems theory and the theory U), Margaret Wasserman

Feb 05 2007

Re: Ok, so what should we do then? (Was: Re: [arch-d] [Off-topic]Furtherthoughts: about systems theory and the theory U), Margaret Wasserman

Jan 31 2007

Re: [arch-d] Use of IPv6 Addressing for QoS, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [arch-d] Use of IPv6 Addressing for QoS, HeinerHummel
Re: [arch-d] Use of IPv6 Addressing for QoS, Chris Morrow

Jan 30 2007

[arch-d] Use of IPv6 Addressing for QoS, Ivancic, William D. \(GRC-RCN0\)

Jan 29 2007

Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Iljitsch van Beijnum

Jan 23 2007

Re: [arch-d] 1. the architecture, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Brian E Carpenter

Jan 22 2007

Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Jari Arkko
Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Simon Leinen
[arch-d] thinking about "congestion", John Leslie
Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Bruce Curtis
Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Spencer Dawkins
[arch-d] Next Generation Networks, Guillaume FORTAINE

Jan 21 2007

Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Andrew McGregor
Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Henning Schulzrinne
Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Wesley Eddy
Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Spencer Dawkins
Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Brian E Carpenter

Jan 20 2007

Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Bruce Curtis
Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, John Leslie
Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Bruce Curtis

Jan 18 2007

Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, John Leslie
Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Iljitsch van Beijnum

Jan 17 2007

Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, John Leslie
Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Bruce Curtis

Jan 13 2007

Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, John Leslie

Jan 12 2007

Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: [arch-d] 1. the architecture, Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: [arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, John Leslie
Re: [arch-d] 1. the architecture, John Leslie
[arch-d] 2. thinking about an implementation, Iljitsch van Beijnum
[arch-d] 1. the architecture, Iljitsch van Beijnum

Jan 10 2007

Re: [arch-d] common synthesis, Stephane Bortzmeyer

Jan 08 2007

[arch-d] common synthesis, JFCM

Jan 08 2007

Re: [arch-d] common synthesis, Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] common synthesis, tom.petch

Jan 07 2007

[arch-d] common synthesis, Michel Gauthier

Jan 04 2007

[arch-d] Security and Privacy, John Leslie
[arch-d] Mobility Responsibilities, John Leslie

Dec 27 2006

[arch-d] About the location of mobility, security, and privacy (was Re: Do we have "partial consensus"?), Pekka Nikander

Dec 27 2006

Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, John Leslie

Dec 19 2006

Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, John Leslie

Dec 18 2006

Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Lloyd Wood
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Marshall Eubanks
RE: [arch-d] On the role of "transport" (was Re: Do we have "partialconsensus"?), Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Peter Sherbin
Re: [arch-d] On the role of "transport" (was Re: Do we have "partialconsensus"?), Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] On the role of "transport" (was Re: Do we have "partialconsensus"?), Joe Touch
RE: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] On the role of "transport" (was Re: Do we have "partialconsensus"?), Bound, Jim

Dec 17 2006

RE: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, David Barak
Re: [arch-d] On the role of "transport" (was Re: Do we have "partialconsensus"?), Pekka Nikander
RE: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] On the role of "transport" (was Re: Do we have "partialconsensus"?), Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] On the role of "transport" (was Re: Do we have "partialconsensus"?), Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Bound, Jim

Dec 16 2006

Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Pekka Nikander

Dec 15 2006

Re: [arch-d] Re: [RAM] draft-iab-raws-report-00.txt posted to the ID repository, HeinerHummel
[arch-d] Re: [RAM] draft-iab-raws-report-00.txt posted to the ID repository, David Meyer
[arch-d] Re: [RAM] draft-iab-raws-report-00.txt posted to the ID repository, David Ward
[arch-d] Re: [RAM] draft-iab-raws-report-00.txt posted to the ID repository, David Meyer
[arch-d] Re: [RAM] draft-iab-raws-report-00.txt posted to the ID repository, David Ward
[arch-d] draft-iab-raws-report-00.txt posted to the ID repository, David Meyer
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Marshall Eubanks
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Brian E Carpenter

Dec 14 2006

Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, John Day
[arch-d] Should "mobility" be "trackable"?, John Leslie
Re: [arch-d] On the role of "transport" (was Re: Do we have "partial consensus"?), Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] On the role of "transport" (was Re: Do we have "partial consensus"?), Peter Sherbin
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Marshall Eubanks
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, tom.petch
[arch-d] On the role of "transport" (was Re: Do we have "partial consensus"?), Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Andrew McGregor
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Andrew McGregor

Dec 13 2006

Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Peter Sherbin
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, John Leslie
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Marshall Eubanks
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, HeinerHummel

Dec 12 2006

Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, John Leslie
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, John Leslie
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, David Barak
Re: [arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, HeinerHummel
[arch-d] Do we have "partial consensus"?, John Leslie

Dec 11 2006

RE: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, David Conrad
RE: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Bound, Jim

Dec 10 2006

Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, marcelo bagnulo braun
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Tony Li
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Tony Li

Dec 09 2006

RE: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Noel Chiappa
RE: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, HeinerHummel
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, marcelo bagnulo braun
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, David Conrad
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Tony Li
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Noel Chiappa
RE: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Marshall Eubanks
RE: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, HeinerHummel
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Tony Li

Dec 08 2006

Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, marcelo bagnulo braun
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, marcelo bagnulo braun
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Bruce Curtis
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Bruce Curtis
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, marcelo bagnulo braun
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Bruce Curtis
Re: [arch-d] Major practical decision, Mark Handley
[arch-d] Major practical decision, Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Spencer Dawkins
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Spencer Dawkins
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, marcelo bagnulo braun
RE: [RAM] Re: [arch-d] mailing lists and follow-ons to the IAB Routing &Addressing workshop, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] It's about Information, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] It's about Information, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] It's about Information, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] It's about Information, Bound, Jim

Dec 07 2006

Re: [RAM] Re: [arch-d] mailing lists and follow-ons to the IAB Routing & Addressing workshop, John Leslie
RE: [arch-d] It's about Information, Tony Li
Re: [arch-d] mailing lists and follow-ons to the IAB Routing & Addressing workshop, David Meyer
Re: [RAM] Re: [arch-d] mailing lists and follow-ons to the IAB Routing & Addr..., HeinerHummel
RE: [arch-d] It's about Information, John Day
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Bruce Curtis
Re: [arch-d] mailing lists and follow-ons to the IAB Routing & Addressing workshop, Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Wesley Eddy
RE: [arch-d] It's about Information, Tony Li
[arch-d] mailing lists and follow-ons to the IAB Routing & Addressing workshop, David Meyer
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Bruce Curtis
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Tony Li
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Bruce Curtis
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Bruce Curtis
RE: [arch-d] It's about Information, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigmis unsustainable, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigmis unsustainable, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packetparadigm is unsustainable, Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Fergie
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Bruce Curtis

Dec 05 2006

Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, John Day
Re: [arch-d] It's about Information, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Noel Chiappa

Dec 04 2006

[arch-d] It's about Information, Bruce Curtis
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Fred Baker
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Peter Sherbin
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Fred Baker
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, David Barak
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, John Day
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Peter Sherbin
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Peter Sherbin
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Peter Sherbin
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, John Day
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, william(at)elan.net
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Fred Baker
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Fred Baker
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Peter Sherbin
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsu..., HeinerHummel
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, John Day
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Peter Sherbin
[arch-d] A summary of Pekka's position so far, Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Peter Sherbin
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Andrew McGregor
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Peter Sherbin
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Peter Sherbin

Dec 03 2006

RE: [arch-d] transport layer identifier evolution to support multihoming, Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, John Leslie

Dec 02 2006

Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Pekka Nikander

Dec 01 2006

Re: [arch-d] Some notes about HIP and SHIM6 (was Re: On identifiers: w hat is virtual and what...), Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Peter Sherbin
RE: [arch-d] Some notes about HIP and SHIM6 (was Re: On identifiers:what is virtual and what...), Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Some notes about HIP and SHIM6 (was Re: On identifiers:what is virtual and what...), Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] Some notes about HIP and SHIM6 (was Re: On identifiers: what is virtual and what...), Noel Chiappa
RE: [arch-d] transport layer identifier evolutiion to support multihoming, John Day
RE: [arch-d] transport layer identifier evolutiion to support multihoming, Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Jefsey_Morfin
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Scott W Brim
Re: [arch-d] Some notes about HIP and SHIM6 (was Re: On identifiers: what is virtual and what...), Brian E Carpenter
RE: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigmis unsustainable, john.loughney
Re: [arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Andrew McGregor
[arch-d] A straw man analysis of why send-receive packet paradigm is unsustainable, Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] Some notes about HIP and SHIM6 (was Re: On identifiers: what is virtual and what...), Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] Some notes about HIP and SHIM6 (was Re: On identifiers: w hat is virtual and what...), Fergie
Re: [arch-d] Some notes about HIP and SHIM6 (was Re: On identifiers: what is virtual and what...), Noel Chiappa
RE: [arch-d] transport layer identifier evolutiion to support multihoming, John Day
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global(wasRe: thou..., Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Some notes about HIP and SHIM6 (was Re: On identifiers:what is virtual and what...), Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] transport layer identifier evolutiion to support multihoming, Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., David Meyer

Nov 30 2006

Re: [arch-d] Some notes about HIP and SHIM6 (was Re: On identifiers: what is virtual and what...), Andrew McGregor
Re: [arch-d] Some notes about HIP and SHIM6 (was Re: On identifiers: what is virtual and what...), Geoff Huston
Re: [arch-d] Finding a way forward, HeinerHummel
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Leslie
RE: [arch-d] Finding a way forward, Azinger, Marla
RE: [arch-d] Finding a way forward, Ian Peter
RE: [arch-d] Finding a way forward, Azinger, Marla
Re: [arch-d] transport layer identifier evolutiion to support multihoming, John Day
[no subject], Unknown
[arch-d] Finding a way forward, Ian Peter
Re: [arch-d] Question on what we are identifying, Geoff Huston
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Day
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Peter Sherbin
[arch-d] transport layer identifier evolutiion to support multihoming, Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] Question on what we are identifying, Peter Sherbin
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Noel Chiappa
RE: [arch-d] Question on what we are identifying, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] IPv8, Fergie
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Day
Re: [arch-d] Question on what we are identifying, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Jefsey_Morfin
Re: [arch-d] Question on what we are identifying, Pekka Nikander
RE: [arch-d] Question on what we are identifying, Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Bound, Jim
[arch-d] Question on what we are identifying, john.loughney
[arch-d] Some notes about HIP and SHIM6 (was Re: On identifiers: what is virtual and what...), Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Day
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Day
[arch-d] IPv8, Jefsey_Morfin
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Leslie
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Peter Sherbin
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Day
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Bound, Jim

Nov 29 2006

Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Leslie
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Day
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Peter Sherbin
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Leslie
RE: [arch-d] On scaling of flat identifier spaces (was Re: Onidentifiers: wh..., Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., HeinerHummel
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Day
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., David Conrad
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., David Conrad

Nov 28 2006

Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., HeinerHummel
Re: [arch-d] On scaling of flat identifier spaces (was Re: On identifiers: wh..., John Day
Re: [arch-d] On scaling of flat identifier spaces (was Re: On identifiers: wh..., HeinerHummel
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Day
Re: [arch-d] Thoughts about addresses, or why the overall architecture affects routing., Peter Sherbin
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Peter Sherbin
Re: [arch-d] On scaling of flat identifier spaces (was Re: On identifiers: wh..., John Day
RE: [arch-d] On scaling of flat identifier spaces (was Re: Onidentifiers: wh..., Tony Li
Re: [arch-d] On scaling of flat identifier spaces (was Re: On identifiers: wh..., HeinerHummel
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global ..., Brian E Carpenter
Re: [arch-d] On scaling of flat identifier spaces (was Re: On identifiers: wh..., John Day
Re: [arch-d] On scaling of flat identifier spaces (was Re: On identifiers: wh..., Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] On scaling of flat identifier spaces (was Re: On identifiers: wh..., John Day
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., David Conrad
Re: [arch-d] On scaling of flat identifier spaces (was Re: On identifiers: wh..., David Conrad
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global ..., David Conrad
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global ..., David Conrad
RE: [arch-d] On scaling of flat identifier spaces (was Re:On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global), louise.burness
Re: [arch-d] On scaling of flat identifier spaces (was Re: On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global), Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] Thoughts about addresses, or why the overall architecture affects routing., Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global ..., Brian E Carpenter
[arch-d] Long term and short term fixes in parallel, Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global ..., Vince Fuller

Nov 27 2006

Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global ..., John Day
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Day
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what isglobal(wasRe: thou..., Ian Peter
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global(wasRe: thou..., David Meyer
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global(wasRe: thou..., Geoff Huston
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global ..., Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., HeinerHummel
Re: [arch-d] Thoughts about addresses, or why the overall architecture affects routing., Peter Sherbin
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global(wasRe: thou..., John Day
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global(wasRe: thou..., Tony Li
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Day
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global(wasRe: thou..., Scott W Brim
Re: [arch-d] On scaling of flat identifier spaces (was Re: On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global), Brian E Carpenter
Re: [arch-d] On scaling of flat identifier spaces (was Re: On identifiers: wh..., HeinerHummel
[arch-d] On scaling of flat identifier spaces (was Re: On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global), Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] Thoughts about addresses, or why the overall architecture affects routing., Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global ..., Brian E Carpenter
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re: thou..., David Conrad
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global ..., David Conrad
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., David Conrad
Re: [arch-d] Thoughts about addresses, or why the overall architecture affects routing., David Conrad

Nov 24 2006

RE: [arch-d] Thoughts about addresses, or why the overall architecture affects routing., Bound, Jim

Nov 24 2006

RE: [arch-d] Thoughts about addresses, or why the overall architecture affects routing., John Day
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global(wasRe: thou..., Jefsey_Morfin
RE: [arch-d] Thoughts about addresses, or why the overall architecture affects routing., Peter Sherbin
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global(wasRe: thou..., John Day
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global(wasRe: thou..., Peter Sherbin
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Peter Sherbin
RE: [arch-d] Thoughts about addresses, or why the overall architecture affects routing., John Day
RE: [arch-d] Thoughts about addresses, or why the overall architecture affects routing., Peter Sherbin
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global(wasRe: thou..., John Day
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global(wasRe: thou..., Tony Li
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re: thou..., Peter Sherbin
Re: [arch-d] About Location and Identifier, Noel Chiappa
[arch-d] About Location and Identifier, William Lipkind
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global(wasRe: thou..., John Day
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global(wasRe: thou..., Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., David Barak
RE: [arch-d] Nomadism vs. Mobility (was Re:Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?), Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] Nomadism vs. Mobility (was Re:Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?), Brian E Carpenter
Re: [arch-d] Nomadism vs. Mobility (was Re:Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?), Scott W Brim
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Day
Re: [arch-d] Nomadism vs. Mobility (was Re:Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?), Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] Last Call comments on draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-05 ORCHID, Jari Arkko
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., HeinerHummel
Re: [arch-d] Nomadism vs. Mobility (was Re:Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?), Brian E Carpenter
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re: thou..., HeinerHummel
[arch-d] Nomadism vs. Mobility (was Re:Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?), Pekka Nikander
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., John Day
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., David Conrad
[arch-d] RFC 1958 Ter (RFC 3439 Bis), Jefsey_Morfin
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re:thoughts), Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re:thoughts), John Day
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (wasRe: thou..., Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re:thoughts), Bound, Jim
RE: [arch-d] Thoughts about mobility, multi-homing, and architecture, Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re: thou..., Noel Chiappa
RE: [arch-d] Thoughts about addresses, or why the overall architecture affects routing., John Day
RE: [arch-d] Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?, John Day
RE: [arch-d] Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?, Geoff Huston
Re: [arch-d] Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?, John Day
RE: [arch-d] Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?, John Day
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re: thoughts), John Day

Nov 23 2006

Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re: thou..., David Conrad
RE: [arch-d] It's the routing, people!, Schliesser, Benson
RE: [arch-d] Thoughts about addresses, or why the overall architecture affects routing., Schliesser, Benson
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re: thoughts), Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re: thou..., Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re: thou..., David Conrad
Re: [arch-d] Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?, David Conrad
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re: thoughts), Pekka Nikander
RE: [arch-d] on design of ASN-based BGP routing table, william(at)elan.net
RE: [arch-d] Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?, Schliesser, Benson
RE: [arch-d] on design of ASN-based BGP routing table, Schliesser, Benson
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re: thoughts), Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re: thou..., HeinerHummel
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re: thoughts), Jefsey_Morfin
Re: [arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re: thoughts), John Day
[arch-d] On identifiers: what is virtual and what is global (was Re: thoughts), Pekka Nikander
[arch-d] Thoughts about mobility, multi-homing, and architecture, Pekka Nikander
[arch-d] SLS/IRIS, the handle system, and other potential DNS replacements (was Re: thoughts), Pekka Nikander
Re: [arch-d] Last Call comments on draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-05 ORCHID, Pekka Nikander

Nov 22 2006

RE: [arch-d] thoughts, Bound, Jim
Re: [arch-d] thoughts, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [arch-d] thoughts, John Day
Re: [arch-d] thoughts, Ted Hardie

Nov 21 2006

Re: [arch-d] thoughts, RJ Atkinson
Re: [arch-d] thoughts, John Day
Re: [arch-d] thoughts, David Conrad
Re: [arch-d] Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?, David Conrad
Re: [arch-d] thoughts, Jefsey_Morfin
Re: [arch-d] thoughts, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [arch-d] thoughts, RJ Atkinson
Re: [arch-d] thoughts, RJ Atkinson
Re: [arch-d] Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [arch-d] thoughts, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [arch-d] Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?, Brian E Carpenter
ORCHIDs (Was: Re: [arch-d] thoughts), Jari Arkko
Re: [arch-d] thoughts, Brian E Carpenter
[arch-d] Last Call comments on draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-05 ORCHID, jarno.rajahalme
Re: [arch-d] Whose job is it, anyway?, HeinerHummel
Re: [arch-d] Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?, Patrik Fältström
Re: [arch-d] thoughts, David Conrad
Re: [arch-d] Whose job is it, anyway?, Jefsey_Morfin
Re: [arch-d] thoughts, Ted Hardie

Nov 20 2006

Re: [arch-d] Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?, David Conrad
RE: [arch-d] thoughts, jarno.rajahalme
Re: [arch-d] Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?, Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?, Wesley Eddy
[arch-d] Whose job is it, anyway?, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [arch-d] Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?, Noel Chiappa
Re: [arch-d] thoughts, Pekka Nikander
RE: [arch-d] thoughts, jarno.rajahalme
Re: [arch-d] Primary and lesser names, or layers of indirection?, Pekka Nikander

Mail converted by MHonArc