Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Main Archive Directory]

Feb 04 2004

Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, David Maxwell
Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, Mark Foster
Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, Peter Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, Peter Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, David Maxwell
Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, Peter Sergeant
1a Inventory of Problems - Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, Bart Schaefer
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Paul Tenny
RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Andreas Saurwein
Re: [Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, Alan DeKok
[Asrg] Spooked mail addresses, Christopher Bird
RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Chris
RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Mark Baugher
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Andreas Saurwein
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Seth Breidbart
[Asrg] 0.General - News Articles, Andreas Saurwein
RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Andreas Saurwein
RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Andreas Saurwein
RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Andreas Saurwein
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Philip Miller
RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Chris
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Seth Breidbart
RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Andreas Saurwein
RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Walter Dnes

Feb 03 2004

[Asrg] 1. Analysis - Subgroup is suspended, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: RE: [Asrg] 2. C/R - Exploits, Jon Kyme
RE: [Asrg] 2. C/R - Exploits, Eric Dean
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Bounces and Attachments, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Challenges?, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Challenges?, Peter J. Holzer
[Asrg] 0. General - Challenges?, Jon Kyme
[Asrg] 0. General - Pointer to resource for studying existing standards, Brett Watson
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Bounces and Attachments, John Levine

Feb 02 2004

Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Bounces and Attachments, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Bounces and Attachments, Peter J. Holzer
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Bounces and Attachments, Alan DeKok
[Asrg] 0. General - Soliciting Volunteers for Subgroups, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Bounces and Attachments, Peter J. Holzer
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Bounces and Attachments, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 2. C/R - Exploits, Jon Kyme
2a. Best Current Practices - Re: [Asrg] Getting SMTP "Bounce email" part of RFC changed... forget binary attachments, Peter J. Holzer
[Asrg] 0. General - Bounces and Attachments, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 2. C/R - Exploits, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Getting SMTP "Bounce email" part of RFC changed... forget binary attachments, Dr. Jeffrey Race
[Asrg] Getting SMTP "Bounce email" part of RFC changed... forget binary attachments, Jim Witte
RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Brett Watson

Feb 01 2004

Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Seth Breidbart
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Paul Tenny
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Paul Tenny

Jan 31 2004

RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Eric Dean
RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Eric Dean

Jan 30 2004

3c. message verification (Was Re: [Asrg] Re: 2. Uselessness of C/R), Bruce Lilly
Re: [Asrg] 3b - LMAP/SPF/etc - a request for clarification, Yakov Shafranovich

Jan 29 2004

Re: [Asrg] 3b - LMAP/SPF/etc - a request for clarification, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Art Pollard
[Asrg] 3b - LMAP/SPF/etc - a request for clarification, Fridrik Skulason
Re: RE: 2. Uselessness of C/R RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge R espo nse, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 2. C/R - Exploits for CAPTCHAs, Jon Kyme
RE: 2. Uselessness of C/R RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge R espo nse, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: 2. Uselessness of C/R RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge R espo nse, Paul Tenny
[Asrg] 2. Legal - FTC Seeks Public Comment on Adult Content Spam Rule, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: 2. Uselessness of C/R, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Re: 2. Uselessness of C/R, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Re: 2. Uselessness of C/R, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Re: 2. Uselessness of C/R, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Re: 2. Uselessness of C/R, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Re: 2. Uselessness of C/R, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: 2. Uselessness of C/R RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Respo nse, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Jan 28 2004

Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP ServiceExtension' to Proposed Standard, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: 2. Uselessness of C/R, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 3b. SMTP Session Verification - Update on LMAP BOF, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: 2. Uselessness of C/R RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Paul Tenny
Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension'to Proposed Standard, Carl Malamud
RE: [Asrg] Re: 2. Uselessness of C/R, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] Re: 2. Uselessness of C/R, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP ServiceExtension' to Proposed Standard, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Bart Schaefer
Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension'to Proposed Standard, Carl Malamud
Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP ServiceExtension' to Proposed Standard, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: 2. Uselessness of C/R RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Eric Dean
Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Bart Schaefer
2. Uselessness of C/R RE: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Philip Miller
[Asrg] RE: 2. C/R - Exploits for CAPTCHAs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] 2. C/R - Exploits for CAPTCHAs, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Re: 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension'to Proposed Standard, wayne
[Asrg] Its all over for Challenge Response, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension'to Proposed Standard, Carl Malamud
Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension'to Proposed Standard, B. Johannessen
Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' to Proposed Standard, John Levine
Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP ServiceExtension' to Proposed Standard, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension'to Proposed Standard, Philip Miller

Jan 27 2004

[Asrg] 2. Legal - Last Call: 'A No Soliciting SMTP Service Extension' toProposed Standard, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 3b. SMTP Session Verification - BOF on LMAP at Seoul, Yakov Shafranovich

Jan 24 2004

[Asrg] 0. General - New Mailing List for Discussions on Replacing SMTP/etc., Yakov Shafranovich

Jan 23 2004

Re: [Asrg] 1a. Inventory of Problems - Causes, Za'mbori, Zolta'n

Jan 22 2004

[Asrg] 0. General - RMX and CRI mailing lists closed, Yakov Shafranovich

Jan 21 2004

Re: RE: [Asrg] 3b. LMAP - Another LMAP variant "IMX", Jon Kyme
[Asrg] 1a. Inventory of Problems - Causes, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] 3b. LMAP - Another LMAP variant "IMX", Eric D. Williams

Jan 19 2004

Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
[Asrg] 0. General - Mailing list summary, Peter Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, John Levine
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok

Jan 18 2004

Re: [Asrg] 3b. SMTP Session Verification - explicit source routes], Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 3b. SMTP Session Verification - explicit source routes, Za'mbori, Zolta'n
Re: [Asrg] 3b. SMTP Session Verification - explicit source routes], Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 3b. SMTP Session Verification - explicit source routes], Daniel Feenberg
Re: [Asrg] alok - penny black variation, Viktor S. Grishchenko
Re: [Asrg] 3b. SMTP Session Verification - explicit source routes, Za'mbori, Zolta'n
Re: [Asrg] 3b. SMTP Session Verification - explicit source routes], Jon Kyme

Jan 17 2004

Re: [Asrg] 3b. SMTP Session Verification - explicit source routes], Za'mbori, Zolta'n
Re: [Asrg] 3b. SMTP Session Verification - explicit source routes, Jon Kyme
[Asrg] 3b. SMTP Session Verification - explicit source routes, Za'mbori, Zolta'n
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, John Levine
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Daniel Feenberg

Jan 16 2004

Re: [Asrg] 3b. LMAP - Another LMAP variant "IMX", Jon Kyme
[Asrg] 3c. Message Verification - Description of New Subgroup, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 3b. SMTP Session Verification - Description of New Subgroup, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 2c. Abuse Reporting Standards - Description of New Subgroup, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 2b. Filtering Standards - Description of New Subgroup, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 2a. Best Current Practices - Description of New Subgroup, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 1. Problem Analysis - Description of Analysis Subgroup, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 1a. Inventory of Problems - Description of New Subgroup, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 0. General - Soliciting Volunteers for Subgroups, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 3b. LMAP - Another LMAP variant "IMX", Yakov Shafranovich

Jan 15 2004

Re: [Asrg] 3b. LMAP - Another LMAP variant "IMX", Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 3b. LMAP - Another LMAP variant "IMX", david nicol
Re: [Asrg] 3b. LMAP - Another LMAP variant "IMX", GertJan Hagenaars
Re: [Asrg] 3b. LMAP - Another LMAP variant "IMX", Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 3b. LMAP - Another LMAP variant "IMX", david nicol
Re: [Asrg] 3b. LMAP - Another LMAP variant "IMX", david nicol

Jan 14 2004

[Asrg] 0. General - Messaging Anti-Abuse Working Group, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 3b. LMAP - Another LMAP variant "IMX", Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 3b. LMAP - Another LMAP variant "IMX", Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 3b. LMAP - Another LMAP variant "IMX", Philip Miller
[Asrg] 3b. LMAP - Another LMAP variant "IMX", Yakov Shafranovich

Jan 12 2004

Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - DNS + PKI - Yahoo's "Domain Keys", david nicol

Jan 11 2004

Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Philip Miller
[Asrg] 0. General - Old ASRG site has been taken down, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - New Subgroups being formed, Yakov Shafranovich

Jan 10 2004

[Asrg] 0. General - New Subgroups being formed, Yakov Shafranovich

Jan 09 2004

[Asrg] 0. General - Changes to Posting Guidelines, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Conference on Email and Anti-Spam Preliminary Call for Papers, Steve Atkins
[Asrg] 0. General - New website for the ASRG, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 2. Analysis - Would DNS/TLD policies affect spammers?, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Jon Kyme

Jan 08 2004

RE: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Matthew Elvey
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse reporting email [Was: Abuse Reporting standard], Andrzej Filip
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse reporting email [Was: Abuse Reporting standard], Jon Kyme
RE: [Asrg] Has anybody thought about using Kerberos to authenticate E-mail senders, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse reporting email [Was: Abuse Reporting standard], Andrzej Filip
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Has anybody thought about using Kerberos to authenticate E-mail senders, GertJan Hagenaars
[Asrg] Has anybody thought about using Kerberos to authenticate E-mailsenders, Jeff_Silverman
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, John Levine
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Art Pollard
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, GertJan Hagenaars
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, John Levine
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, John Levine
Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Define Spam, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - ASRG Research Agenda, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - ASRG Research Agenda, B. Johannessen
[Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - "No Soliciting" ESMTP Extension - New Draft, Yakov Shafranovich

Jan 07 2004

[Asrg] 0. General - ASRG Research Agenda, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Computational - MSFT's "Penny Black", Bob Atkinson
Re: RE: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Jon Kyme
RE: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Tom Bartel
Re: [Asrg] alok - penny black variation, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Brett Watson
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Art Pollard
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, John Levine
Re: [Asrg] alok - penny black variation, tjacobs
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Yakov Shafranovich

Jan 06 2004

Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 7. BCP - Abuse Reporting standard, Jon Kyme
RE: [Asrg] Latest version of the LMAP discussion paper, Eric D. Williams

Jan 05 2004

Re: [Asrg] alok - yet another idea, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] alok - yet another idea, Za'mbori, Zolta'n
Re: [Asrg] alok - yet another idea, Philip Miller
aRe: [Asrg] 0. General - Define Spam, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Define Spam, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] alok - yet another idea, Alok Menghrajani
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Define Spam, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] LMAP - positive press for our work., Matthew Elvey
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Define Spam, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Define Spam, Art Pollard
Re: Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Define Spam, Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Define Spam, Alan DeKok
RE: RE: [Asrg] 0. General - Define Spam, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Define Spam, Jon Kyme
Re: RE: [Asrg] 0. General - Define Spam, Dave Crocker
RE: [Asrg] 0. General - Define Spam, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Define Spam, John Levine
Re: [Asrg] alok - encrypted email, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] alok - penny black variation, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - idea to reduce problems with message content., denny

Jan 04 2004

Re: [Asrg] 0. General - idea to reduce problems with message content., Vinny
RE: [Asrg] 0. General - idea to reduce problems with message content., Denny Figuerres
RE: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Denny Figuerres
RE: [Asrg] alok - penny black variation, Denny Figuerres
[Asrg] alok - encrypted email, Alok Menghrajani
[Asrg] alok - penny black variation, Alok Menghrajani
[Asrg] 0. General - Define Spam, Jon Kyme
[Asrg] new ASRG charter, irtf-chair
Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Vern Paxson

Jan 03 2004

Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Jon Kyme

Jan 02 2004

Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Vern Paxson

Dec 31 2003

Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Vern Paxson
Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Philip Miller

Dec 30 2003

Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, irtf-chair
[Asrg] Re: Forgery in SMTP, Matthew Elvey
Re: [Asrg] 0. General- useful ideas from other areas of research., Art Pollard
[Asrg] 0. General- useful ideas from other areas of research., John Fenley

Dec 29 2003

Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Bayesian filtering and Yahoo (Was Re: C/R), Alan DeKok
[Asrg] 6, Proposals - SMTP Envelope Verification vs. Message Verification, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Bayesian filtering and Yahoo (Was Re: C/R), Matthew Elvey
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - DNS-Based - RMX -- After reading thearchive, david nicol
Re: [Asrg] Caching an authentication value, david nicol

Dec 28 2003

Re: [Asrg] Re: 03.1 Re: Forgery in SMTP (applying flame retardent), Alan DeKok

Dec 27 2003

[Asrg] Caching an authentication value, Frank McCoy
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Computational - MSFT's "Penny Black", Thomas Harold
Re: [Asrg] Re: 03.1 Re: Forgery in SMTP, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Computational - MSFT's "Penny Black", david nicol
Re: [Asrg] Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postageproject, david nicol
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Computational - MSFT's "Penny Black", Thomas Harold
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Computational - MSFT's "Penny Black", Vinny
Re: [Asrg] Re: 03.1 Re: Forgery in SMTP (applying flame retardent), Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Computational - MSFT's "Penny Black", Thomas Harold

Dec 26 2003

Re: [Asrg] Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project, Vinny
[Asrg] Re: 03.1 Re: Forgery in SMTP, gep2
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - C/R and "callbacks", Philip Miller
[Asrg] 6. Proposals - Computational - MSFT's "Penny Black", Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project, Art Pollard
[Asrg] 6. Proposals - C/R and "callbacks", Tony Toews
Re: [Asrg] Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project, Art Pollard
[Asrg] Microsoft publicly announces Penny Black PoW postage project, Steve Schear
[Asrg] Re: 03.1 Re: Forgery in SMTP (applying flame retardent), Matthew Elvey

Dec 25 2003

Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: LMAP - Forwarding Comment and Recommended Changes, Jon Kyme
Re: Forgery in SMTP (was [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols), Walter Dnes

Dec 24 2003

Re: Forgery in SMTP (was [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols), Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, David Maxwell
Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, David Maxwell
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: LMAP - Forwarding Comment and RecommendedChanges, Matthew Elvey
Forgery in SMTP (was [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than inother protocols), Philip Miller
[Asrg] 0. General - search of address hiding recommendations, Za'mbori, Zolta'n
[Asrg] 2a. Analysis - Addressing Identity Exploits, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Exploits for identity, Tom Bartel

Dec 23 2003

[Asrg] 1. Inventory of Problems - Costs of email, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 6. Proposals - LMAP - Similarities in XMPP, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 6. Proposals - C/R and "callbacks", Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 1. Inventory of Problems - Email vs. IM, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 0. General - Possible problems with IETF's servers, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, John R. Levine
[Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
[Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, John R. Levine
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Za'mbori, Zolta'n
Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, John R. Levine
Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Tony Toews
[Asrg] [2] Spam Statistics, Eric Dean
Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Yakov Shafranovich

Dec 22 2003

Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Troy Rollo
[Asrg] 0. General - Legal - CAN-SPAM effects, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
[Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Jon Kyme
[Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Za'mbori, Zolta'n
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Jon Kyme

Dec 21 2003

Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Za'mbori, Zolta'n
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Not sure where this fits, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Za'mbori, Zolta'n
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 1. Inventory of Problems - SMTP, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Za'mbori, Zolta'n
[Asrg] 0. General - Not sure where this fits, Chris
[Asrg] 0. General - Revocation of Posting Privileges for Hector Santos, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 1. Inventory of Problems - SMTP, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 1. Inventory of Problems - SMTP, Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Markus Stumpf
[Asrg] 6. Proposals - DMP comments, Hector Santos

Dec 20 2003

Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - DNS + PKI - Yahoo's "Domain Keys", Mark Baugher
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Za'mbori, Zolta'n

Dec 19 2003

Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Hector Santos, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] Re: anti-spam measure (was: Undeliverable mail), Claus Assmann
[Asrg] 0. General - Moderation of the List, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: Undeliverable mail - for Markus, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: Undeliverable mail - for Markus, Mark
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Hector Santos, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: Undeliverable mail - for Markus, Hector Santos
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Hector Santos, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Hector Santos, Hector Santos
Re: [Asrg] Re: Undeliverable mail, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Hector Santos, Dr. Jeffrey Race
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Markus, Hector Santos
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Hector Santos, Hector Santos
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Markus, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Markus, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Markus, Hector Santos
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Hector Santos, Philip Miller
[Asrg] Re: Undeliverable mail, Hector Santos
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Hector Santos, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Hector Santos, Hector Santos
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Yakov Shafranovich

Dec 18 2003

Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Hector Santos
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Hector Santos, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Hector Santos, Hector Santos
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - For Hector Santos, Philip Miller
[Asrg] 0. General - For Hector Santos, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 1. Inventory of Problems - SMTP, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - LMAP - Latest version of the LMAP discussionpaper, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Hector Santos
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, David Maxwell
[Asrg] 6. Proposals - LMAP - New Draft of DMP published, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals - Verification via RCPT TO callback, Hector Santos
[Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals - Verification via RCPT TO callback, Hector Santos
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Za'mbori, Zolta'n
[Asrg] 6. Proposals - LMAP - Call for volunteers, Yakov Shafranovich

Dec 17 2003

Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: LMAP - Forwarding Comment and Recommended Changes, Richard Rognlie
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: LMAP - Forwarding Comment and Recommended Changes, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, ipeter at bigpond.net.au
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - DNS + PKI - Yahoo's "Domain Keys", Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: LMAP - Forwarding Comment and Recommended Changes, Mark E. Mallett
Re: [Asrg] 1. Inventory of Problems - SMTP, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labelling (?), Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 1. Inventory of Problems - SMTP, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labelling (?), mathew
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, mathew
[Asrg] 0. General - SpamAssasin deployed on IETF servers, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals - C/R and CRI, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Philip Miller
6. Proposals - C/R and CRI (was: Re: [Asrg] 6. General - IPR - Patentson C/R), Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 1. Inventory of Problems - SMTP, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Markus Stumpf

Dec 16 2003

Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Claus Assmann
Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
[Asrg] 1. Inventory of Problems - SMTP, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Mark Baugher
[Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Hector Santos
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
RE: [Asrg] 0. General - IPR - Patents on C/R, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Hector Santos
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Hector Santos
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Review of the CRI subgroup, Yakov Shafranovich

Dec 15 2003

Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: LMAP - Forwarding Comment and Recommended Changes, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: LMAP - Forwarding Comment and RecommendedChanges, Daniel Feenberg
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: LMAP - Forwarding Comment and RecommendedChanges, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: LMAP - Forwarding Comment and Recommended Changes, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - Review of the CRI subgroup, J C Lawrence

Dec 14 2003

[Asrg] 6. Proposals: LMAP - Forwarding Comment and Recommended Changes, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Daniel Feenberg
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Daniel Feenberg
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Marc A. Pelletier
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Daniel Feenberg
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Brett Watson
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Mark
[Asrg] Re: 4a. Taxonomy. Censorship vs. filtering and playing lawyer, John R. Levine
[Asrg] 0. General - Administrative - For Hector Santos, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Yakov Shafranovich

Dec 13 2003

RE: RE: [Asrg] 4a. Taxonomy. Censorship vs. filtering, Denny Figuerres
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
Re: RE: [Asrg] 4a. Taxonomy. Censorship vs. filtering, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 4a. Taxonomy. Censorship vs. filtering, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 4a. Taxonomy. Censorship vs. filtering, Alan DeKok
RE: [Asrg] 4a. Taxonomy. Censorship vs. filtering, Denny Figuerres
Re: [Asrg] 4a. Taxonomy. Censorship vs. filtering, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Tomi Panula-Ontto
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Mark
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, David Maxwell

Dec 12 2003

[Asrg] 4a. Taxonomy. Censorship vs. filtering, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
RE: [Asrg] 2 Questions: History of "Challenge-Response" SPAMfilter and Info re. Julian Byrne, rm
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 2 Questions: History of "Challenge-Response" SPAM filter and Info re. Julian Byrne, Hector Santos
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - DNS + PKI - Yahoo's "Domain Keys", Jim Fenton
RE: [Asrg] 2 Questions: History of "Challenge-Response" SPAM filter and Info re. Julian Byrne, Gilman Research Services
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK - and a LMAP note, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK - and a LMAP note, Fridrik Skulason
Re: [ASRG] 0. General - Etymology trivia: "virus", Hector Santos
[Asrg] 0. General - IPR - Patents on C/R, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 0. General - News Article - Man Arrested under the Virginia's Spam Law, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [ASRG] 0. General - Etymology trivia: "virus", Chris
Re: [ASRG] 0. General - Etymology trivia: "virus", Mark
[Asrg] 2 Questions: History of "Challenge-Response" SPAM filter and Info re. Julian Byrne, Gilman Research Services
[ASRG] 0. General - Etymology trivia: "virus", Brett Watson

Dec 11 2003

Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, Philip Miller
[Asrg] 0. General - What ASRG looks like, Peter Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, Tomi Panula-Ontto
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, Fridrik Skulason
Re: [Asrg] 0. General - interesting?, Justin Mason
[Asrg] 0. General - interesting?, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, David Maxwell
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - DNS + PKI - Yahoo's "Domain Keys", Mark Baugher
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, B. Johannessen

Dec 10 2003

Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, Mark
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - DNS + PKI - Yahoo's "Domain Keys", Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, David Maxwell
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
[Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, David Maxwell
RE: [Asrg] 0. General - Review of the CRI subgroup, Eric Dean
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, David Maxwell
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, Fridrik Skulason
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, Tomi Panula-Ontto
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, Tomi Panula-Ontto
[Asrg] 0. General - spammers owning php/apache, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - DNS + PKI - Yahoo's "Domain Keys", Fridrik Skulason
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, Fridrik Skulason
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, Bart Schaefer
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - DNS + PKI - Yahoo's "Domain Keys", Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - DNS + PKI - Yahoo's "Domain Keys", Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: MTA MARK, Hector Santos

Mail converted by MHonArc