Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Jul 31 2004
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Walter Dnes
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Walter Dnes
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Seth Breidbart
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Bill Cole
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., David Wall
• Re: [Asrg] How would SPF or Sender ID stopped this attack, Barry Shein
• Re: [Asrg] SANOG/APCAUCE presentation: Tracking A Zombie Army, Walter Dnes
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Barry Shein
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Barry Shein
• Jul 31 2004
• Re: [Asrg] MTA registration means Path registration, Jim Witte
• Re: [Asrg] MTA registration means Path registration, Alan DeKok
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Roger B.A. Klorese
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF?, Roger B.A. Klorese
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Roger B.A. Klorese
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Roger B.A. Klorese
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF?, Roger B.A. Klorese
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Alan DeKok
• Re: Gateways versus routing (was Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? ...), Alan DeKok
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF?, Alan DeKok
• [Asrg] BCP suggestion: port-blocking by ISPs, Walter Dnes
• Re: [Asrg] MTA registration means Path registration, Dave Crocker
• Re: [Asrg] MASS BOF at IETF 60, Dave Crocker
• Re: Gateways versus routing (was Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? ...), Dave Crocker
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., der Mouse
• Re: [Asrg] How would SPF or Sender ID stopped this attack, Seth Breidbart