Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Jul 29 2004
• Re[2]: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Pete McNeil
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., der Mouse
• [Asrg] MASS BOF at IETF 60, Jim Fenton
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Barry Shein
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., David Maxwell
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Barry Shein
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., David Maxwell
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Barry Shein
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., der Mouse
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? (was: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.), der Mouse
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? (was: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.), Jon Kyme
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Paul Tenny
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? (was: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.), Dave Crocker
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? (was: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.), Dave Crocker
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., RSBX
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., David Maxwell
• [Asrg] Re: Why SPF?, Claus Assmann
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? (was: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.), Alan DeKok
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Tony Finch
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Roger B.A. Klorese
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? (was: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.), Alan DeKok
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Alan DeKok
• Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof., Bill Cole
• [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? (was: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.), Jon Kyme
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? (was: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.), Barry Shein