Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Main Archive Directory]

Jul 22 2003

Re: [Asrg] 0. ASRG Website updated, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 7c. Best Practices Documents - Mass Mailers (was Re: [Asrg]New to the list), Yakov Shafranovich

Jul 22 2003

Re: [Asrg] 4d. Consent Framework - Language for consent, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 4d. Consent Framework - Language for consent, John Fenley
[Asrg] 4d. Consent Framework - Language for consent, Yakov Shafranovich

Jul 21 2003

Re: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (was : RE: Two ways to look at spam), eric at infobro.com
RE: 3. Requirements - IPv6 support (was Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_ XMIT DNS record), Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (was : RE: Two ways to look at spam), Alan DeKok
4.d. mapping personal definitions of spam to the consent framework (was RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, C Wegrzyn
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Danny Angus
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Alan DeKok

Jul 20 2003

Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, John Fenley
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Bob Wyman
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Scott Nelson
RE: [Asrg] Remote mailing, Eric D. Williams
Re: 3. Requirements - IPv6 support (was Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record), Walter Dnes
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Must Address Issue of Hijacked Computers, Eric D. Williams
RE: 3. Requirements - IPv6 support (was Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record), Eric D. Williams
RE: 3. Requirements - IPv6 support (was Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record), Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Mark Ferguson
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Eric D. Williams
[Asrg] New to the list, Mark Ferguson

Jul 19 2003

RE: 3. Requirements - IPv6 support (was Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record), Paul Judge
Re: 3. Requirements - IPv6 support (was Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record), Dave Crocker

Jul 18 2003

Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] 0. ASRG Website updated, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 0. General - News Article - [IP] President Bush usingchallenge-response for hisemail, gep2

Jul 17 2003

[Asrg] Re: RAPNAP/OMX Re: 6. Proposal - Sender Pays (was RE: [Asrg]Forbes: Pay up ), Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Paul Judge
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Must Address Issue of Hijacked Computers, Bob Wyman
[Asrg] 3. Requirements - Must Address Issue of Hijacked Computers, gep2
[Asrg] 1. Problem Inventory - Core solutions, gep2

Jul 16 2003

RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Bob Wyman
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, david nicol
RAPNAP/OMX Re: 6. Proposal - Sender Pays (was RE: [Asrg] Forbes:Pay up ), david nicol
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Bob Wyman
RE: [Asrg] 0. ASRG Website updated, Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam HijackingNetwork, Philip Miller
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] [IP] Link to EU Anti-Spam Legislation, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam HijackingNetwork, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam HijackingNetwork, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, Jon Kyme
[Asrg] [IP] Link to EU Anti-Spam Legislation, gep2
[Asrg] The 3rd Annual Nigerian EMail Conference, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] 0. ASRG Website updated, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: 6. Proposal - Sender Pays (was RE: [Asrg] Forbes: Pay up ), Yakov Shafranovich

Jul 15 2003

Re: 6. Proposal - Sender Pays (was RE: [Asrg] Forbes: Pay up ), mathew
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, mathew
RE: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Pete McNeil
6. Proposal - Sender Pays (was RE: [Asrg] Forbes: Pay up ), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, Alan DeKok
[Asrg] Summaries online..., C. Wegrzyn
[Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, gep2
[Asrg] draft-crocker-spam-techconsider, gep2
[Asrg] Webforms, gep2
[Asrg] Web forms, gep2
[Asrg] Web forms, gep2
RE: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, gep2
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] Forbes: Pay up, mathew
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, mathew

Jul 14 2003

[Asrg] 0. ASRG Website updated, Paul Judge
[Asrg] Re: 3. Requirements - IPv6 support, Andrew Akehurst
Re: 3. Requirements - IPv6 support (was Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMITDNS record), C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record, Yakov Shafranovich
3. Requirements - IPv6 support (was Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record), Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record, Yakov Shafranovich
4. Survey - Consent Model - Tokens (was Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???), Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Yakov Shafranovich

Jul 13 2003

[Asrg] re: UNSUBSCRIBE, DKill123
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record, Scott Nelson
RE: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: 1. Inventory of Problems - Exploitation (was RE: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements), Vern Paxson
[Asrg] 3. Requirements - Must Address Issue of Hijacked Computers, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record, Daniel Feenberg
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record, Daniel Feenberg
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record, Florian Weimer
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record, Daniel Feenberg
[Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record, Walter Dnes
[Asrg] 1. Problem Inventory - Core solutions, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, Yakov Shafranovich

Jul 12 2003

[Asrg] (no subject), Patrick Galvin
RE: [Asrg] My apologies to this list, Danny Angus
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, Jon Kyme

Jul 11 2003

Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Slowing down spammers - thoughts?, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] Slowing down spammers - thoughts?, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam HijackingNetwork, Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Justin Mason
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, Raymond S Brand
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Pete McNeil
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, Raymond S Brand
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Jason Steiner
Re: [Asrg] Slowing down spammers - thoughts?, Scott Nelson
Re: [Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam Hijacking Network, Alan DeKok
RE: [Asrg] Slowing down spammers - thoughts?, Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] Maintaining Anonymity in an Authenticated System, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 0.General - News Article - NYT Reports Porn Spam HijackingNetwork, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (was: RE: Two way), Kurt Magnusson
RE: [Asrg] Re: The Solution To Spam - The First Response (Ken Hirsch), Danny Angus
Re: [Asrg] Slowing down spammers - thoughts?, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] Slowing down spammers - thoughts?, Bill Cole
[Asrg] Slowing down spammers - thoughts?, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Walter Dnes

Jul 10 2003

Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (was : RE: Two ways to look at spam), Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Maintaining Anonymity in an Authenticated System, Andrew Akehurst
Re: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (was : RE: Two ways to look at spam), C. Wegrzyn
Re: 6. Solutions - Longterm - Replacing SMTP (Re: [Asrg] Bogus reasoning), Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (wa s : RE: Two ways to look at spam), Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, John Fenley
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, John Fenley
Re: [Asrg] Maintaining Anonymity in an Authenticated System, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Alan DeKok
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Kurt Magnusson
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Elric Pedder
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Andrew Akehurst
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Richard Johnson
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Pete McNeil
Re: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (wa s : RE: Two ways to look at spam), Dave Crocker
Re: 6. Solutions - Longterm - Replacing SMTP (Re: [Asrg] Bogus reasoning), Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] [OffTopic] Looking for address to complain to Hotmail, Kee Hinckley
Re: 4. Consent Model - Consent Tokens (was Re: [Asrg] Nothingwill stop spam???), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Pete McNeil

Jul 09 2003

Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Article from WinXPnews on SPAM..., C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] Article from WinXPnews on SPAM..., Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Forged Paths..., Barry Shein
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Pete McNeil
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Article from WinXPnews on SPAM..., list-asrg
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Alan DeKok
[Asrg] Non-delivery, gep2
[Asrg] Consent tokens, gep2
[Asrg] Weak Web services, gep2
Re: [Asrg] Article from WinXPnews on SPAM..., Justin Mason
[Asrg] Consent systems, gep2
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Article from WinXPnews on SPAM..., Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Alan DeKok
[Asrg] Article from WinXPnews on SPAM..., C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] Forged Paths..., Daniel Feenberg
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Based on Digital Certificates, Raymond S Brand
Re: [Asrg] Forged Paths..., Florian Weimer
RE: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Pete McNeil
Re: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Andrew Akehurst
RE: [Asrg] 0. General - Group Direction, Paul Judge
Re: 1. Inventory of Problems (was RE: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization- Possible Measurements), C. Wegrzyn
Re: RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Jon Kyme
[Asrg] 6. Solutions - Based on Digital Certificates, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - document, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - document, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - document, Eric D. Williams
1. Inventory of Problems (was RE: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements), Yakov Shafranovich
4. Consent Model - Consent Tokens (was Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???), Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Forged Paths..., Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] 0. General - Group Direction, Yakov Shafranovich
6. Proposals - Signing Received paths (was Re: [Asrg] Forged Paths...), Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Forged Paths..., Art Pollard

Jul 08 2003

RE: RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Pete McNeil
Re: RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Alan DeKok
RE: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (wa s : RE: Two ways to look at spam), Barry Shein
Re: RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, C. Wegrzyn
[Asrg] Another way to detect spam....good or bad?, C. Wegrzyn
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Barry Shein
[Asrg] 0. General - IPR Document updated, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 0. General - IPR Disclosure, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Christopher Bird
Re: RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Jon Kyme
[Asrg] 6. Proposals - Replacing SMTP, gep2
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Pete McNeil
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Madscientist
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Andrew Akehurst
[Asrg] Spam, UCE, Shifting trends, Christopher Bird
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, C. Wegrzyn
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Kurt Magnusson
RE: [Asrg] 0. General - Group Direction, Paul Judge
RE: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (wa s : RE: Two ways to look at spam), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Jon Kyme
RE: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (wa s : RE: Two ways to look at spam), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Scott Nelson
Re: [Asrg] Does anyone remember what happened to...., Scott Nelson
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Pete McNeil
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Pete McNeil
Re: [Asrg] A lot of additional comments, Selby Hatch
[Asrg] 0. General - Group Direction, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Some important comments, Selby Hatch
Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Selby Hatch
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Elric Pedder
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Elric Pedder
Re: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (wa s : RE: Two ways to look at spam), Madscientist
Re: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (wa s : RE: Two ways to look at spam), Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Barry Shein
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Yakov Shafranovich

Jul 07 2003

Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Barry Shein
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - document, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Elric Pedder
RE: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - document, Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (wa s : RE: Two ways to look at spam), Barry Shein
Re: 6. Solutions - Longterm - Replacing SMTP (Re: [Asrg] Bogus reasoning), Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 3. Requirements - document, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Justin Mason
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Does anyone remember what happened to...., C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] Does anyone remember what happened to...., Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 3. Requirements - Non Spam must go through, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] [IP] A Simpler, More Personal Key to Protect Online Messages, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] [IP] A Simpler, More Personal Key to Protect Online Me ssages, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] A lot of additional comments, william
RE: [Asrg] A lot of additional comments, Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] A lot of additional comments, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] A lot of additional comments, Michael McConnell
[Asrg] Does anyone remember what happened to...., Christopher Bird
Re: [Asrg] [IP] A Simpler, More Personal Key to Protect Online Me ssages, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] [IP] A Simpler, More Personal Key to Protect Online Messages, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] draft-crocker-spam-techconsider, Florian Weimer
Re: [Asrg] [IP] A Simpler, More Personal Key to Protect Online Messages, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: Separate ISP(s) for "guaranteed delivery" ofemail, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: Separate ISP(s) for "guaranteed delivery" ofemail, william
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: Separate ISP(s) for "guaranteed delivery" ofemail, Kee Hinckley
Re: 6 - Solutions - Dependencies of DNSSEC ( was RE: [Asrg] DNSSEC no t deployable), Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
RE: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Madscientist
[Asrg] [IP] A Simpler, More Personal Key to Protect Online Messages, gep2
RE: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Yakov Shafranovich
6 - Solutions - Dependencies of DNSSEC ( was RE: [Asrg] DNSSEC not deployable), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Technical Considerations (updated draft), Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] DNSSEC not deployable, Florian Weimer
RE: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Eric Dean
[Asrg] Did you see this about Cyberangel.nl - a spammer..., C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] Some important comments, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: Separate ISP(s) for "guaranteed delivery" ofemail, C. Wegrzyn
RE: [Asrg] Some important comments, Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] Some important comments, william
RE: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - DNS Based - Security of DNS (was RE: [Asrg] DNSSEC not deployable), Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 6. Proposals - Replacing SMTP, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - DNS Based - Security of DNS (was RE: [Asrg] DNSSEC not deployable), Walter Dnes
[Asrg] 3. Requirements - Technical Considerations (updated draft), Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Vern Paxson
[Asrg] Some important comments, Brian Hamilton
Re: [Asrg] The Solution To Spam - The First Response, Scott Nelson
Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] The Solution To Spam - The First Response, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: Separate ISP(s) for "guaranteed delivery" of email, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] Choicelist - The problems, John Fenley

Jul 06 2003

[Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model (updated), Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Steven G. Willis
[Asrg] Choicelist - The problems, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, John Fenley
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Mark McCarron
RE: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, John Fenley
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, John Fenley
RE: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (wa s : RE: Two ways to look at spam), Dave Crocker
[Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Mark McCarron
[Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Mark McCarron
[Asrg] ::: G_I/E.I_-S - Moving Forward - srrrrppp, Mark McCarron
[Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Mark McCarron
RE: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements, Mark McCarron
RE: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, C. Wegrzyn
RE: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 'GIEIS' - CNET story released tomorrow, Mark McCarron
[Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Mark McCarron
[Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Mark McCarron
RE: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] ::: G_I/E.I_-S - Moving Forward - srrrrppp, gieisclownfanclub
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Steven G. Willis
RE: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Hi,Asrg,darling, nazgul
RE: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (wa s : RE: Two ways to look at spam), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] 'GIEIS' - To create 2.26 Million jobs, Mark McCarron
[Asrg] 'GIEIS' - Version 0.005 Released, Mark McCarron

Jul 05 2003

RE: [Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (was : RE: Two ways to look at spam), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] The Solution To Spam - The First Response, Ken Hirsch
RE: [Asrg] 0 - General - Summary to date?, Paul Judge
[Asrg] 'GIEIS' - Verson 0.004 Released, Mark McCarron
[Asrg] Disabling small (eg home) business and nonprofits, gep2
Re: [Asrg] Consent Systems and permission list, gep2
Re: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fifth Response, Mark McCarron
[Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Final Response?, John Fenley
Re: [Asrg] Consent systems, John Fenley
[Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Mark McCarron
[Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] Summary to date?, C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam, Bruce Stephens
Re: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fifth Response, Steven F Siirila

Jul 04 2003

Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] The Solution To Spam - The First Response, Walter Dnes
RE: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] My apologies to this list, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Consent Systems and permission list, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] My apologies to this list, Mark McCarron
[Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS, Mark McCarron
[Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS, Mark McCarron
[Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] The Solution To Spam - The First Response, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] The Solution To Spam - The First Response, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fifth Response, Mark McCarron
Re: RE: [Asrg] Consent systems, Jon Kyme
RE: 6. Solutions - DNS based - DNSSEC (was Re: [Asrg] Re: DNSSEC not deployable), Yakov Shafranovich
RE: 6. Solutions - DNS based - DNSSEC (was Re: [Asrg] Re: DNSSEC not deployable), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] Consent Systems and permission list, gep2
Re: [Asrg] Summary to date?, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS Analysis, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Consent systems, gep2
RE: [Asrg] Consent systems, Bob Wyman
Re: 6. Solutions - DNS based - DNSSEC (was Re: [Asrg] Re: DNSSEC not deployable), Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] In case anyone thought Barry was exaggerating, Alan DeKok
RE: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Bob Wyman
Re: [Asrg] Forbes: Pay up, Jed Margolin
[Asrg] Consent systems, gep2
Re: [Asrg] In case anyone thought Barry was exaggerating, Walter Dnes
[Asrg] Summary to date?, C. Wegrzyn
RE: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Bob Wyman
RE: 6. Solutions - DNS based - DNSSEC (was Re: [Asrg] Re: DNSSEC not deployable), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] Re: DNSSEC not deployable, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] In case anyone thought Barry was exaggerating, Walter Dnes
Re: 6. Solutions - DNS based - DNSSEC (was Re: [Asrg] Re: DNSSEC not deployable), Yakov Shafranovich
Re: 6. Solutions - DNS based - DNSSEC (was Re: [Asrg] Re: DNSSEC not deployable), Alan DeKok
4. Survey of Solutions - Consent (was Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???), Yakov Shafranovich
6. Proposals - Separate ISP(s) for "guaranteed delivery" of email (was re: [Asrg] Proposal: Separate ISP(s) for "guaranteed delivery" of email), Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: Separate ISP(s) for "guaranteed delivery" ofemail, Kee Hinckley
6. Solutions - DNS based - DNSSEC (was Re: [Asrg] Re: DNSSEC not deployable), Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: DNSSEC not deployable, william
Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] 6. Proposals - DNS Based - Security of DNS (was RE: [Asrg]DNSSEC not deployable), Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: Separate ISP(s) for "guaranteed delivery" of email, Walter Dnes
RE: [Asrg] DNSSEC not deployable, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] DNSSEC not deployable, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
[Asrg] Re: DNSSEC not deployable, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] DNSSEC not deployable, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] My apologies to this list, Hondin de Goot
Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Bruce Stephens
[Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Next Response, Mark McCarron
[Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Seventh Response, Mark McCarron
[Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Sixth Response, Mark McCarron
RE: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Madscientist
Re: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Yakov Shafranovich
6. Proposals - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS (was Re: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fifth Response), Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Yakov Shafranovich
6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS (was Re: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fifth Response), Yakov Shafranovich
6. Solutions - Replacing SMTP - GIEIS (was Re: [Asrg] Re: 'GIEIS' - The Fourth Response (Esa Laitinen)), Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Selby Hatch
Re: [Asrg] The Solution To Spam - The First Response, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Selby Hatch

Jul 03 2003

RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Madscientist
[Asrg] Re: 'GIEIS' - The Fourth Response (Esa Laitinen), Mark McCarron
RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Madscientist
Re: [Asrg] The Solution To Spam - The First Response, Ken Hirsch
Re: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fifth Response, Steven F Siirila
Re: RE: RE: RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam wi thin consent paradigm, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fifth Response, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fifth Response, Steven F Siirila
RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Tom Thomson
Re: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fifth Response, Mark McCarron
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Bob Wyman
RE: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fourth Response, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consentparadigm, C. Wegrzyn
RE: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Bob Wyman
RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Madscientist
RE: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Bob Wyman
[Asrg] 4. Survey of Solutions - Consent Model, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fourth Response, Mark McCarron
Re: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fifth Response, Steven F Siirila
Re: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consentparadigm, C. Wegrzyn
[Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fifth Response, Mark McCarron
Re: RE: RE: RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] The Solution To Spam - The First Response, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Madscientist
Re: [Asrg] In case anyone thought Barry was exaggerating, Alan DeKok
RE: RE: RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, C. Wegrzyn
RE: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fourth Response, Tom Thomson
RE: [Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Bob Wyman
RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Bob Wyman
Re: [Asrg] Re: The Solution To Spam - The First Response (Ken Hirsch), Ken Hirsch
RE: RE: RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Tom Thomson
Re: [Asrg] Re: The Solution To Spam - The First Response (Ken Hirsch), Philip Miller
[Asrg] Re: The Solution To Spam - The First Response (Ken Hirsch), Mark McCarron
RE: [Asrg] In case anyone thought Barry was exaggerating, Paul Judge
RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam ........, Kurt Magnusson
RE: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fourth Response, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] In case anyone thought Barry was exaggerating, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fourth Response, Hondin de Goot
Re: RE: RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Maintaining Anonymity in an Authenticated System, Andrew Akehurst
Re: [Asrg] Forbes: Pay up, Matt
Re: [Asrg] Maintaining Anonymity in an Authenticated System, Spencer Dawkins
RE: RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Tom Thomson
Re: [Asrg] Maintaining Anonymity in an Authenticated System, Andrew Akehurst
Re: [Asrg] In case anyone thought Barry was exaggerating, Walter Dnes
[Asrg] Nothing will stop spam???, Selby Hatch
Re: [Asrg] Warning people of "intent to send" large quantities of email, Jon Kyme
Re: RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fourth Response, Esa Laitinen
[Asrg] News Article - Telemarketers moving to spam, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] 'GIEIS' - The Fourth Response, Mark McCarron
[Asrg] Re: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #296 - 37 msgs, Mark McCarron
Re: 6. Solutions - Longterm - Replacing SMTP (Re: [Asrg] Bogus reasoning), Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Forbes: Pay up, Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Forbes: Pay up, Alan DeKok
RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Warning people of "intent to send" large quantities ofemail, Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] The Solution To Spam - The First Response, Ken Hirsch
RE: 6. Solutions - Longterm - Replacing SMTP (Re: [Asrg] Bogusreasoning), Daniel Feenberg
3. Requirements - Accessibility (was Re: [Asrg] News Article - Turing Tests and the Blind), Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Solutions - Digital Certificate Based (was Re:[Asrg] Certs and trusts...), C. Wegrzyn
[Asrg] RE: 6. Solutions - Longterm - Replacing SMTP (Re: [Asrg]Bogus reasoning), Yakov Shafranovich
6. Solutions - E-postage (was Re: [Asrg] Forbes: Pay up), Yakov Shafranovich

Jul 02 2003

[Asrg] Re: 6. Solutions - Digital Certificate Based (was Re: [Asrg]Certs and trusts...), Yakov Shafranovich
Re: 6. Solutions - Digital Certificate Based (was Re: [Asrg] Certs and trusts...), C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] Remote mailing, David Koblas
6. Solutions - Digital Certificate Based (was Re: [Asrg] Certs and trusts...), Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Remote mailing, David Koblas
Re: [Asrg] Forbes: Pay up, Roy S. Walker
[Asrg] Forbes: Pay up, Steve Schear
[Asrg] Certs and trusts..., C. Wegrzyn
Re: 6. Solutions - Longterm - Replacing SMTP (Re: [Asrg] Bogus reasoning), C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] Two ways to look at spam, Andrew Akehurst
RE: 6. Solutions - Longterm - Replacing SMTP (Re: [Asrg] Bogus reasoning), Elric Pedder
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: Separate ISP(s) for "guaranteed delivery" ofemail, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Paul Judge
[Asrg] 2. - Spam Characterization - Possible Measurements (was : RE: Two ways to look at spam), Paul Judge
RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Bob Wyman
Re: [Asrg] Trust, misunderstood?, C. Wegrzyn
Fwd: RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within con sent paradigm, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Proposal: Separate ISP(s) for "guaranteed delivery" of email, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] Trust, misunderstood?, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Trust, misunderstood?, Danny Angus
RE: [Asrg] 2. Problem Characterization - Defining spam within consent paradigm, Bob Wyman
Re: 6. Solutions - Longterm - Replacing SMTP (Re: [Asrg] Bogus reasoning), C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] Remote mailing, Barry Shein
Re: 6. Solutions - Longterm - Replacing SMTP (Re: [Asrg] Bogus reasoning), C. Wegrzyn
Re: 6. Solutions - Longterm - Replacing SMTP (Re: [Asrg] Bogus reasoning), Barry Shein
Re: 6. Solutions - Longterm - Replacing SMTP (Re: [Asrg] Bogus reasoning), Barry Shein

Mail converted by MHonArc