Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Apr 22 2004
• Re: [Asrg] Re: the e-postage argument, Seth Breidbart
• RE: [Asrg] Re: E-postage, Tom Thomson
• Re: [Asrg] 2b. SMTP-VERIFY - Request to publish LMAP proposals, Alan DeKok
• RE: [Asrg] Re: E-postage, Tom Thomson
• Re: [Asrg] Re: E-postage, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: [Asrg] Usefulness of wholesale blocking of attachments for SMTP?, Yakov Shafranovich
• [Asrg] 2b. New draft of the LMAP Discussion document posted, Yakov Shafranovich
• RE: [Asrg] Re: the e-postage argument, Tom Thomson
• Re: [Asrg] Re: the e-postage argument, mathew
• Re: [Asrg] Re: the e-postage argument, Seth Breidbart
• Re: [Asrg] Usefulness of wholesale blocking of attachments for SMTP?, mathew
• Re: [Asrg] Re: E-postage, Barry Shein
• Re: [Asrg] Re: E-postage, Barry Shein
• Re: [Asrg] Re: not E-postage, Barry Shein
• Apr 21 2004
• Re: [Asrg] Re: E-postage, Matt Sergeant
• Re: [Asrg] Usefulness of wholesale blocking of attachments for SMTP?, Matt Sergeant
• [Asrg] Re: Re: the e-postage argument, John R Levine
• RE: [Asrg] 'Registered Email' and 'Trust-E-mail' proposals for both spam and viruses, Joshua Leisk
• Re: [Asrg] Re: not E-postage, John Levine
• Re: [Asrg] Re: E-postage, Daniel Feenberg
• Re: [Asrg] Re: E-postage, der Mouse
• Re: [Asrg] Re: the e-postage argument, der Mouse
• RE: [Asrg] Re: the e-postage argument, Tom Thomson
• Re: [Asrg] Re: Usefulness of wholesale blocking of attachments for SMTP? (Lane Sharman et al), der Mouse
• [Asrg] Re: the e-postage argument, Barry Shein