Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Main Archive Directory]

Jun 21 2003

Re: [Asrg] "more readable", Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Point of information..., Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] Point of information..., Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] Point of information..., Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Grouped reply on permissions lists, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] "more readable", gep2

Jun 21 2003

RE: [Asrg] "more readable", Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] Re: spam from the "spamfree" message board, WSpringfield
RE: [Asrg] "more readable", Bob Wyman
RE: [Asrg] "more readable", Bob Wyman
[Asrg] spam from the "spamfree" message board, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Bob Wyman
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Bob Wyman
[Asrg] Do end users really use HTML?, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Permission-based antispam-antivirus solutions, John Kodis
Re: [Asrg] "more readable", Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, John Morris
Re: [Asrg] Authentication tokens, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Point of information..., Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Elric Pedder
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Tony Hansen

Jun 20 2003

Re: [Asrg] Point of information..., Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Point of information..., Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Grouped reply on permissions lists, gep2
[Asrg] "more readable", gep2
[Asrg] HTML-burdened E-mail, gep2
[Asrg] Authentication tokens, gep2
Re: [Asrg] Point of information..., Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, John Morris
Re: [Asrg] Point of information..., Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Grouped reply on permissions lists, gep2
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, gep2
Re: [Asrg] Point of information..., Barry Shein
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Bob Wyman
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Evan Harris
Re: [Asrg] Point of information..., Barry Shein
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, gep2
RE: [Asrg] HTML-burdened E-mail, gep2
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Benjamin Geer
Re: [Asrg] HTML-burdened E-mail, gep2
Re: [Asrg] Cutting down spam load, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Mailing list speed, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Cutting down spam load, gep2
Re: [Asrg] Grouped reply on permissions lists, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Grouped reply on permissions lists, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] anti-spam message board, WSpringfield
Re: [Asrg] "Useful features", Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Grouped reply on permissions lists, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Grouped reply on permissions lists, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] "Useful features", gep2
[Asrg] Grouped reply on permissions lists, gep2
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Evan Harris
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Evan Harris
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Evan Harris
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Evan Harris
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Steven F Siirila
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Benjamin Geer
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Bob Wyman
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Scott Nelson
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Evan Harris
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Evan Harris
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Benjamin Geer
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, John Morris
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Bob Wyman
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Bob Wyman
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Evan Harris
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Evan Harris
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Jon Kyme
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Bob Wyman
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] HTML-burdened E-mail, Dr. Jeffrey Race
Re: [Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] HTML-burdened E-mail, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Point of information..., Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Cutting down spam load, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] HTML-burdened E-mail, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] "Useful features", Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] New proposal for spam blocking: Greylisting, Evan Harris
RE: [Asrg] HTML-burdened E-mail, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] HTML-burdened E-mail, Dr. Jeffrey Race
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Steven F Siirila
RE: [Asrg] HTML-burdened E-mail, gep2
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Benjamin Geer
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Cutting down spam load, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] base64 encoded mail, Dave Aronson
Re: [Asrg] Discouraging HTML-burdened E-mail, Dr. Jeffrey Race
Re: [Asrg] base64 encoded mail, Benjamin Geer
Re: [Asrg] Discouraging HTML-burdened E-mail, Benjamin Geer
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Benjamin Geer
Re: [Asrg] HTML-burdened E-mail, gep2
[Asrg] Discouraging HTML-burdened E-mail, gep2
[Asrg] Cutting down spam load, gep2
[Asrg] "Useful features", gep2
Re: [Asrg] HTML-burdened unsolicited mail, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] HTML-burdened unsolicited mail, Dr. Jeffrey Race
Re: [Asrg] HTML-burdened unsolicited mail, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Point of information..., Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] HTML-burdened unsolicited mail, Dr. Jeffrey Race
Re: [Asrg] base64 encoded mail, Tony Hansen
Re: [Asrg] Point of information..., Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Point of information..., Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] HTML-burdened E-mail, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: Reverse DNS, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Permission-based antispam-antivirus solutions, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver

Jun 19 2003

[Asrg] Permission-based antispam-antivirus solutions, gep2
[Asrg] HTML-burdened E-mail, gep2
Re: [Asrg] Reverse DNS, Jim Bauer
[Asrg] base64 encoded mail, gep2
[Asrg] HTML-burdened unsolicited mail, gep2
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, gep2
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Selby Hatch
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Benjamin Geer
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Point of information..., Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: [Asrg] Reverse DNS, gep2
[Asrg] Re: Point of information..., Selby Hatch
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, gep2
[Asrg] Point of information..., Selby Hatch
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, gep2
[Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Selby Hatch
[Asrg] Point of information..., Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Re: Reverse DNS, Selby Hatch
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Benjamin Geer
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Bob Wyman
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Bob Wyman
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Re: Reverse DNS, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Reverse DNS, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] SPF: Objection: spammers will use <>, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Re: Reverse DNS, Selby Hatch
[Asrg] Microsoft files suit against Spammers, Bob Wyman
[Asrg] Re: Reverse DNS, gep2
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric D. Williams

Jun 18 2003

Re: [Asrg] Reverse DNS, Benjamin Geer
RE: [Asrg] Reverse DNS, Jason Steiner
Re: [Asrg] Reverse DNS, Steven F Siirila
[Asrg] Reverse DNS, gep2
[Asrg] Increase in spoofed spam using bogus sender, Eric Dean

Jun 17 2003

[Asrg] SPF and other spam approaches, gep2
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] Reverse DNS requirement, Steven F Siirila
Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF, Scott Nelson
Re: [Asrg] UK public inquiry on spam, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, gep2
Re: [Asrg] SPF: Summary of Objections, Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, gep2
RE: [Asrg] Introduction and another idea, Bob Wyman
Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF, Markus Stumpf
RE: [Asrg] UK public inquiry on spam, Clayton, Nik [IT]
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] SPF: Summary of Objections, Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] SPF: Objection: spammers will use <>, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 9, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] UK public inquiry on spam, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 9, Jon Kyme
[Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 8, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] SPF: Summary of Objections, Scott Nelson
Re: [Asrg] SPF: Summary of Objections, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF, Scott Nelson
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 8, Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 7, Barry Shein

Jun 16 2003

[Asrg] Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Join ASRG and display your email address for the spammers!!, Peter Kay
[Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 9, Jon Kyme
[Asrg] SPF: Summary of Objections, Meng Weng Wong
[Asrg] Re: SPF: Objections 3 and 4, Meng Weng Wong
[Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 6, Meng Weng Wong
Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF, Markus Stumpf
[Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 9, Meng Weng Wong
[Asrg] Re: SPF: Objections 1 and 2, Meng Weng Wong
[Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 7, Meng Weng Wong
[Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 8, Meng Weng Wong
[Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 5, Meng Weng Wong
[Asrg] SPF: Objection: spammers will use <>, Meng Weng Wong
[Asrg] Re: SPF: Summary of Objections, erratum, Meng Weng Wong
RE: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list ), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: [Asrg] Join ASRG and display your email address for the spammers!!, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
[Asrg] Re: CLOSE ASRG NOW IT HAS FAILED, Vern Paxson
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Art Pollard
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Art Pollard
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Bob Wyman
[Asrg] Introduction and another idea, gep2

Jun 15 2003

Re: [Asrg] Join ASRG and display your email address for the spammers!!, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Join ASRG and display your email address for the spammers!!, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] 6.I Spam elimination by mailbox lock and key, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list ), Vern Paxson
Re: [Asrg] 6.I Spam elimination by mailbox lock and key, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] 6.I Spam elimination by mailbox lock and key, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] Join ASRG and display your email address for the spammers!!, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list ), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF, Yakov Shafranovich

Jun 14 2003

RE: [Asrg] 6.I Spam elimination by mailbox lock and key, Bob Wyman
[Asrg] Spammer responses to SPF, Meng Weng Wong
[Asrg] 6.I Spam elimination by mailbox lock and key, Selby Hatch
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, waltdnes
RE: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Barry Shein
RE: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, waltdnes
Re: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list), Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] Join ASRG and display your email address for the spammers!!, Shannon Jacobs

Jun 13 2003

[Asrg] appropriate to meet/present at ISPCON Fall?, Peter Kay
[Asrg] RE: ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list), Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Bob Wyman
RE: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list), Bob Wyman
RE: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list), Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] MailBlocks and ASRG, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Statistical Analysis shows SPF should work Pretty Well, Meng Weng Wong
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Yakov Shafranovich

Jun 12 2003

[Asrg] News Article - Court denies Mailblocks' injunction request, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] good example of ASRG proposal?, Bob Wyman
RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Peter Kay
[Asrg] good example of ASRG proposal?, Peter Kay

Jun 11 2003

Re: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] News Article - Stealing IP address ownership to send spam, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Hotmail used for scripted spam (from SlashDot), Kurt Magnusson
[Asrg] RMX+DMP = SPF: a technical approach, Meng Weng Wong
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., waltdnes
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., waltdnes
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, waltdnes
[Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Bob Wyman
[Asrg] News Article - Testing for humans when SENDING emails, Yakov Shafranovich

Jun 10 2003

[Asrg] List of current anti-spam headers?, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Peter Kay

Jun 09 2003

Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Art Pollard
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Peter Kay
[Asrg] Spam in Action - NYTimes on Iraqi Card Decks, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Rob Cameron
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
Reaching consensus on 'what is spam' (Was RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Aronson
Re: [Asrg] IPR Document Update, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] IPR Document Update, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] IPR Document Update, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] IPR Document Update, Vernon Schryver

Jun 08 2003

[Asrg] IPR Document Update, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric Dean
Re: [Asrg] economics of spam, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, bukys
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric Dean
Re: [Asrg] Forbes Survey of Anti-Spam methods and products, C. Wegrzyn
[Asrg] Re: economics of spam, Shannon Jacobs
[Asrg] Hotmail used for scripted spam (from SlashDot), Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...), Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] Forbes Survey of Anti-Spam methods and products, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., mathew
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver

Jun 07 2003

Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., mathew
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Margie Arbon
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., mathew
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., mathew
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Scott Nelson
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Peter Kay
Re: *Possible Spam *RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: [Asrg] Re: What are your criteria for the end of spam?, Barry Shein

Jun 06 2003

Re: *Possible Spam *RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Barry Shein
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Barry Shein
RE: RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] Re: What are your criteria for the end of spam?, Shannon Jacobs
Re: RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Jon Kyme
[Asrg] Forbes Survey of Anti-Spam methods and products, Bob Wyman
[Asrg] now we're on stage, Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Scott Nelson
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Scott Nelson
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Beadles, Mark A
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric Dean
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric Dean
Re: *Possible Spam *RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Danny Angus
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Vernon Schryver
Re: *Possible Spam *RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, C. Wegrzyn
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Danny Angus
RE: *Possible Spam *RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Danny Angus
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Howard Roth
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Howard Roth
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Tony Hansen
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...)), Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...)), Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...)), Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...)), Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Dave Crocker

Jun 05 2003

Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...)), Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...)), Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] criteria for spam V2 (was: Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...)), Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...), Troy Rollo
Re: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...), Troy Rollo
RE: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what isspam"...), Richard Johnson
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...), Richard Johnson
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Tony Hansen
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
RE: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...), Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Spam as a symptom of sender/recipient imbalance., Jon Kyme
[Asrg] IPR Document updated, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...), Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Aronson
Re: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...), Dave Aronson
Re: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...), Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Bill Cole
Re: [Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what isspam"...), Bill Cole
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., C. Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Dave Aronson
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Dave Aronson
[Asrg] Line Fuzziness (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...), Dave Aronson
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Aronson
[Asrg] Implicit Consent (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...), Dave Aronson
[Asrg] Spam Isn't Just Sleaze (was: Another criteria for "what is spam"...), Dave Aronson
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Tony Hansen
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., kent
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver

Jun 04 2003

Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., kent
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Eric Dean
RE: [Asrg] Spam as a symptom of sender/recipient imbalance., Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric Dean
[Asrg] Spam as a symptom of sender/recipient imbalance., Rob Cameron
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Bill Cole
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Scott Nelson
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Crocker
[Asrg] Spam by industry sector, Matt Sergeant
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Art Pollard
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Bill Cole
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Alberto França
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Aronson
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Aronson
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Dave Crocker
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Eric D. Williams
RE: Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics ( was: RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?)), Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] CRI Header, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Bill Cole
RE: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Peter Kay
Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine

Jun 03 2003

[Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"..., Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, John Fenley
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header [correction], Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Yakov Shafranovich
RE: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work., Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] CRI Header, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] CRI Header, Eric Dean
RE: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work., Eric Dean
Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics, John Fenley
Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Scott Nelson
RE: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work., Peter Kay
RE: Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics ( was: RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?)), Peter Kay
RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
RE: Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics ( was: RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?)), Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
RE: Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics ( was: RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?)), Eric D. Williams
FW: [Asrg] Whitelist conforming definition, Eric D. Williams

Jun 02 2003

RE: Short-term versus Long-term focus: A bit of economics ( was: RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (..."improves" C/R utility?)), Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] RMX: New draft and implementation, Meng Weng Wong
Re: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work., Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidenceof previous work., Harry Tabak
Re: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work., Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence of previous work., Scott Nelson
Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Scott Nelson
[Asrg] Xircom Patent (was TitanKey etc.), Yakov Shafranovich
[Asrg] Re: Tracking patent claims - please also track evidence ofprevious work., Yakov Shafranovich

Mail converted by MHonArc