Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Date Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index]
[IETF Main Archive Directory]
- Jun 01 2003
- May 31 2003
- RE: [Asrg] The level of discourse has degenerated... It ain't useful., Paul Judge
- Re: [Asrg] Need to know, Steven F Siirila
- Re: [Asrg] Need to know, Scott Nelson
- RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Scott Nelson
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Bob Wyman
- Re: [Asrg] IP cross post (interesting RMX reception...), Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), waltdnes
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
- [Asrg] IP cross post (interesting RMX reception...), Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), kent
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Chris Lewis
- RE: [Asrg] Re: Brad Templeton's C/R Guidelines, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
- May 30 2003
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors"improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
- RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Jon Kyme
- RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in theHouse of Representative), Kee Hinckley
- [Asrg] The level of discourse has degenerated... It ain't useful., Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Vern Paxson
- Re: [Asrg] Choicelist, John Fenley
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Scott Nelson
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
- [Asrg] 3. Volunteers to work on Requirements, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric D. Williams
- RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Eric D. Williams
- RE: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric Dean
- May 29 2003
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Bob Wyman
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
- [Asrg] Re: Brad Templeton's C/R Guidelines, Jason R. Mastaler
- [Asrg] Re: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors"improves" C/R utility?), Jason R. Mastaler
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Re: Brad Templeton's C/R Guidelines, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), waltdnes
- RE: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Bob Wyman
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- RE: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
- Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Bob Wyman
- Re: [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Richard Rognlie
- [Asrg] RE: TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Peter Kay
- [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?), Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Peter Kay
- RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Bob Wyman
- Re: [Asrg] Choicelist, Jamie Lawrence
- [Asrg] Re: Brad Templeton's C/R Guidelines, Jason R. Mastaler
- May 28 2003
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] Choicelist, John Fenley
- Re: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, mathew
- Re: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, David Wheeler
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Jed Margolin
- [Asrg] Standard headers for anti-spam systems, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] News Article - ASRG Slashdotted, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Patents and ASRG (was (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents), Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, Paul Judge
- May 27 2003
- [Asrg] (Position): Successful anti-spam techniques must avoid software patents, David Wheeler
- [Asrg] Challenge-response issues and solutions: see "Guarded Email" paper., David Wheeler
- Re: [Asrg] Need to know, Markus Stumpf
- [Asrg] News Article - C/R systems and mailing lists, Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] Brad Templeton's C/R Guidelines, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Tom Thomson
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Eric Dean
- [Asrg] Re: What are your criteria for the end of spam?, Rodney Tillotson
- Re: [Asrg] Need to know, Scott Nelson
- Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Vernon Schryver
- Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in theHouse of Representative), Kee Hinckley
- Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Vernon Schryver
- Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in theHouse of Representative), Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Ken Hirsch
- Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Kee Hinckley
- Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Markus Stumpf
- Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Vernon Schryver
- May 26 2003
- Re: [Asrg] Need to know, Markus Stumpf
- Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in theHouse of Representative), Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Terri Oda
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Pay-for-attention (Was Re: article on spam), Mitch Wagner
- Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Vernon Schryver
- Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in theHouse of Representative), Kee Hinckley
- [Asrg] Re: Pay-for-attention (Was Re: article on spam), Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] The combination of legislation and technology (was: Articl e - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), mathew
- Re: ADV: (was Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), mathew
- [Asrg] Re: Pay-for-attention (Was Re: article on spam), mathew
- Re: [Asrg] What are your criteria for the end of spam?, David Cheatham
- May 25 2003
- May 24 2003
- May 23 2003
- RE: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- RE: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House ofRepresentative, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, C. Wegrzyn
- RE: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction, Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Kee Hinckley
- [Asrg] The combination of legislation and technology (was: Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative), Paul Judge
- RE: [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yet another] article on spam), Paul Judge
- Re: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Richard Rognlie
- RE: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Paul Judge
- Re: [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Karl Kraft
- [Asrg] Article - New anti-spam proposal in the House of Representative, Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] Economic methods for controlling spam (was [Yet another]article on spam), Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction (was RE: Som e data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses), Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, wayne
- [Asrg] This mail list has been hacked, Jed Margolin
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam, mathew
- Re: [Asrg] [Yet another] article on spam, Shannon Jacobs
- May 22 2003
- May 21 2003
- Re: [Asrg] ACK4, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] ACK4, scott
- Re: [Asrg] ACK4, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction (was RE: Som e data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses), Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] ACK4, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] ACK4, Vernon Schryver
- Re: This is a research group not a standards group (was RE: [Asrg] Sh annon Jacob's article on spam), Yakov Shafranovich
- This is a research group not a standards group (was RE: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam), Paul Judge
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Justin Mason
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] ACK4, Scott Nelson
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Tom Thomson
- [Asrg] SHOULD filtering be done as part of SMTP transaction (was RE: Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses), Paul Judge
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- Re: RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Clayton, Nik [IT]
- Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Shannon Jacobs
- Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Clayton, Nik [IT]
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Shannon Jacobs
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Tom Thomson
- Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Tom Thomson
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Clayton, Nik [IT]
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Richard Rognlie
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- May 20 2003
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- [Asrg] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-crocker-spam-techconsider-01.txt, Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Tom Thomson
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Michael Rubel
- [Asrg] MailFrontier and Patents, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- RE: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric Dean
- [Asrg] Jay-Random subject line, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Jeffrey Race
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, waltdnes
- May 19 2003
- Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Jeffrey Race
- RE: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Eric Dean
- [Asrg] Re: C/R - What people say, Jason R. Mastaler
- Re: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Justin Mason
- Re: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Larry Marks
- RE: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Daniel Feenberg
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Barry Shein
- [Asrg] types of spammers (was: ASRG as a source of spam?), Paul Judge
- RE: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Shannon Jacobs
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Larry Marks
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] News Article - MailBlocks, Patents and Prior Art, Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] News Article - MailBlocks, Patents and Prior Art, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Asrg] C/R Interworking Framework, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Eric Dean
- [Asrg] News Article - MailBlocks, Patents and Prior Art, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- [Asrg] Could/Should/Must law require mechanism?, Bob Wyman
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Scott Nelson
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Scott Nelson
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Michael Rubel
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- May 18 2003
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] Shannon Jacob's article on spam, Chui Tey
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Scott Nelson
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] List Detection, Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Fred Bacon
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Eric Dean
- [Asrg] ASRG as a source of spam?, Shannon Jacobs
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Jon Kyme
- [Asrg] Some data on the validity of MAIL FROM addresses, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Kee Hinckley
- May 17 2003
- Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam, Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Kee Hinckley
- May 16 2003
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Steve Atkins
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Paul Judge
- RE: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Paul Judge
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Steve Atkins
- RE: [Asrg] RE: C/R Framework, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Steve Atkins
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, mathew
- Re: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, mathew
- Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam, mathew
- Re: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, mathew
- May 15 2003
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Daniel Feenberg
- [Asrg] News Article - FTC targeting open relays, Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] Bruce Schneier on unique email addresses..., Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam, Barry Shein
- Re: RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Spam is good?, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Spam is good?, Steve Atkins
- Re: RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] RE: C/R Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] Spam is good?, Roy S. Walker
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Eric Dean
- [Asrg] RE: C/R Framework, Eric Dean
- RE: RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Vernon Schryver
- Re: RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Jon Kyme
- [Asrg] News Article - Blacklists vs. Spam, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Framework, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam, Tom Bartel
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Vernon Schryver
- [Asrg] C/R Framework, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam, Barry Shein
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Eric Dean
- May 14 2003
- [Asrg] Removing the incentive to spam, Chui Tey
- Re: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Tom Thomson
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Eric S. Johansson
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Eric S. Johansson
- RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX, Tom Thomson
- RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX, Tom Thomson
- Re: [Asrg] List Detection, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] List Detection, Scott Nelson
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Eric S. Johansson
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Vernon Schryver
- May 13 2003
- Re: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Dave Crocker
- RE: [Asrg] Suggested reply?, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Suggested reply?, Bob Wyman
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Eric Dean
- [Asrg] C/R - What people say, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER etc., Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX, Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] Suggested reply?, Sauer, Damon
- [Asrg] ASRG Website, Paul Judge
- RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX, Vernon Schryver
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article, Tom Thomson
- RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation, Tom Thomson
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX, Michael Rubel
- RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article, Tom Thomson
- [Asrg] RE: camram/sender pays e-mail system, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] Re: camram/sender pays e-mail system, Eric S. Johansson
- RE: [Asrg] List Detection, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Vernon Schryver
- [Asrg] RE: camram/sender pays e-mail system, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] List Detection, Matt Sergeant
- RE: [Asrg] Does the group have a future?, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Eric Dean
- [Asrg] Crypto-based alternative to RMX, Tom Thomson
- RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure, Eric D. Williams
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- RE: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER etc., Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Jon Kyme
- RE: [Asrg] camram/sender pays e-mail system, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] re: RFC 2076 and spam, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Does the group have a future?, Paul Judge
- RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure, Tom Thomson
- [Asrg] List Detection, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Does the group have a future?, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER etc., Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- RE: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER etc., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Vernon Schryver
- RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure, william
- RE: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure, Tom Thomson
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Jon Kyme
- [Asrg] Does the group have a future?, Tom Thomson
- RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] C/R patents, Yakov Shafranovich
- May 12 2003
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [Asrg] C/R patents, Craig Cockburn
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER, Troy Rollo
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER, Art Pollard
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Richard Rognlie
- Re: [Asrg] C/R patents, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R patents, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [Asrg] Re: News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER - text included, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [Asrg] re: RFC 2076 and spam, Jacob Palme
- RE: [Asrg] C/R patents, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] Re: News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER - textincluded, Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER etc., Barry Shein
- [Asrg] camram/sender pays e-mail system, Eric S. Johansson
- [Asrg] C/R patents, Jed Margolin
- [Asrg] re: Using precedence and priority headers to mark spam, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] C/R patents, Art Pollard
- Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- [Asrg] C/R Statistics, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?, Eric D. Williams
- RE: Fwd: [Asrg] How many legitimate SMTP servers?, Tom Thomson
- Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- RE: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?, Eric D. Williams
- RE: [Asrg] C/R patents, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] C/R patents, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] C/R patents, Yakov Shafranovich
- May 11 2003
- Re: [Asrg] C/R patents, Scott Nelson
- [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1, Eric Dean
- RE: [Asrg] C/R patents, Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER etc., Vernon Schryver
- [Asrg] C/R patents, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Re: News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER - textincluded, Tony Hansen
- Re: [Asrg] Willfull and intentional misunderstandings, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Seeking volunteers for C/R documents (was: Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for ), Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] Re: News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER - textincluded, Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] News Article - CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER SPAMMER, Yakov Shafranovich
- RE: [Asrg] Seeking volunteers for C/R documents (was: Washington Post:Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for ), John Fenley
- Re: [Asrg] Seeking volunteers for C/R documentrs, Scott Nelson
- RE: [Asrg] Call to Arms: Securing E-Mail, Controlling Spam, Empowering Users (fwd), Eric Dean
- Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Mail converted by MHonArc