Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Date Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index]
[IETF Main Archive Directory]
- Dec 17 2003
- Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Markus Stumpf
- Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: LMAP - Forwarding Comment and Recommended Changes, Mark E. Mallett
- Re: [Asrg] 1. Inventory of Problems - SMTP, Markus Stumpf
- Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Dave Crocker
- Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labelling (?), Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] 1. Inventory of Problems - SMTP, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labelling (?), mathew
- Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, J C Lawrence
- Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, mathew
- [Asrg] 0. General - SpamAssasin deployed on IETF servers, Yakov Shafranovich
- [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals - C/R and CRI, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Philip Miller
- 6. Proposals - C/R and CRI (was: Re: [Asrg] 6. General - IPR - Patentson C/R), Philip Miller
- Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] 1. Inventory of Problems - SMTP, Markus Stumpf
- Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals: MTA MARK vs port 25 filtering?, Markus Stumpf
- Dec 16 2003
Mail converted by MHonArc