Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Main Archive Directory]

Apr 06 2003

Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam), Brad Spencer
Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...), Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, J C Lawrence
RE: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...), J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] Automated responses strike again, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, J C Lawrence
Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam), Brad Spencer
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, wayne
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., wayne
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...), wayne
Re: [Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...), Vernon Schryver

Apr 06 2003

Re: [Asrg] ASRG meeting minutes, Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Daniel Feenberg
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, waltdnes
[Asrg] Whitelisting on Message-ID (Was Turing Test ...), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, waltdnes
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Art Pollard
Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] define spam, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., wayne
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, James Wilde
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] 4.a Taxonomy -- Where would CHANNELS fit into the Taxonomy ?, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Chuq Von Rospach
[Asrg] 4.a Taxonomy -- Where would CHANNELS fit into the Taxonomy ?, Russell-2asrg44all-
[Asrg] two notes that went "down the wrong pipe", Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., wayne
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] 4.a. Taxonomy changes (was: Taxonomy and List of Requireme nts), Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam), Brad Spencer
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Daniel Feenberg
RE: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Opt-In (Was Re: [Asrg] Proposal for Opt-Out), Richard Johnson
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] 4.a. Taxonomy changes (was: Taxonomy and List of Requireme nts), Alan DeKok
[Asrg] Ban the bounce; improved challenge-response systems, waltdnes

Apr 05 2003

[Asrg] 4.a. Taxonomy changes (was: Taxonomy and List of Requirements), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
Re: RE: [Asrg] define spam, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), Kee Hinckley
Re: Opt-In (Was Re: [Asrg] Proposal for Opt-Out), J C Lawrence

Apr 04 2003

Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), mathew
Re: Opt-In (Was Re: [Asrg] Proposal for Opt-Out), Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] Dream system- Nirvana or Nightmare?, Sauer, Damon
Re: RE: [Asrg] define spam, Jon Kyme
Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam), Brad Spencer
Re: [Asrg] Consent, Brad Spencer
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Consent, Kee Hinckley
Re: Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
Re: Opt-In (Was Re: [Asrg] Proposal for Opt-Out), Jeff Macdonald
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Nickle, Michael
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Brad Spencer
RE: [Asrg] define spam, matthew richards
RE: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] Consent, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] define spam, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Consent, matthew richards
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Chuq Von Rospach
[Asrg] honey smoked "ham" <i>is</i> ridiculous, matthew richards
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Brad Spencer
Relay honeypots (RE: [Asrg] define spam), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Brad Spencer
RE: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics, Tom Thomson
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy and List of Requirements, Brad Spencer
RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy and List of Requirements, Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Brad Spencer
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Consent, Troy Rollo
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] define spam, william
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Jon Kyme
Re: RE: [Asrg] define spam, Brad Spencer
Classification of solutions and which ones do real-time check (wasRe: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures), william
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] define spam, william
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Jon Kyme
Re: RE: [Asrg] define spam, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] define spam, william
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] define spam, waltdnes
Re: [Asrg] It's not spam, it's ooga-booga... Was: 5c. Message Status, waltdnes
Re: [Asrg] define spam, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] define spam, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), mathew
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Consent, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Consent, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Apr 03 2003

RE: [Asrg] define spam, Brad Spencer
Re: [Asrg] Consent, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Brad Spencer
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Brad Spencer
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Chuq Von Rospach
RE: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] "ham" <i>is</i> ridiculous, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Markus Stumpf
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] spamstones, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Consent, matthew richards
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Brad Spencer
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, Justin Mason
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Consent, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] It's not spam, it's ooga-booga... Was: 5c. MessageStatus, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, william
Re: [Asrg] where is the current draft of the taxonomy, william
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, J C Lawrence
[Asrg] where is the current draft of the taxonomy, Russell-2asrg44all-
[Asrg] Taxoonomy and List of Requirements, Brad Spencer
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, Justin Mason
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, Justin Mason
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, william
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, J C Lawrence
[Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates, matthew richards
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., J C Lawrence
[Asrg] "ham" <i>is</i> ridiculous, matthew richards
RE: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, Bob Atkinson
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., matthew richards
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Chuq Von Rospach
RE: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] Indescriminate WANTED spam, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] Indescriminate WANTED spam, Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Chuq Von Rospach
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Matt Sergeant
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., william
RE: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] Re: "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] Re: "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive, Matt Sergeant
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Indescriminate WANTED spam, Markus Stumpf
RE: [Asrg] Email Address Verification Notes (fwd), Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., william
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] Re: "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive, Brad Spencer
[Asrg] Indescriminate WANTED spam, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] Re: "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] Re: "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] "ham" is ridiculous -was- Re: False Positive, Jim Youll
Re: False Positive -was- RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates, Markus Stumpf
RE: [Asrg] Email Address Verification Notes (fwd), william
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, william
Re: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Art Pollard
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Art Pollard
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Claus Assmann
RE: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Art Pollard
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, Justin Mason
Re: [Asrg] Turing Test ..., Claus Assmann
Re: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, Bob Atkinson
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, J C Lawrence
RE: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, Bob Atkinson
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, Justin Mason
RE: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, william
Re: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics, Clifton Royston
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), waltdnes

Apr 02 2003

Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] Email Address Verification Notes (fwd), Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, Bob Atkinson
Spam costs. RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), mathew
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Mark Delany
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, william
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, william
Re: [Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Eric Imsand
[Asrg] Turing Test ..., Art Pollard
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates, Eric S. Imsand
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Eric S. Imsand
Re: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] porkhash: flexible anti-impersonation mail signatures, Justin Mason
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Markus Stumpf
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Eric S. Imsand
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Eric S. Imsand
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Steven F Siirila
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, william
RE: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Daniel Feenberg
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Steven F Siirila
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Steven F Siirila
RE: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Kee Hinckley
Re: False Positive -was- RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: seetranscript for details, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] 2.0 Metrics (Was Re: [Asrg] spamstones), Clifton Royston
Re: False Positive -was- RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Clifton Royston
[Asrg] 2.0 Metrics (Was Re: [Asrg] spamstones), Clifton Royston
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] ASRG meeting minutes, Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Steven F Siirila
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Daniel Feenberg
RE: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Markus Stumpf
[Asrg] Honeypots, Brad Spencer
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Eric S. Imsand
Re: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Markus Stumpf
[Asrg] Email Address Verification Notes (fwd), william
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), Chuq Von Rospach
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Bob Atkinson
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), Kaitlin Duck Sherwood
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Bob Atkinson
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Eric D. Williams
RE: 3. Volunteers to work on Requirements (was RE: [Asrg] voting?), william
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, william
RE: [Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] 6. Proposal for new solutions: Next gen email system requests/ideas, Paul Judge
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] whitelisting server and not users, Markus Stumpf
RE: 3. Volunteers to work on Requirements (was RE: [Asrg] voting?), Eric D. Williams
RE: 3. Volunteers to work on Requirements (was RE: [Asrg] voting?), Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates, william
Re: [Asrg] FW: Next gen email system requests/ideas, Dave Crocker
[Asrg] RE:ASGR 8a Use of certificates, Tom Thomson
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] FW: Next gen email system requests/ideas, Jason Hihn
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Vernon Schryver
3. Volunteers to work on Requirements (was RE: [Asrg] voting?), Paul Judge
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Jason Hihn
Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Eric S. Imsand
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Eric S. Imsand
RE: [Asrg] Rejecting Email, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] SMTP over SSL, Bob Atkinson
RE: [Asrg] Rejecting Email, Bob Atkinson
RE: [Asrg] voting?, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Apr 01 2003

Re: [Asrg] spamstones, Justin Mason
RE: [Asrg] voting?, Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, mathew
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), mathew
Re: [Asrg] spamstones, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] spamstones, Liudvikas Bukys
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Jason Hihn
Re: [Asrg] spamstones, Justin Mason
[Asrg] voting?, matthew richards
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] spamstones, bukys
Re: False Positive -was- RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Liudvikas Bukys
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, william
Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Justin Mason
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] spamstones, Justin Mason
RE: [Asrg] spamstones, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Chuq Von Rospach
[Asrg] off topic, but hauntingly relevant..., Chuq Von Rospach
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Jason Hihn
Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, wayne
[Asrg] spamstones, Dave Crocker
RE: [Asrg] Rejecting Email, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] Rejecting Email, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] Rejecting Email, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, william
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Jason Hihn
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, wayne
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, mathew
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), mathew
Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] March spam ratio, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] RFC3514 -> Evil Header (note: consider this first email for april), Matthew Goddard
[Asrg] RFC3514 -> Evil Header (note: consider this first email for april), william
Re: [Asrg] Rejecting Email, Steven F Siirila
Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Rejecting Email, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Art Pollard
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Brad Templeton
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), mathew
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] email pull (was RE: Authentication ), mathew
False Positive -was- RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Tom Bartel
[Asrg] Terminology..., Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, wayne
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, wayne
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, J C Lawrence
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Justin Mason
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Vernon Schryver

Mar 31 2003

Re: [Asrg] define spam, Brad Templeton
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Chuq Von Rospach
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Jason Hihn
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Chuq Von Rospach
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Jason Hihn
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Chuq Von Rospach
Envelope-From Authentication (Was Re: [Asrg] Admin: Tim Smith isTRYING to be unsubscribed - someone take care of this?), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Justin Mason
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Jason Hihn
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Sauer, Damon
RE: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Jason Hihn
Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Alan DeKok
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Jason Hihn
[Asrg] Is this a new spam form?, Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Markus Stumpf
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Markus Stumpf
[Asrg] Re: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #145 - 8 msgs, Tony Preston
RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Dave Crocker
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Jason Hihn
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] March spam ratio, Dave Crocker
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Jason Hihn
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Chuq Von Rospach
RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Eric D. Williams
RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Justin Mason
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Jason Hihn
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, David F. Skoll
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, David F. Skoll
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Jason Hihn
Re: [Asrg] define spam, wayne
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Jason Hihn
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Rejecting Email, Steven F Siirila
Re: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, wayne
RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] March spam ratio, Markus Stumpf
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Eric D. Williams
RE: RE: RE: [Asrg] define spam, Eric D. Williams
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Markus Stumpf
[Asrg] How to defeat spam that uses encryption?, Jason Hihn
Re: [Asrg] cost vs. benefit, Steven F Siirila
Re: [Asrg] March spam ratio, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, wayne
Re: [Asrg] March spam ratio, Dave Crocker
[Asrg] March spam ratio, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Re: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #133 - 14 msgs, Markus Stumpf
[Asrg] Admin: Tim Smith is TRYING to be unsubscribed - someone take careof this?, Jim Youll
Re: RE: RE: [Asrg] define spam, Jon Kyme
Re: RE: [Asrg] Consent, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] define spam, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Consent, wayne
[Asrg] 5.b NODE Opt-whatever idea, waltdnes

Mail converted by MHonArc