Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Main Archive Directory]

Mar 25 2003

Re: [Asrg] Certs required to send mail, Brad Templeton
Re: [Asrg] FC: Will new "spam reduction" service result in... more spam?, Brad Templeton
Re: [Asrg] Protocols, Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] Certs required to send mail, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Certs required to send mail, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Certs required to send mail, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Certs required to send mail, Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] Certs required to send mail, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Certs required to send mail, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Sauer, Damon
Re: [Asrg] FC: Will new "spam reduction" service result in... more spam?, Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] Certs required to send mail, Jon Kyme
5.c. message status - Failure Modes (was RE: [Asrg] Protocols), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] Certs required to send mail, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] a "baby steps" proposal., Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] a "baby steps" proposal., Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] RE: My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] FC: Will new "spam reduction" service result in...more spam?, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] Protocols, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] a "baby steps" proposal., Mark Delany
Re: [Asrg] Certs required to send mail ?(Was: My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly! )), Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] a "baby steps" proposal., Daniel Feenberg
Re: 5b. Opt-Out - Re: [Asrg] ASRG work items, william
Re: [Asrg] RE: My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it wentbadly!), william
[Asrg] a "baby steps" proposal., Chuq Von Rospach
Re: 5b. Opt-Out - Re: [Asrg] ASRG work items, Brad Templeton
[Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Scott A Crosby
[Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Kee Hinckley
5c. Message Status - Re: [Asrg] ASRG work items, william
[Asrg] Re: Not again - another challenge/response patent (Prior art), David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] ASRG work items, william
Re: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly! ), Dave Crocker
[Asrg] RE: My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] Hashstamp-like proposal, David Finnie
Re: [Asrg] FC: Will new "spam reduction" service result in... more spam?, Brad Templeton
Re: [Asrg] ASRG work items, william
5b. Opt-Out - Re: [Asrg] ASRG work items, william
[Asrg] ASRG work items, Paul Judge
[Asrg] Profile of a spammer, Curtis, Jonathan
[Asrg] FC: Will new "spam reduction" service result in... more spam?, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] Not again - another challenge/response patent, David Anderson

Mar 24 2003

Re: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] keeping it accurate, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] keeping it accurate, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Not again - another challenge/response patent, Brad Templeton
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Dave Crocker
[Asrg] Not again - another challenge/response patent, jm
Re: [Asrg] Hashstamp-like proposal, Brad Templeton
Re: [Asrg] Hashstamp-like proposal, Brad Templeton
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Alan DeKok
[RANT][RE: [Asrg] Hashstamp-like proposal, Sauer, Damon
Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Valdis . Kletnieks
RE: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Sauer, Damon
Re: [Asrg] Hashstamp-like proposal, meor
Re: [Asrg] Hashstamp-like proposal, meor
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Ted Gavin
RE: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] keeping it accurate, Matt Sergeant
[Asrg] Statistics, David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Alan DeKok
RE: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, David Walker
RE: rant.. Re: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] keeping it accurate, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, Daniel Feenberg
Re: [Asrg] Hashstamp-like proposal, David Finnie
Re: [Asrg] keeping it accurate, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Hashstamp-like proposal, Jon Kyme
[Asrg] Hashstamp-like proposal, meor
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, David Walker
[Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Scott A Crosby
Re: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, william
Re: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, Chuq Von Rospach
RE: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, Gordon Fecyk - Home
Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Steve Schear
[Asrg] Anybody interested in joining me on a VoIP spam session, Apr 2, San Jose, Brad Templeton
Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), David Finnie
Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), David Finnie
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-usercontrol, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, william
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, william
Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Jamie Lawrence

Mar 23 2003

RE: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, william
[Asrg] Requirements for gathering statistics, Alan DeKok
Re: Parameters for success? (was Re: [Asrg] Re: [OffTopic - NNTP], Justin Mason
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Kee Hinckley
Re: rant.. Re: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Vernon Schryver
Parameters for success? (was Re: [Asrg] Re: [OffTopic - NNTP], Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] keeping it accurate, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, william
[Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, william
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, william
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, william
Re: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Ted Gavin
Re: [Asrg] Eye for an eye: DDoS against spammers, william
[Asrg] "How do you justify your job?", Gordon Fecyk - Home
Re: [Asrg] Misunderstandings ..., william
rant.. Re: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, william
Re: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Alan DeKok
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] keeping it accurate, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Scott A Crosby
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-usercontrol, Tony Finch
[Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Scott A Crosby
Re: [Asrg] Re: [OffTopic - NNTP], Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, Matt Sergeant
[Asrg] keeping it accurate, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] A meta-comment on sending mail in this forum, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-usercontrol, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-usercontrol, Kee Hinckley
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-usercontrol, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-usercontrol, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] Re: [OffTopic - NNTP], Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Eye for an eye: DDoS against spammers, Kee Hinckley
Re: [MLIST] Re: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, David Walker
Re: [Asrg] Re: Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Steve Schear
RE: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, Gordon Fecyk - Home
RE: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, Gordon Fecyk - Home
Re: [Asrg] Re: [OffTopic - NNTP], Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] rDNS revisited, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, mathew
[Asrg] Re: [OffTopic - NNTP], mathew
[Asrg] Prank phone calls (was Re: Stamping), mathew
Re: [Asrg] Quotation, mathew
Re: [Asrg] Misunderstandings ..., mathew
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, mathew
[Asrg] Eye for an eye: DDoS against spammers, Dave Lampert
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, william
Re: [Asrg] Re: Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, Matt Sergeant
Re: RE: [Asrg] ISPs, Jon Kyme
Re: RE: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly! ), Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), william
RE: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, Dr. Jeffrey Race
Re: [Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, william
[Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Scott A Crosby
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, william
[No Cyber-Nonsense Thanks] RE: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Gordon Fecyk - Home
Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Steve Schear
RE: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-usercontrol, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-usercontrol, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Re: Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Steve Schear
RE: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Steve Schear
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] If You Don't Fix It, The Politicians Will, Michael C. Berch
Re: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, william
[Asrg] Re: Sender pays vs Forgeries, Scott A Crosby
RE: [Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, asrg
Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Vernon Schryver

Mar 22 2003

[Asrg] The "Human-Shield" effect; the need for end-user control, Walter Dnes
Re: [Asrg] If You Don't Fix It, The Politicians Will, Matt Sergeant
[Asrg] If You Don't Fix It, The Politicians Will, Jed Margolin
RE: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly! ), Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly! ), Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] Update to DS Protocol draft, Gordon Fecyk - Home
[OffTopic - NNTP] RE: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re:Stamping), Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] Re: Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Damien Morton
[Asrg] Re: Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Scott A Crosby
[Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Scott A Crosby
[Asrg] [Slightly OT] - From: authentication, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Scott A Crosby
Re: [Asrg] ISPs (correction - sorry), Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] ISPs, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Vernon Schryver
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Blacklist metrics FYI, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] Re: My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Vern Paxson
Re: [Asrg] Answers to the questions on PKI etc, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] follow up (to last post), Dave Lampert
RE: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly! ), Jim Youll
RE: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping, Steve Schear

Mar 21 2003

[Asrg] Re: Stamping, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] follow up (to last post), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping, wayne
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Daniel Feenberg
[Asrg] Re: Stamping, Scott A Crosby
[Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Scott A Crosby
[Asrg] follow up (to last post), matthew richards
[Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Adam Back
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, David Walker
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] Re: Stamping, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Valdis . Kletnieks
[Asrg] Re: "HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: Stamping), Scott A Crosby
"HashStamp" == hashcash? (Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping), Adam Back
RE: [Asrg] ISPs, asrg
Re: [Asrg] ISPs, C Wegrzyn
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping, Kee Hinckley
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, David Walker
RE: [Asrg] Scrambled headers?, Sauer, Damon
RE: [Asrg] Scrambled headers?, Sauer, Damon
Re: [Asrg] Scrambled headers?, Frank de Lange
[Asrg] Re: Stamping, Scott A Crosby
[Asrg] ISPs, asrg
Re: [Asrg] Scrambled headers?, Chuq Von Rospach
RE: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, asrg
Re: [Asrg] As seen on /. : IBM Researcher Offers an E-Stamp SpamSolution, Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] Scrambled headers?, Fred Baker
Re: [Asrg] As seen on /. : IBM Researcher Offers an E-Stamp Spam Solution, Justin Mason
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping, C Wegrzyn
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, David Walker
Re: [Asrg] A possible way to a solution?, David Walker
Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping, C Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] rDNS revisited, Valdis . Kletnieks
[Asrg] Scrambled headers?, Rob
Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] A possible way to a solution?, Dave Crocker
[Asrg] rDNS revisited, M Wild
Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping, Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping, Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] Quotation, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] As seen on /. : IBM Researcher Offers an E-Stamp Spam Solution, Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] Re: Stamping, C Wegrzyn
Re: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly! ), Valdis . Kletnieks
[Asrg] Re: Stamping, Scott A Crosby
RE: [Asrg] Re: Stamping, Damien Morton
Re: [Asrg] A possible way to a solution?, David Walker
[Asrg] Re: Stamping, Scott A Crosby
Re: [Asrg] Stamping, David Finnie
Re: [Asrg] A possible way to a solution?, william
[Asrg] Authentication/Verification - really two parts, william
RE: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), william
RE: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), william
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Claus Färber
Re: [Asrg] A possible way to a solution?, Olger Diekstra
Re: [Asrg] Quotation, Justin Mason
[Asrg] First few links to studies, Frank de Lange
RE: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Dave Crocker
Re: [Asrg] Text of my slides, Bob Wyman
[Asrg] Quotation, Hadmut Danisch
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Tony Finch
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Tony Finch
Re: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Marshall Rose
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Tony Finch
Re: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] presentation slides?, John Morris
[Asrg] Misunderstandings ..., Ye Olde Curmdudgeon
Re: [Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), Hadmut Danisch
[Asrg] My Opinion regarding ietf asrg session (it went badly!), william
Re: [Asrg] A possible way to a solution?, Justin Mason
Re: [Asrg] A possible way to a solution?, Alan DeKok

Mar 20 2003

Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Claus Färber
Re: [Asrg] Blacklist metrics FYI, Justin Mason
Re: [Asrg] Testing content filters, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Spam vs. fax laws, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Blacklist metrics FYI, Justin Mason
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Chris Lewis
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, David Walker
Re: [Asrg] Blacklist metrics FYI, Steven F Siirila
Re: [Asrg] Blacklist metrics FYI, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Blacklist metrics FYI, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Spam vs. fax laws, wayne
Re: Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Valdis . Kletnieks
Bounces, was Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Tony Finch
Re: [Asrg] Blacklist metrics FYI, Justin Mason
[Asrg] presentation slides?, Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Steve Schear
[Asrg] Text of my slides, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Matt Sergeant
[Asrg] Blacklist metrics FYI, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Adam Back
[Asrg] Spam vs. fax laws, Alan DeKok
[Asrg] Answers to the questions on PKI etc, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Re: Tragedy of the Commons, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Tony Finch
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Hadmut Danisch
[Asrg] Wsanted: pointers to scientific research into the spam problem, Frank de Lange
[Asrg] Sender pays vs Forgeries, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] List Kiddies, Justin Mason
[Asrg] Re: Tragedy of the Commons, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] List Kiddies, Justin Mason
Re: [Asrg] Re: Tragedy of the Commons, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] List Kiddies, Alan DeKok
[Asrg] Stamping, Scott A Crosby
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems version 3, Jon Kyme
RE: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] List Kiddies, Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] A method to eliminate spam, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] A method to eliminate spam, Chris Lewis
re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, M Wild
Re: [Asrg] Re: Tragedy of the Commons, halloran parry
[Asrg] Re: Tragedy of the Commons, Scott A Crosby
Re: [Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, Matt Sergeant
RE: [Asrg] This research group will fail, william
Re: [Asrg] A possible way to a solution?, william
[Asrg] A possible way to a solution?, Olger Diekstra
[Asrg] List Kiddies, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, John Morris
RE: [Asrg] This research group will fail, tcleary2
[Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems version 3, Paul Judge
RE: [Asrg] Tragedy of the Commons, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] Mail path verification presentation, william
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Ian Wilson
RE: [Asrg] This research group will fail, tcleary2
Re: [Asrg] Mail path verification presentation, Justin Mason
RE: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] Re: Mail path verification presentation, william
Re: [Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Tragedy of the Commons, Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Frank de Lange
[Asrg] Mail path verification presentation, william
Re: [Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, wayne
RE: [Asrg] Tragedy of the Commons, asrg
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, David Finnie
Re: [Asrg] Tragedy of the Commons, Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] Just when you thought it was safe...., John Morris
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Justin Mason

Mar 19 2003

Re: [Asrg] SMTP & NNTP ?, Claus Färber
RE: [Asrg] Tragedy of the Commons, asrg
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Ian Wilson
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] changing from addresses, Valdis . Kletnieks
[Asrg] changing from addresses, lstewart
RE: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] A method to eliminate spam, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] Tragedy of the Commons, Frank de Lange
RE: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, asrg
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Pierre BRUA
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] A method to eliminate spam, Ronald F. Guilmette
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Valdis . Kletnieks
RE: [Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, asrg
[Asrg] Tragedy of the Commons, mike . pearson
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Amend the RFC to require reverse DNS, Justin Mason
RE: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Requirements to solutions, Matt Sergeant
RE: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, asrg
RE: [Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, asrg
[Asrg] Just when you thought it was safe...., Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] SMTP & NNTP ?, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] A method to eliminate spam, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Matt Sergeant
[Asrg] Re: This research group will fail, David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] A method to eliminate spam, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] Requirements to solutions, Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Alan DeKok
RE: [Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, asrg
RE: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Frank de Lange
[Asrg] Requirements for anti-spam systems-Draft 1, Paul Judge
RE: [Asrg] Requirements to solutions, Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] Requirements to solutions, Chuq Von Rospach
RE: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Requirements to solutions, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, Alan DeKok
RE: [Asrg] Spam cannot be solved at the source, asrg
Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam idea, Lee Murach
RE: [Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, asrg
[Asrg] Requirements to solutions, Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] Amend the RFC to require reverse DNS, John Johnson
RE: [Asrg] This research group will fail, asrg
Re: [Asrg] Amend the RFC to require reverse DNS, Steven F Siirila
Re: [Asrg] Testing content filters, Matt Sergeant
[Asrg] Agenda for ASRG meeting, Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] Amend the RFC to require reverse DNS, Justin Mason
Re: [Asrg] SMTP & NNTP ?, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] This research group will fail, Valdis . Kletnieks
[Asrg] unsubscribe 419234, Pierre Fortin
RE: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] A method to eliminate spam, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Testing content filters, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] This research group will fail, Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] SMTP & NNTP ?, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] Amend the RFC to require reverse DNS, Steven F Siirila
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] SMTP & NNTP ?, wayne
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] SMTP & NNTP ?, Chuq Von Rospach
Re: [Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, wayne
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Steve Schear
RE: [Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, asrg
RE: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Tony Finch
Re: [Asrg] SMTP & NNTP ?, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Testing content filters, wayne
Re: [Asrg] Testing content filters, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Pierre Fortin
Re: [Asrg] A method to eliminate spam, Daniel Feenberg
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Claus Färber
Re: [Asrg] SMTP & NNTP ?, Claus Färber
Re: [Asrg] Amend the RFC to require reverse DNS, Claus Färber
RE: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Testing content filters, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Valdis . Kletnieks
RE: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Steve Schear
RE: [Asrg] Spam cannot be solved at the source, asrg
Re: [Asrg] A method to eliminate spam, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] spam-shake: an anti-spam e-mail protocol, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Testing content filters, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] New To The List, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Testing content filters, Valdis . Kletnieks
[Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, asrg
[Asrg] An amazing amount of spam, asrg
Re: [Asrg] Testing content filters, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Alan DeKok
RE: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, william
RE: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, william
RE: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] Re: Anti-spam idea, David F. Skoll
RE: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Rob Siemborski
Re: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Rob Siemborski
RE: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Frank de Lange
RE: [Asrg] Gray list: rating of associates, Dave Lampert
Re: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Rob Siemborski
Re: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Hadmut Danisch
RE: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Art Pollard
Re: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Frank de Lange
RE: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Damien Morton
[Asrg] try this on for size, matthew richards
Re: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, william
[Asrg] pre-meeting meeting?, Frank de Lange
Re: [Asrg] Amend the RFC to require reverse DNS, Ronald F. Guilmette
Re: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Frank de Lange

Mar 18 2003

Re: [Asrg] A method to eliminate spam, Ronald F. Guilmette
Re: [Asrg] Domain-Authorized SMTP Mail, Claus Assmann
RE: [Asrg] Thoughts so far, Steve Schear
Re: [Asrg] Testing content filters, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Testing content filters, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Testing content filters, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Gray list: rating of associates, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] spam-shake: an anti-spam e-mail protocol, Hadmut Danisch
[Asrg] spam-shake: an anti-spam e-mail protocol, Lee Murach

Mail converted by MHonArc