Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Main Archive Directory]

Mar 10 2003

Re: [Asrg] inventory of problems, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Justin Mason
RE: [Asrg] Several Observations and a solution that addresses them all, Jason Hihn
RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] Several Observations and a solution that addresses them all, Jason Hihn
RE: [Asrg] Several Observations and a solution that addresses them all, Jason Hihn
Re: [Asrg] Several Observations and a solution that addresses them all, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Several Observations and a solution that addresses them all, Tony Finch
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, David F. Skoll
RE: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Sauer, Damon
[Asrg] re: taxonomy of solutions, including some new items, Liudvikas Bukys
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] email licences, Chris Fedde
RE: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] Should email have semantics?, Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] email licences, Matt Sergeant
[Asrg] inventory of problems, Liudvikas Bukys
RE: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Keith Moore
[Asrg] taxonomy of solutions, including some new items, Liudvikas Bukys
Re: [Asrg] Several Observations and a solution that addresses them all, Jon Kyme
RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] email licences, matthew richards
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Several Observations and a solution that addresses themall, Keith Moore
RE: [Asrg] Should email have semantics?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Bruce Brown
RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Sauer, Damon
RE: [Asrg] Several Observations and a solution that addresses them all, Jason Hihn
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Several Observations and a solution that addresses themall, Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Anthony Howe
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] Several Observations and a solution that addresses them all, Jason Hihn
RE: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Keith Moore
RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Sauer, Damon
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, wayne
RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] Should email have semantics?, Mark Delany
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Hadmut Danisch
RE: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Sauer, Damon
RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, David F. Skoll
RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, wayne
[Asrg] (Fwd): Spam mail warning notification! (Advertisements), Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Hadmut Danisch
RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Taxonomy (Four oracles model), Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] What would consent look like?, Keith Moore
RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] What would consent look like?, Jon Kyme
RE: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Sauer, Damon
Re: [Asrg] Taxonomy (Four oracles model), Hadmut Danisch
RE: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Sauer, Damon
Re: [Asrg] What would consent look like?, Keith Moore
RE: [Asrg] Taxonomy (Four oracles model), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, wayne
Re: [Asrg] Taxonomy (Four oracles model), Hadmut Danisch
[Asrg] Re: "Prove you're a human", Justin Mason
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Hadmut Danisch
[Asrg] What would consent look like?, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, william
[Asrg] Lame filters at pop.snert.net, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Matt Sergeant
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), abuse
Re: [Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] ASRG work items, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Marco Paganini
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Marco Paganini
RE: [Asrg] ASRG work items, Paul Judge
[Asrg] Taxonomy of anti-spam systems, Paul Judge
[Asrg] MIT Spam Conference, wayne
[Asrg] Stopping new spam methods before they happen..., Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: Varieties of spam (was RE: [Asrg] ASRG work items), Fred Bacon
Re: [Asrg] ASRG work items, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] ASRG work items, Erez Zadok
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Erez Zadok
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] ASRG work items, Keith Moore
Varieties of spam (was RE: [Asrg] ASRG work items), Paul Judge
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, tjacobs
Re: [Asrg] ASRG work items, Fred Bacon

Mar 09 2003

Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Erez Zadok
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), abuse
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Hadmut Danisch
Re: evaluating proposals against requirements (Re: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent), Justin Mason
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Justin Mason
[Asrg] Re: Fixing the mailing lists, Valdis . Kletnieks
[Asrg] (Fwd): ADMIN: acm.org subscribers in danger, Hadmut Danisch
Re: evaluating proposals against requirements (Re: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent), wayne
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Hadmut Danisch
[Asrg] ASRG work items, Paul Judge
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] PKI and Filters, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
Re: evaluating proposals against requirements (Re: [Asrg] requirementsfor a proposed solution + notion of consent), Matt Sergeant
Re: evaluating proposals against requirements (Re: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent), Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, tjacobs
Re: evaluating proposals against requirements (Re: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent), wayne
Re: evaluating proposals against requirements (Re: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent), Hadmut Danisch
RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Mark Delany
Re: evaluating proposals against requirements (Re: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent), wayne
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, wayne
RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Why content filters are inacceptable, Jon Kyme
RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Why content filters are inacceptable, Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] Why content filters are inacceptable, Jon Kyme
RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, tjacobs
[Asrg] Filtering limitations, David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Jim Youll
RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] PKI and Filters, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] PKI and Filters, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, abuse
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Mark Delany
Re: [Asrg] PKI and Filters, Alan DeKok
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), abuse
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Henrik Levkowetz
RE: [Asrg] PKI and Filters, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] PKI and Filters, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Vernon Schryver
RE: [Asrg] PKI and Filters, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[Asrg] Lets Fix Mailing Lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Mar 08 2003

Re: [Asrg] PKI and Filters, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] PKI and Filters, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] PKI and Filters, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Chris Lewis
RE: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, David Jameson
re: [Asrg] Why content filters are inacceptable, Jim Youll
RE: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Jim Youll
RE: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Vernon Schryver
Pushing consent upstream (was Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering ), Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Joe St Sauver
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] Why content filters are inacceptable, Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Chris Lewis
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Good versus bad (was Re: RMX Records ), Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Chris Lewis
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Eric S. Johansson
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Matt Sergeant
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Eric S. Johansson
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Jon Kyme
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Chris Lewis
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), John Kodis
[OT] Snail mail spam (Was: Re: [Asrg] Stamps), Matt Sergeant
RE: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, Hadmut Danisch
[Asrg] A technological or legal solution?, Will E. Rose
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP addresses, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP addresses, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, David Jameson
[Asrg] Receiving messages twice, David Jameson
Re: [Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Keith Moore
[Asrg] DCC and IP checksums, David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Nate W
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Troy Rollo
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Vernon Schryver

Mar 07 2003

Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] Re: evaluating proposals against requirements, Keith Moore
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] DCC and IP addresses, Vernon Schryver
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Jonathan Wilkins
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world) (fwd), wayne
[Asrg] Nucleus of a draft BCP on filtering, Chris Lewis
[Asrg] DCC and IP addresses, David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Jed Margolin
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Nate W
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Troy Rollo
Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Vernon Schryver
[Asrg] Re: evaluating proposals against requirements, Nate W
Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
RE: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Collecting statistics, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] RE: claims about law, Troy Rollo
[Asrg] Peer to Peer MTA network, Claus Färber
Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent, Troy Rollo
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Vernon Schryver
RE: evaluating proposals against requirements (Re: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent), Sauer, Damon
[Asrg] Collecting statistics, David F. Skoll
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Fedde
Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] [OT] Sender verification, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
[Asrg] Race conditions at end of DATA, David F. Skoll
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world) (fwd), Vernon Schryver
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Fedde
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Re: On the need for reliable, objective data, Vernon Schryver
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Jonathan Wilkins
evaluating with the additional requirements (Re: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of conse nt), Adam Back
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] MTP draft, Claus Färber
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Justin Mason
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Vernon Schryver
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Nate W
evaluating proposals against requirements (Re: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent), Adam Back
Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Mark Delany
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world)(fwd), Keith Moore
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Vernon Schryver
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world)(fwd), Keith Moore
RE: [Asrg] Stamps, Sauer, Damon
RE: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent, Gary Feldman
Re: [Asrg] [OT] Sender verification, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Mark Delany
RE: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Gary Feldman
Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] RMX & DNS: double advantage, Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Vernon Schryver
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Jim Youll
RE: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent, Sauer, Damon
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Brad Davis
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), David Jameson
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world) (fwd), Gary Feldman
Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, David Jameson
RE: [Asrg] Stamps, Sauer, Damon
Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Back to the charter, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Kee Hinckley
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world) (fwd), Gary Feldman
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world) (fwd), wayne
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world) (fwd), william
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Keith Moore
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent, Keith Moore
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Balachander Krishnamurthy
[Asrg] Re: On the need for reliable, objective data, David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] The Consent 4-Tuple, Darren Henderson
RE: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Gary Feldman
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Keith Moore
RE: [Asrg] Stamps, Sauer, Damon
Re: [OT] Mailing list alternatives (was RE: [Asrg] Let's try somethingdifferent), Chris Lewis
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world) (fwd), Gary Feldman
RE: [Asrg] Stamps, Sauer, Damon
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Chris Lewis
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), wayne
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Michael Ellis
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Michael Ellis
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] RMX & DNS: double advantage, wayne
[Asrg] On the need for reliable, objective data, Gary Feldman
RE: [Asrg] Stamps, Sauer, Damon
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, wayne
Re: [Asrg] The Consent 4-Tuple, Alan DeKok
[OT] Mailing list alternatives (was RE: [Asrg] Let's try something different), Gary Feldman
Re: [Asrg] RE: claims about law, Tom Thomson
RE: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Sauer, Damon
[Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of consent, Balachander Krishnamurthy
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Jim Youll
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), David Jameson
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, David Jameson
Re: [Asrg] Stamps, Keith Moore
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
RE: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
RE: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Sauer, Damon
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Keith Moore
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Alan DeKok
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Alan DeKok
RE: [Asrg] Problems that make the RMX proposal infeasible, Sauer, Damon
Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] RE: claims about law, Jacqui Caren
Re: [Asrg] RE: claims about law, Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] Problems that make the RMX proposal infeasible, Pierre BRUA
[Asrg] RE: PLI and DNSSEC deployability and DNS based solutions, Tom Thomson
RMX method validity and alternatives (was Re: [Asrg] Declarationto the world), Pierre BRUA
[Asrg] RE: claims about law, Tom Thomson
[Asrg] Stamps, David Jameson
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, David Jameson
[Asrg] RMX & DNS: double advantage, Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] The Consent 4-Tuple, Jon Kyme
[Asrg] [OT] Sender verification, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Matt Sergeant
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Nate W
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Adam Back
[Asrg] ** RESEND ** Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice (please comment), Dr. Jeffrey Race
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world) (fwd), wayne
Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Dr. Jeffrey Race
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world) (fwd), william
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), william
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Shannon Jacobs
Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal, Chris Lewis
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), wayne
Re: [Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Kee Hinckley
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), william
Re: [Asrg] MTP drafty, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Michael Marking
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Lewis
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), wayne
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Fedde
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Lewis
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Chris Lewis
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Chris Lewis
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Chris Lewis
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Nate W
Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Dr. Jeffrey Race
Re: Limitations of filters (was Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?), Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] The Consent 4-Tuple, Alan DeKok
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Alan DeKok
[Asrg] DNS NONCE Record Proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Troy Rollo
[Asrg] Locked addresses (was Do we need to do anything?, David F. Skoll
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Jonathan Wilkins
Re: [Asrg] Deprecating plain POP accounts, abuse
Re: [Asrg] The Consent 4-Tuple, Chris Fedde
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, David F. Skoll
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Jonathan Wilkins
Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Fred Baker
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Nate W
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Jim Youll
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Jonathan Wilkins
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Matt Sergeant
[Asrg] The Consent 4-Tuple, Alan DeKok
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Matt Sergeant
Re: False positives (was Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX Records), Alan DeKok
Re: Disposable ISP accounts (was Re: [Asrg] RE: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #42 - 13 msgs), Dr. Jeffrey Race

Mar 06 2003

RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
RE: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Barclay, Robert
RE: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Jonathan Wilkins
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Adam Back
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Chris Fedde
Re: [Asrg] Let's try something different, Nate W
RE: [Asrg] Problems that make the RMX proposal infeasible, Jonathan Wilkins
Re: [Asrg] filtering at connect time, Michael Marking
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Jim Youll
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Keith Moore
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), wayne
RE: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, william
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Massive bounce rates on spammer lists, Kee Hinckley
RE: [Asrg] RE: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #32 - 9 msgs, Kee Hinckley
Re: [Asrg] Back to the charter, Nate W
Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] email classes! (and i dont mean email 101), Keith Moore
[Asrg] RE: DNSSEC has it's own deployment problems (Re: Keith, Hadmut both right), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Adam Back
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Hadmut Danisch
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Matt Sergeant
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Nate W
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Chris Lewis
RE: Patents (was Re: [Asrg] Time for the ISPs to fight back!), Bob Wyman
Re: [Asrg] RMX provides auth for one-hop only (Re: privacy is a feature), wayne
Re: [Asrg] Re: DNSSEC has it's own deployment problems (Re: Keith,Hadmut bo th right), Chris Lewis
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Sauer, Damon
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Jim Youll
Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, william
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Keith Moore
Re: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Troy Rollo
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Adam Back
Re: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), wayne
[Asrg] Re: DNSSEC has it's own deployment problems (Re: Keith, Hadmut bo th right), Adam Back
Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, Keith Moore
[Asrg] Re: RMX provides auth for one-hop only (Re: privacy is a feature), Chris Lewis
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Justin Mason
[Asrg] RMX provides auth for one-hop only (Re: privacy is a feature), Adam Back
[Asrg] Problems that make the RMX proposal infeasible, Jonathan Wilkins
Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world, william
[Asrg] DNSSEC has it's own deployment problems (Re: Keith, Hadmut both right), Adam Back
RE: pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: [Asrg] Economic model is borken. (sic.) Let's fix it, Nate W
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, wayne
Re: Disposable ISP accounts (was Re: [Asrg] RE: Asrg digest, Vol 1 #42 - 13 msgs), Chris Fedde
[Asrg] email classes! (and i dont mean email 101), matthew richards
[Asrg] Where to filter? (was Re: Limitations of filters), David F. Skoll
pros and cons of RMX (Re: [Asrg] Declaration to the world), Adam Back
[Asrg] old mail protocols and authentication of sender, Tom Thomson
Re: privacy is a feature (Re: [Asrg] desirable characteristics of source tracking), Adam Back
RE: [Asrg] definition of spam (was Re: consent expression), Barclay, Robert
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, David F. Skoll
Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anything?, Jim Youll
Re: Limitations of filters (was Re: [Asrg] Do we need to do anyth ing?), wayne

Mail converted by MHonArc